Comparative study of mathematical and experimental analysis of spark ignition engine performance used ethanol–gasoline blend fuel

Abstract This study consists of two cases: (i) The experimental analysis : Ethanol obtained from biomass can be used as a fuel in spark ignition engines. As renewable energy source ethanol, due to the high octane number, low emissions and high engine performance is preferred alternative fuel. First stage of this study, ethanol–unleaded gasoline blends (E10, E20, E40 and E60) were tested in a single cylinder, four-stroke spark ignition and fuel injection engine. The tests were performed by varying the ignition timing, relative air–fuel ratio (RAFR) and compression ratio at a constant speed of 2000 rpm and at wide open throttle (WOT). Effect of ethanol–unleaded gasoline blends and tests variables on engine torque and specific fuel consumption were examined experimentally. (ii) The mathematical modeling analysis : The use of ANN has been proposed to determine the engine torque and specific fuel consumption based on the ignition timing, RAFR and compression ratio at a constant speed of 2000 rpm and at WOT for different fuel densities using results of experimental analysis. The back-propagation learning algorithm with two different variants and logistic sigmoid transfer function were used in the network. In order to train the neural network, limited experimental measurements were used as training and test data. The best fitting training data set was obtained Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm with five neurons in the hidden layer, which made it possible to the engine torque and specific fuel consumption with accuracy at least as good as that of the experimental error, over the whole experimental range. After training, it was found the R 2 values are 0.999996 and 0.999991 for, the engine torque and specific fuel consumption, respectively. Similarly, these values for testing data are 0.999977 and 0.999915, respectively. As seen from the results of mathematical modeling, the calculated engine torque and specific fuel consumption are obviously within acceptable uncertainties.

[1]  Richard L. Bechtold,et al.  Alternative fuels guidebook , 1997 .

[2]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[3]  Adnan Sözen,et al.  Investigation of thermodynamic properties of refrigerant/absorbent couples using artificial neural networks , 2004 .

[4]  Adnan Sözen,et al.  Modelling of yield length in the mould of commercial plastics using artificial neural networks , 2007 .

[5]  E. Arcaklioğlu,et al.  Use of artificial neural networks for mapping of solar potential in Turkey , 2004 .

[6]  Tsung-Lin Wu,et al.  Engine performance and pollutant emission of an SI engine using ethanol–gasoline blended fuels , 2002 .

[7]  M. Al-Hasan Effect of ethanol-unleaded gasoline blends on engine performance and exhaust emission , 2003 .

[8]  S. Biswas,et al.  Liquid—vapour coexistence curve of methyl fluoride in the critical region , 1989 .

[9]  D. Richon,et al.  Modeling of thermodynamic properties using neural networks: Application to refrigerants , 2002 .

[10]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Applications of artificial neural-networks for energy systems , 2000 .

[11]  Roberto Battiti,et al.  First- and Second-Order Methods for Learning: Between Steepest Descent and Newton's Method , 1992, Neural Computation.

[12]  L. Puigjaner,et al.  Use of neural networks and expert systems to control a gas/solid sorption chilling machine , 1999 .

[13]  E. A. Ajav,et al.  Thermal balance of a single cylinder diesel engine operating on alternative fuels , 2000 .

[14]  Venkatesh Rao,et al.  Investigation into the Vehicle Exhaust Emissions of High Percentage Ethanol Blends , 1995 .

[15]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[16]  Mohammad Bagher Menhaj,et al.  Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[17]  M. M. Osman,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON VARYING THE COMPRESSION RATIO OF SI ENGINE WORKING UNDER DIFFERENT ETHANOL–GASOLINE FUEL BLENDS , 1997 .

[18]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Artificial intelligence for the modeling and control of combustion processes: a review , 2003 .

[19]  Maher A.R. Sadiq Al-Baghdadi A study on the hydrogen–ethyl alcohol dual fuel spark ignition engine , 2002 .

[20]  Maher A.R. Sadiq Al-Baghdadi,et al.  Performance study of a four-stroke spark ignition engine working with both of hydrogen and ethyl alcohol as supplementary fuel , 2000 .

[21]  Eran Sher,et al.  Handbook of Air Pollution from Internal Combustion Engines: Pollutant Formation and Control , 1998 .

[22]  Vojislav Kecman,et al.  New approach to dynamic modelling of vapour-compression liquid chillers: artificial neural networks , 2001 .

[23]  F. N. Alasfour NOx EMISSION FROM A SPARK IGNITION ENGINE USING 30% ISO-BUTANOL–GASOLINE BLEND: PART 2—IGNITION TIMING , 1998 .

[24]  M. Ranjan,et al.  Solar resource estimation using artificial neural networks and comparison with other correlation models , 2003 .

[25]  Mohamed Mohandes,et al.  Estimation of global solar radiation using artificial neural networks , 1998 .

[26]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Modeling and simulation of a stand-alone photovoltaic system using an adaptive artificial neural network: Proposition for a new sizing procedure , 2007 .