Obtaining Reliable Diagnostic Information through Constrained CAT

Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) has the advantage of delivering tests in an interactive manner such that the ability or latent traits are more effectively estimated. Until now, most research concerning item selection rules in CAT has been built upon either item response theory (IRT) or cognitive diagnostic models (CDM) separately. The only study that combined these two approaches together was done by McGlohen and Chang (2008). They proposed a two-stage method, in which a “shadow” test functioned as a bridge to connect information gathered at  for IRT, and information accumulated at  for CDM. In this paper, we develop a one-stage method to build a CAT featuring reliable cognitive diagnosis. The major idea is to treat diagnostic information as various constraints, and by using a maximum priority index (MPI) method to meet these constraints the cognitive diagnosis can be done reliably at the end of the test. Several priority functions are proposed, some based upon formal measures of information, like Kullback-Leibler information, and others only utilize the knowledge of which items measure what attributes, as provided by the Q matrix. Simulation studies and their results are reported. We show how utilization of information-based methods both yields higher classification rates for cognitive diagnosis and achieve accurate  estimation. Item exposure rates are also considered for all competing methods.

[1]  Cornelis A.W. Glas,et al.  Computerized adaptive testing : theory and practice , 2000 .

[2]  C. Mitchell Dayton,et al.  The Use of Probabilistic Models in the Assessment of Mastery , 1977 .

[3]  R. Henson,et al.  Cognitive Diagnostic Attribute-Level Discrimination Indices , 2008 .

[4]  Matthias von Davier,et al.  A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. , 2008, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[5]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  Constraint-Weighted a-Stratification for Computerized Adaptive Testing With Nonstatistical Constraints , 2009 .

[6]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1996 .

[7]  E. Maris Estimating multiple classification latent class models , 1999 .

[8]  Curtis Tatsuoka,et al.  Data analytic methods for latent partially ordered classification models , 2002 .

[9]  Z. Ying,et al.  a-Stratified Multistage Computerized Adaptive Testing , 1999 .

[10]  Edward H. Haertel Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items , 1989 .

[11]  Jeffrey A Douglas,et al.  Test Construction for Cognitive Diagnosis , 2005 .

[12]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  Two-Phase Item Selection Procedure for Flexible Content Balancing in CAT , 2007 .

[13]  Kikumi K. Tatsuoka,et al.  A Probabilistic Model for Diagnosing Misconceptions By The Pattern Classification Approach , 1985 .

[14]  Jeffrey A Douglas,et al.  Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis , 2004 .

[15]  van der Linden,et al.  Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests , 2000 .

[16]  Matthias von Davier,et al.  A General Diagnostic Model Applied to Language Testing Data. Research Report. ETS RR-05-16. , 2005 .

[17]  B. Junker,et al.  Cognitive Assessment Models with Few Assumptions, and Connections with Nonparametric Item Response Theory , 2001 .

[18]  Jonathan Templin,et al.  Robustness of Hierarchical Modeling of Skill Association in Cognitive Diagnosis Models , 2008 .