Pseudohomophone effects in processing Chinese compound words

The issue of how phonological information becomes available in reading Chinese and the role that it plays in lexical access was investigated for Chinese compound words, using pseudohomophone effects in lexical and phonological decision as a diagnostic tool. Pseudohomophones were created by replacing one or both constituents of two-character compound words with orthographically dissimilar homophonic characters. Experiment 1 found that mixed pseudohomophones sharing one constituent with their base words were more difficult to reject than control nonwords in lexical decision. Pure pseudohomophones sharing no constituents with their base words did not show this effect. Experiment 2 used mixed pseudohomophones and found an interaction between base word frequency and the frequency of constituent characters in determining pseudohomophone effects. Experiment 3 used a phonological decision task and found exceptionally poor performance for pure pseudohomophones. These results are interpreted in an interactive framework where the direct mapping from orthography to semantics is dominant and phonology plays a subsidiary role.

[1]  M. Y. Kjell.  Orthography and phonology in Sidaamu Afoo (Sidamo) , 2004 .

[2]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification , 1998 .

[3]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Morphology, Orthography, and Phonology in Reading Chinese Compound Words , 1999 .

[4]  David Nunan,et al.  Language Teaching and Research. , 1997 .

[5]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation of Compound Words--Cross-Linguistic Evidence , 2000 .

[6]  D. Besner,et al.  Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. , 1987 .

[7]  J. Rueckl,et al.  Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks , 1997 .

[8]  R Frost,et al.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphological Structure in the Chinese Mental Lexicon , 1995 .

[10]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  R. Frost.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998 .

[12]  M. Taft,et al.  Submorphemic Processing in Reading Chinese , 2001 .

[13]  Jian Wang,et al.  Reading Chinese Script : A Cognitive Analysis , 1999 .

[14]  Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. , 1996 .

[15]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Words, Morphemes, and Syllables in the Chinese Mental Lexicon. , 1994 .

[16]  J C Ziegler,et al.  Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Jian Wang,et al.  Is There Phonologically Mediated Access to Lexical Semantics in Reading Chinese , 1999 .

[18]  Lawrence Locker,et al.  Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[19]  M. Taft,et al.  Lack of Phonological Mediation in a Semantic Categorization Task , 1998 .

[20]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[21]  Mark S. Seidenberg.  Reading Complex Words , 1989 .

[22]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese , 1999 .

[23]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? , 1987 .

[24]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  Diagnostics of phonological lexical processing: Pseudohomophone naming advantages, disadvantages, and base-word frequency effects , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Derek Besner,et al.  Word recognition and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access? , 1988 .

[26]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Linguistic Structure in Language Processing , 1988 .

[27]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Ken N. Seergobin,et al.  On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? , 1990 .

[29]  Giovanni B. Flores d'Arcais,et al.  Orthographic and phonological activation in recognizing Chinese characters , 1995 .

[30]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  S. Sasanuma,et al.  Orthography and phonology in reading Japanese kanji words: Evidence from the semantic decision task with homophones , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[32]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  G. C. Orden.  A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[35]  James L. McClelland,et al.  More Words but Still No Lexicon : Reply to Besner et al . ( 1990 ) , 1990 .

[36]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Phonologically mediated access to meaning for Kanji: Is a rows still a rose in Japanese Kanji? , 1993 .

[37]  Veronika Coltheart,et al.  When a ROWS is a ROSE: Phonological Effects in Written Word Comprehension , 1994 .

[38]  C. Perfetti,et al.  VERY EARLY PHONOLOGICAL ACTIVATION IN CHINESE READING , 1995 .

[39]  A Pollatsek,et al.  The activation of phonology during silent Chinese word reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Does Word Identification Proceed From Spelling to Sound to Meaning , 1991 .

[41]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Pseudohomophone Naming and the Word Frequency Effect , 1992 .

[42]  H. Shu,et al.  Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  Li Hai Tan,et al.  Activation of phonological codes before access to character meaning in written Chinese , 1996 .

[44]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[45]  M J Chen,et al.  Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[46]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phonological access of the lexicon: evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.