Understanding the public's willingness to participate in the Carbon Generalized System of Preferences (CGSP): An innovative mechanism to drive low-carbon behavior in China

[1]  S. T. Ng,et al.  Balancing economic development and construction waste management in emerging economies: A longitudinal case study of Shenzhen, China guided by the environmental Kuznets curve , 2023, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[2]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Choosing the right policy: Factors influencing the preferences of consumption-side personal carbon reduction policies. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  O. Gansser,et al.  Influence of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) and environmental concerns on pro-environmental behavioral intention based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[4]  M. Adjei,et al.  Predicting citizens' recycling intention: Incorporating natural bonding and place identity into the extended norm activation model , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[5]  Xiaojun Liu,et al.  Urban residents' acceptance of recycled water: An improved innovation-decision model considering the needs satisfied and social characteristics , 2022, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[6]  Muhammad Imran Rasheed,et al.  Residents' waste mobile recycling planned behavior model: the role of environmental concern and risk perception , 2022, International Journal of Emerging Markets.

[7]  Sujitra Vassanadumrongdee,et al.  Toward sustainable consumption of green cosmetics and personal care products: The role of perceived value and ethical concern , 2022, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[8]  Yun-han Zhang,et al.  How does the design of personal carbon trading system affect willingness to participate under carbon neutrality goal?—evidence from a choice experiment , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[9]  Naeem Hayat,et al.  Exploring the adoption of wearable healthcare devices among the Pakistani adults with dual analysis techniques , 2022, Technology in Society.

[10]  Siow-Hooi Tan,et al.  Integrating the capability approach and technology acceptance model to explain the elderly's use intention of online grocery shopping , 2022, Telematics Informatics.

[11]  W. H. Loo,et al.  Antecedents of green computer purchase behavior among Malaysian consumers from the perspective of rational choice and moral norm factors , 2022, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[12]  Guangdong Wu,et al.  Are you a water saver? Discovering people's water-saving intention by extending the theory of planned behavior. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  Liangliang Liu,et al.  Exploring non-users' intention to adopt ride-sharing services: Taking into account increased risks due to the COVID-19 pandemic among other factors , 2022, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[14]  Joon Soo Lim,et al.  Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency , 2022, Technology in Society.

[15]  G. Schewe,et al.  Managing the transition to eco-friendly packaging – An investigation of consumers’ motives in online retail , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[16]  Hongyun Si,et al.  Determinants of consumers’ continuance intention to use dynamic ride-sharing services , 2022, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[17]  L. Meyer-Waarden,et al.  The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy calculus theories , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[18]  Jiwoong Shin,et al.  Extended technology acceptance model to explain the mechanism of modular construction adoption , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[19]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling , 2021, Handbook of Market Research.

[20]  K. Shaw,et al.  An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption , 2021, Technology in Society.

[21]  E. Chan,et al.  Are you an energy saver at home? The personality insights of household energy conservation behaviors based on theory of planned behavior , 2021 .

[22]  Ulla A. Saari,et al.  Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention , 2021 .

[23]  Yaobin Liu,et al.  Understanding waste sorting behavior and key influencing factors through internet of things: Evidence from college student community , 2021 .

[24]  Z. Bao,et al.  Tackling the "last mile" problem in renovation waste management: A case study in China. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  Enterprise systems knowledge, beliefs, and attitude: A model of informed technology acceptance , 2021, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Rambabu Lavuri.  Extending the theory of planned behavior: factors fostering millennials’ intention to purchase eco-sustainable products in an emerging market , 2021, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.

[27]  Zhiqiang Wang,et al.  Impacts of consumer innovativeness on the intention to purchase sustainable products , 2021, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[28]  Chang Wang,et al.  The influence of economic incentives on residents’ intention to participate in online recycling: An experimental study from China , 2021 .

[29]  C. Jeong,et al.  Distinctive roles of tourist eudaimonic and hedonic experiences on satisfaction and place attachment: Combined use of SEM and necessary condition analysis , 2021 .

[30]  B. Hwang,et al.  Influencing Paths of the Behavior-Driven Household Energy-Saving Exploring the influencing paths of the behavior-driven household energy-saving intervention—Household Energy-Saving Option , 2021 .

[31]  S. Rai,et al.  Modeling the predictors of consumers’ online purchase intention of green products: the role of personal innovativeness and environmental drive , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[32]  Daniel Hanss,et al.  Why consumers shift from single-use to reusable drink cups: An empirical application of the stage model of self-regulated behavioural change , 2021, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[33]  Masoud Yazdanpanah,et al.  How can socio-psychological factors be related to water-efficiency intention and behaviors among Iranian residential water consumers? , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[34]  Hee-Cheol Moon,et al.  Service transformation under industry 4.0: Investigating acceptance of facial recognition payment through an extended technology acceptance model , 2021 .

[35]  Bo Shen,et al.  What prevents us from taking low-carbon actions? A comprehensive review of influencing factors affecting low-carbon behaviors , 2021 .

[36]  Yanan Wang,et al.  Low-carbon development quality of cities in China: Evaluation and obstacle analysis , 2021 .

[37]  Ying Xiao,et al.  A new carbon emission reduction mechanism: Carbon Generalized System of Preferences (CGSP) , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[38]  Guangdong Wu,et al.  Understanding bike-sharing users’ willingness to participate in repairing damaged bicycles: Evidence from China , 2020 .

[39]  H. Ates.  Merging Theory of Planned Behavior and Value Identity Personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors , 2020 .

[40]  A. Dąbrowska,et al.  Responsible consumer and lifestyle: Sustainability insights , 2020, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[41]  B. Gupta,et al.  The adoption of online e-waste collection platform to improve environmental sustainability: an empirical study of Chinese millennials , 2020 .

[42]  Dharun Kasilingam.  Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping , 2020 .

[43]  C. Hall,et al.  Can sustainable restaurant practices enhance customer loyalty? The roles of value theory and environmental concerns , 2020, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management.

[44]  J. Dul,et al.  A Statistical Significance Test for Necessary Condition Analysis , 2020 .

[45]  Z. Bao,et al.  Developing efficient circularity for construction and demolition waste management in fast emerging economies: Lessons learned from Shenzhen, China. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[46]  Muhammad Imtiaz Shafiq,et al.  Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM) , 2020, Technology in Society.

[47]  Guanghui Zhou,et al.  User continuance of a green behavior mobile application in China: An empirical study of Ant Forest , 2020 .

[48]  Xueping Tan,et al.  What drives public willingness to participate in the voluntary personal carbon-trading scheme? A case study of Guangzhou Pilot, China , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[49]  Alfonso Rosa-García,et al.  Why continue sharing: Determinants of behavior in ridesharing services , 2018, International Journal of Market Research.

[50]  Jan Dul,et al.  Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) Does Exactly What It Should Do When Applied Properly: A Reply to a Comment on NCA* , 2018, Sociological Methods & Research.

[51]  Miyoung Jeong,et al.  What makes you choose Airbnb again? An examination of users’ perceptions toward the website and their stay , 2018, International Journal of Hospitality Management.

[52]  Jing Wang,et al.  An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model , 2018, Transportation.

[53]  Kristina Lauche,et al.  Implementing lean practices in manufacturing SMEs: testing ‘critical success factors’ using Necessary Condition Analysis , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[54]  Jan Dul,et al.  Analyzing Relationships of Necessity Not Just in Kind But Also in Degree , 2016, Sociological methods & research.

[55]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use , 2017 .

[56]  R. Yadav,et al.  Young consumers' intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior , 2016 .

[57]  Jan Dul,et al.  Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) , 2015 .

[58]  L. Steg,et al.  It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour , 2013 .

[59]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[60]  Axel Franzen,et al.  Environmental Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000 , 2010 .

[61]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  Irwin Brown,et al.  Exploring Differences in Internet Adoption and Usage between Historically Advantaged and Disadvantaged Groups in South Africa , 2003 .

[63]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[64]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[65]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  Randall L. Rose,et al.  The Effects of Environmental Concern on Environmentally Friendly Consumer Behavior: An Exploratory Study , 1997 .

[67]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[68]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[69]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error , 1981 .

[70]  I. Ajzen,et al.  A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. , 1975 .