Behavioral Reactivity Associated With Electronic Monitoring of Environmental Health Interventions--A Cluster Randomized Trial with Water Filters and Cookstoves.

Subject reactivity--when research participants change their behavior in response to being observed--has been documented showing the effect of human observers. Electronics sensors are increasingly used to monitor environmental health interventions, but the effect of sensors on behavior has not been assessed. We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in Rwanda among 170 households (70 blinded to the presence of the sensor, 100 open) testing whether awareness of an electronic monitor would result in a difference in weekly use of household water filters and improved cookstoves over a four-week surveillance period. A 63% increase in number of uses of the water filter per week between the groups was observed in week 1, an average of 4.4 times in the open group and 2.83 times in the blind group, declining in week 4 to an insignificant 55% difference of 2.82 uses in the open, and 1.93 in the blind. There were no significant differences in the number of stove uses per week between the two groups. For both filters and stoves, use decreased in both groups over four-week installation periods. This study suggests behavioral monitoring should attempt to account for reactivity to awareness of electronic monitors that persists for weeks or more.

[1]  Christina K. Barstow,et al.  Study design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate a large-scale distribution of cook stoves and water filters in Western Province, Rwanda , 2016, Contemporary clinical trials communications.

[2]  Daniel L. Wilson,et al.  Measuring and Increasing Adoption Rates of Cookstoves in a Humanitarian Crisis. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  T. Clasen,et al.  Process evaluation and assessment of use of a large scale water filter and cookstove program in Rwanda , 2016, BMC Public Health.

[4]  K. Balakrishnan,et al.  Reactivity in rapidly collected hygiene and toilet spot check measurements: a cautionary note for longitudinal studies. , 2015, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[5]  Narendra K. Arora,et al.  Patterns of Stove Usage after Introduction of an Advanced Cookstove: The Long-Term Application of Household Sensors , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Christina K Barstow,et al.  Use of remotely reporting electronic sensors for assessing use of water filters and cookstoves in Rwanda. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Michael Fleming,et al.  Remotely Accessible Instrumented Monitoring of Global Development Programs: Technology Development and Validation , 2013 .

[8]  Kara L Nelson,et al.  Making sanitation count: developing and testing a device for assessing latrine use in low-income settings. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Jonathan Zinman,et al.  Being surveyed can change later behavior and related parameter estimates , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  S. Luby,et al.  Is structured observation a valid technique to measure handwashing behavior? Use of acceleration sensors embedded in soap to assess reactivity to structured observation. , 2010, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[11]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  S. Cousens,et al.  Measuring hygiene practices: a comparison of questionnaires with direct observations in rural Zaïre , 1997, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[13]  K. Aziz,et al.  Twenty-four-hour recall, knowledge-attitude-practice questionnaires, and direct observations of sanitary practices: a comparative study. , 1987, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.