Disentangling effects of structure and knowledge in perceiving partly occluded shapes: An ERP study

Using event-related potentials (ERPs) we investigated the influence of object knowledge on perceiving partly occluded shapes. We created stimuli based on well-known objects of which the middle part was occluded. Object completions that were compatible with structure consisted of the connection of the visible fragments by smoothly extending their contours. In contrast, object completions that were incompatible with structure consisted of separate disconnected completions of the fragments. Furthermore, object completions could be in line with, or conflict with expectations based on knowledge. We measured ERPs when hidden parts were revealed by removing the occluder, and observed an early positive ERP peaking around 115-140ms at occipital sites, presumably triggered by physical differences. Most importantly, we observed a positive ERP peaking around 300-400ms at parieto-occipital sites that could be related to influences of both structure and knowledge. An additional analysis controlling for differential stimulus characteristics revealed similar conclusions. All in all, we demonstrate that the interpretation of partly occluded shapes is not solely driven by stimulus structure, but that it can also be influenced by knowledge of objects.

[1]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Local and Global Processes in Visual Completion , 1994 .

[2]  W. Gerbino,et al.  Contour interpolation by vector-field combination. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[3]  G. Mangun,et al.  Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. , 1995, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  F. Boselie,et al.  A good-continuation model of some occlusion phenomena , 1992, Psychological research.

[5]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  The demise of the identity hypothesis and the insufficiency and nonnecessity of contour relatability in predicting object interpolation: comment on Kellman, Garrigan, and Shipley (2005). , 2007, Psychological review.

[6]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Early electrophysiological indices of illusory contour processing within the lateral occipital complex are virtually impervious to manipulations of illusion strength , 2012, NeuroImage.

[7]  B. Anderson.  Filling-in models of completion: rejoinder to Kellman, Garrigan, Shipley, and Keane (2007) and Albert (2007). , 2007, Psychological review.

[8]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Setting Boundaries: Brain Dynamics of Modal and Amodal Illusory Shape Completion in Humans , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Vecera,et al.  Visual Cognition Influences Early Vision Role of Visual Short-Term Memory in Amodal , 2005 .

[10]  A. Michotte,et al.  Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptives , 1964 .

[11]  D. Surmeier,et al.  Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex , 2022 .

[12]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Detecting Novelty and Significance , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Sekuler.  Local and Global Minima in Visual Completion: Effects of Symmetry and Orientation , 1994, Perception.

[14]  Simon J Hazenberg,et al.  Differential familiarity effects in amodal completion: support from behavioral and electrophysiological measurements. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Gijs Plomp,et al.  Asymmetric priming effects in visual processing of occlusion patterns , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Coding theory of visual pattern completion. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  N Rubin,et al.  The Role of Junctions in Surface Completion and Contour Matching , 2001, Perception.

[19]  Jacqueline M. Fulvio,et al.  Precision and consistency of contour interpolation , 2008, Vision Research.

[20]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Early processing in the human lateral occipital complex is highly responsive to illusory contours but not to salient regions , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[22]  M. Bar,et al.  Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  R. van Lier.  Investigating global effects in visual occlusion: from a partly occluded square to the back of a tree-trunk. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[25]  Thomas D Albright,et al.  On the Perception of Probable Things: Neural Substrates of Associative Memory, Imagery, and Perception , 2012, Neuron.

[26]  P. Kellman,et al.  Interpolation processes in object perception: reply to Anderson (2007). , 2007, Psychological review.

[27]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Boundary Completion Is Automatic and Dissociable from Shape Discrimination , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Taosheng Liu,et al.  Temporally Unfolding Neural Representation of Pictorial Occlusion , 2006, Psychological science.

[29]  Lars Muckli,et al.  Separate cortical stages in amodal completion revealed by functional magnetic resonance adaptation , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[30]  P U Tse,et al.  Complete mergeability and amodal completion. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[31]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Cortical responses to contextual influences in amodal completion , 2006, NeuroImage.

[32]  Rob van Lier,et al.  Bricks, Butter, and Slices of Cucumber: Investigating Semantic Influences in Amodal Completion , 2009, Perception.

[33]  G. Kanizsa.  Subjective contours. , 1976, Scientific American.

[34]  Rob van Lier,et al.  Global Visual Completion of Quasi-Regular Shapes , 2002 .

[35]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Competing global and local completions in visual occlusion. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Patrick Garrigan,et al.  Object interpolation in three dimensions. , 2005, Psychological review.

[37]  G. Woodman.  A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Early completion of occluded objects , 1998, Vision Research.

[39]  R van Lier,et al.  Integrating Global and Local Aspects of Visual Occlusion , 1994, Perception.

[40]  A B Sekuler,et al.  Time course of amodal completion revealed by a shape discrimination task , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  B. Anderson,et al.  Amodal completion is modulated by lightness similarity , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[43]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Competing global and local completions in visual occlusion. , 1995 .

[44]  P J Kellman,et al.  Surface Completion Complements Boundary Interpolation in the Visual Integration of Partly Occluded Objects , 1997, Perception.

[45]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[46]  G. Kanizsa.  Seeing and thinking. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[47]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Against better knowledge: The magical force of amodal volume completion , 2013, i-Perception.

[48]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. , 1992 .

[49]  Tessa C J de Wit,et al.  Global Visual Completion of Quasi-Regular Shapes , 2002, Perception.

[50]  Guy L. Lacroix,et al.  The effect of dot lifetime, dot size, & percent area covered by dots on motion coherence thresholds: Implications for diagnosing reading difficulties , 2010 .