Analysis of the IFN-γ-Signaling Pathway in Macrophages at Different Stages of Maturation

We previously demonstrated that the macrophage cell lines RAW 264.7 and WEHI-3 exhibit distinct patterns of gene expression in response to IFN-γ. This difference is controlled at the transcriptional level and results from a specific inability of the less mature WEHI-3 cells to utilize either the IFN-stimulated response element or the γ-activated sequence DNA regulatory element in response to stimulation with IFN-γ, while other aspects of IFN-γ gene induction remain intact. In the work described here, we examined the components of the IFN-γ signal transduction pathway in RAW 264.7 and WEHI-3 cells to determine whether differences in pathway components or activity exist in WEHI-3 cells that could give rise to this difference in transcriptional response. Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) and flow cytometric analyses indicated that the levels of IFN-γ receptor mRNA accumulation and protein expression are comparable for RAW 264.7 and WEHI-3 cells. RT-PCR and immunoblot analyses revealed that the principal components of this signaling pathway, including JAK1, JAK2, and STAT1, are present in both RAW 264.7 and WEHI-3 cells. However, analysis of STAT1 DNA-binding activity by electrophoretic mobility shift assay and of STAT1 phosphorylation by immunoblot revealed that this DNA-binding factor is active in RAW 264.7, but not in WEHI-3, cells after IFN-γ stimulation. These results demonstrate that the components of the IFN-γ signal transduction pathway are intact in WEHI-3 cells, but stimulation of these cells by IFN-γ does not result in STAT1 activation.

[1]  D. Lucas,et al.  Differential utilization of IFN-gamma-responsive elements in two maturationally distinct macrophage cell lines. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[2]  J. Darnell,et al.  Maximal activation of transcription by statl and stat3 requires both tyrosine and serine phosphorylation , 1995, Cell.

[3]  R. Schreiber,et al.  Interferon gamma signals via a high-affinity multisubunit receptor complex that contains two types of polypeptide chain. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  J. Blenis,et al.  Requirement of serine phosphorylation for formation of STAT-promoter complexes. , 1995, Science.

[5]  O. Silvennoinen,et al.  Signaling through the hematopoietic cytokine receptors. , 1995, Annual review of immunology.

[6]  J. Darnell,et al.  Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins. , 1994, Science.

[7]  J. Darnell,et al.  Interferon activation of the transcription factor Stat91 involves dimerization through SH2-phosphotyrosyl peptide interactions , 1994, Cell.

[8]  C. Nicolet,et al.  Promoter analysis of an interferon-inducible gene associated with macrophage activation. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[9]  C. Schindler,et al.  Tyrosine phosphorylated p91 binds to a single element in the ISGF2/IRF‐1 promoter to mediate induction by IFN alpha and IFN gamma, and is likely to autoregulate the p91 gene. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[10]  G. Stark,et al.  Complementation by the protein tyrosine kinase JAK2 of a mutant cell line defective in the interferon-& gamma; signal transduction pathway , 1993, Nature.

[11]  G. Stark,et al.  The protein tyrosine kinase JAK1 complements defects in interferon-α/β and -γ signal transduction , 1993, Nature.

[12]  J. Darnell,et al.  Induction of the Ly-6A/E gene by interferon alpha/beta and gamma requires a DNA element to which a tyrosine-phosphorylated 91-kDa protein binds. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. Darnell,et al.  The genomic structure of the murine ICSBP gene reveals the presence of the gamma interferon-responsive element, to which an ISGF3 alpha subunit (or similar) molecule binds , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[14]  J. Darnell,et al.  Interferon gamma-induced transcription of the high-affinity Fc receptor for IgG requires assembly of a complex that includes the 91-kDa subunit of transcription factor ISGF3. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Pinson,et al.  Characterization and use of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against the mouse interferon‐γ receptor , 1992, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[16]  T. Wynn,et al.  Identification and characterization of a new gene family induced during macrophage activation. , 1991, Journal of immunology.

[17]  L. Schook,et al.  Macrophage heterogeneity occurs through a developmental mechanism. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. Darnell,et al.  Overlapping elements in the guanylate-binding protein gene promoter mediate transcriptional induction by alpha and gamma interferons , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[19]  S. Vogel,et al.  Differential Production of IFN‐α/β by CSF‐1‐ and GM‐CSF‐Derived Macrophages , 1990 .

[20]  L. Lambert,et al.  Identification and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for macrophages at intermediate stages in the tumoricidal activation pathway. , 1990, Journal of immunology.

[21]  L. Lambert,et al.  Differential induction of activation markers in macrophage cell lines by interferon-gamma. , 1989, Cellular immunology.

[22]  J. K. Pullen,et al.  Regulation of IL-1 and TNF-alpha expression during the differentiation of bone marrow derived macrophage. , 1989, Journal of immunology.

[23]  A. Jansen,et al.  Murine macrophage cell lines can be ordered in a linear differentiation sequence. , 1986, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[24]  T. Hamilton,et al.  The cell biology of macrophage activation. , 1984, Annual review of immunology.