Toward Dynamic Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility

Today, sustainable relations with a broad range of key stakeholders are not only important from a normative business ethics perspective, but also from an entrepreneurial viewpoint to allow and support the long-term survival of a firm. We will argue that the traditional conception of a firm’s corporate social responsibility does not reflect this view and that a comprehensive and dynamic conception of a firm’s responsibilities is necessary to map the reality of business practice and to manage the challenges implied by sustainability. We think that distributive justice, that is the way in which firms involve their stakeholders in their wealth creation and dissemination processes, provides a comprehensive understanding of corporate responsibilities. Concerning procedural justice, we will discuss how firms involve stakeholders in their strategic processes according to their contribution to wealth creation. In the course of the article, we will propose a framework along with three design principles that can be used for shaping dynamic and comprehensive corporate responsibilities, and which thereby allow a sustainable procedure for changing business and non-business environments.

[1]  Paul Hemp Growing for Broke , 2002 .

[2]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[3]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[4]  L. Preston,et al.  Book Review Essay: Effective Governance in Managing Change: Common Perspective from Two Lenses , 2004 .

[5]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Towards a Property Rights Foundation for a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm , 2005 .

[6]  James P. Walsh,et al.  Book Review Essay: Taking Stock of Stakeholder Management , 2005 .

[7]  Sybille Sachs,et al.  Sustainable Success with Stakeholders , 2009 .

[8]  R. Freeman The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[9]  Patricia H. Werhane,et al.  Business Ethics: The State of the Art , 1999 .

[10]  D. Wood Corporate Social Performance Revisited , 1991 .

[11]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The new organizational wealth , 1997 .

[12]  Duane Windsor,et al.  Stakeholder Responsibilities Lessons for Managers , 2002 .

[13]  Margaret M. Blair,et al.  A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law , 1999 .

[14]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[15]  James E. Mattingly Stakeholder Salience, Structural Development, and Firm Performance: Structural and Performance Correlates of Sociopolitical Stakeholder Management Strategies , 2004 .

[16]  M. Porter,et al.  The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[17]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[18]  Satoshi Shimizutani,et al.  Employment policy and corporate governance-- An empirical comparison of the stakeholder and the profit-maximization model , 2007 .

[19]  Aimé Heene,et al.  Toward stakeholder responsibility and stakeholder motivation: Systemic and holistic perspectives on corporate sustainability* , 2003 .

[20]  David Vogel,et al.  The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .

[21]  James E. Mattingly Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth , 2004 .

[22]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[23]  Kurt Wickman,et al.  Rethinking Tax Policies: New Ideas from a Dead Economist , 2004 .

[24]  Margaret M. Blair Closing the Theory Gap: How the Economic Theory of Property Rights Can Help Bring ‘‘Stakeholders’’ Back into Theories of the Firm , 2005 .

[25]  L. Preston,et al.  Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth , 2002 .

[26]  Colin Mayer,et al.  Ownership and Control , 1995 .

[27]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[28]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Stakeholder Theory and "The Corporate Objective Revisited" , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[29]  Thomas Donaldson,et al.  Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder Theory , 2008, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[30]  M. Schwartz Carroll's Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: A New Approach , 1997 .

[31]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[32]  Suzanne Beaulieu,et al.  Reintroducing Stakeholder Dynamics in Stakeholder Thinking , 2002 .

[33]  A. Wicks,et al.  What Stakeholder Theory is Not , 2003 .

[34]  J. Calton Social Contracting in a Pluralist Process of Moral Sense Making: A Dialogic Twist on the ISCT , 2006 .

[35]  Sybille Sachs,et al.  Sustainable Success with Stakeholders: The Untapped Potential , 2009 .

[36]  A. Carroll The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[37]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[38]  M. Friedman The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[39]  Robert A. Phillips,et al.  Value Chain Responsibility: A Farewell to Arm's Length , 2005 .

[40]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.