Advanced steady‐state model for the fate of hydrophobic and volatile compounds in activated sludge

A steady-state, advanced, general fate model developed to study the fate of organic compounds in primary and activated-sludge systems. This model considers adsorption, biodegradation from the dissolved and adsorbed phases, bubble volatilization, and surface volatilization as removal mechanisms. A series of modeling experiments was performed to identify the key trends of these removal mechanisms for compounds with a range of molecular properties. With typical municipal wastewater treatment conditions, the results from the modeling experiments show that co-metabolic and primary utilization mechanisms give very different trends in biodegradation for the compounds tested. For co-metabolism, the effluent concentration increases when the influent concentration increases, while the effluent concentration remains unchanged when primary utilization occurs. For a highly hydrophobic compound, the fraction of compound removed from adsorption onto primary sludge can be very important, and the direct biodegradation of compound sorbed to the activated sludge greatly increases its biodegradation and reduces its discharge with the waste activated sludge. Volatilization from the surface of the primary and secondary systems is important for compounds with moderate to high volatilities, especially when these compounds are not biodegradable. Finally, bubble volatilization can be a major removal mechanism for highly volatile compounds even when they are highly biodegradable.

[1]  Susan Ainsworth,et al.  SOAPS AND DETERGENTS: Industry relies increasingly on suppliers to keep up with fast-paced reformulations , 1994 .

[2]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Influence of interfaces on microbial activity. , 1990, Microbiological reviews.

[3]  W. Eckenfelder Closure of "Absorption of Oxygen from Air Bubbles in Water" , 1959 .

[4]  P. Roberts,et al.  Mass transfer of volatile organic contaminants from aqueous solution to the atmosphere during surface aeration. , 1983, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  D. Mackay,et al.  Rate of evaporation of low-solubility contaminants from water bodies to atmosphere , 1973 .

[6]  P. Liss,et al.  Flux of Gases across the Air-Sea Interface , 1974, Nature.

[7]  R. Larson,et al.  Adsorption and biodegradation of cationic surfactants in laboratory and environmental systems , 1983 .

[8]  B. Rittmann,et al.  Effect of water-surface desorption on volatile compound removal under bubble aeration , 1991 .

[9]  S. Karickhoff,et al.  Semi-empirical estimation of sorption of hydrophobic pollutants on natural sediments and soils , 1981 .

[10]  J. P. Bell,et al.  A field scale evaluation of the airstripping of volatile organic compounds by surface aerators , 1996 .

[11]  M. Stenstrom,et al.  Estimating Emissions of 20 VOCs. II: Diffused Aeration , 1993 .

[12]  Tom C. J. Feijtel,et al.  An improved model for predicting the fate of consumer product chemicals in wastewater treatment plants , 1993 .

[13]  R. Reid,et al.  The Properties of Gases and Liquids , 1977 .

[14]  C. P. L. Grady,et al.  Toxicity of selected RCRA compounds to activated sludge microorganisms , 1988 .

[15]  W. Gujer,et al.  Transfer of volatile substances from water to the atmosphere , 1981 .

[16]  S. Karickhoff,et al.  SORPTION OF HYDROPHOBIC POLLUTANTS ON NATURAL SEDIMENTS , 1979 .

[17]  Lei Lai,et al.  Integrated model for predicting the fate of organics in wastewater treatment plants , 1991 .

[18]  Eun Namkung,et al.  ESTIMATING VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS FROM PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS. , 1987 .

[19]  J. P. Bell,et al.  Modeling the fate of pesticides in municipal wastewater treatment , 1995 .

[20]  D. van de Meent,et al.  A spreadsheet-based box model to predict the fate of xenobiotics in a municipal wastewater treatment plant , 1991 .

[21]  J. P. Bell,et al.  Fate of volatile organic compounds in municipal activated sludge plants , 1993 .

[22]  B. Rittmann Microbiological detoxification of hazardous organic contaminants: The crucial role of substrate interactions , 1992 .

[23]  Bruce E. Rittmann,et al.  In situ bioremediation , 1994 .

[24]  R. Shimp,et al.  Availability of organic chemicals for biodegradation in settled bottom sediments. , 1988, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.

[25]  P. Roberts,et al.  Modeling volatile organic solute removal by surface and bubble aeration , 1984 .