What Happens After an Elevated PSA Test: The Experience of 13,591 Veterans

BackgroundThe occurrence and timing of prostate biopsy following an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test varied considerably in randomized screening trials.ObjectiveExamine practice patterns in routine clinical care in response to an elevated PSA test (≥4 ng/μl) and determine whether time to biopsy was associated with cancer stage at diagnosis.DesignRetrospective cohort study.ParticipantsAll veterans (n = 13,591) in the Pacific Northwest VA Network with a PSA ≥4 ng/μl between 1998 and 2006 and no previous elevated PSA tests or prostate biopsy.Main MeasuresWe assessed follow-up care including additional PSA testing, urology consults, and biopsies. We compared stage at diagnosis for men who were biopsied within 24 months vs. those men biopsied and diagnosed >24 months after the elevated PSA test.Key ResultsTwo-thirds of patients received follow-up evaluation within 24 months of the elevated PSA test: 32.8% of men underwent a biopsy, 15.5% attended a urology visit but were not biopsied, and 18.8% had a subsequent normal PSA test. Younger age, higher PSA levels, more prior PSA tests, no co-payment requirements, existing urologic conditions, low body mass index, and low comorbidity scores were associated with more complete follow-up. Among men who underwent radical prostatectomy, a delayed diagnosis was not significantly associated with having a pathologically advanced-stage cancer (T3/T4), although we found an increased likelihood of presenting with stage T2C relative to stage T2A or T2B cancer.ConclusionsFollow-up after an elevated PSA test is highly variable with more than a third of men receiving care that could be considered incomplete. A delayed diagnosis was not associated with poorer prognosis.

[1]  D. Bates,et al.  Psychological effects of a suspicious prostate cancer screening test followed by a benign biopsy result. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  Y. Taylor,et al.  Patterns in prostate-specific antigen test use and digital rectal examinations in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002-2006. , 2009, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[3]  H. Quan,et al.  Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data , 2005, Medical care.

[4]  D. Federman,et al.  Informed consent for PSA screening: does it happen? , 1999, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[5]  D. Merenstein A piece of my mind. Winners and losers. , 2004, JAMA.

[6]  Adam S. Kibel,et al.  Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study , 2009 .

[7]  F. Gilliland,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen testing practices and outcomes , 1998, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[8]  J. Goodwin,et al.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist use in men without a cancer registry diagnosis of prostate cancer , 2008, BMC health services research.

[9]  Barnett S Kramer,et al.  Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher,et al.  Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study). , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  M. Brundage,et al.  Practical issues in assisting shared decision‐making , 2000, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[12]  Steven H. Woolf,et al.  Patient Education on Prostate Cancer Screening and Involvement in Decision Making , 2007, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[13]  C. Maynard,et al.  Data resources in the Department of Veterans Affairs. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[14]  Peter H Gann,et al.  Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[15]  G. Annas,et al.  Medical Malpractice Implications of PSA Testing for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer , 1997, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[16]  I. Thompson,et al.  Yearly prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination fluctuations in a screened population. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[17]  G. Murphy,et al.  American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: Update 1997 , 1997, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[18]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Large‐scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: Program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trial , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[19]  A. D'Amico,et al.  American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Update 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[20]  A. Lu,et al.  Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen levels between 2 and 22 ng./ml. correlate poorly with post-radical prostatectomy cancer morphology: prostate specific antigen cure rates appear constant between 2 and 9 ng./ml. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[21]  I. Nyirjesy Enthusiasm for Cancer Screening in the United States , 2008 .

[22]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language , 2005, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[23]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[24]  Richard L. Morrill,et al.  METROPOLITAN, URBAN, AND RURAL COMMUTING AREAS: TOWARD A BETTER DEPICTION OF THE UNITED STATES SETTLEMENT SYSTEM , 1999 .

[25]  S. Goodrich,et al.  A Piece of My Mind , 2014 .

[26]  Robert J Volk,et al.  Trials of decision aids for prostate cancer screening: a systematic review. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[27]  M. Elhilali,et al.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia: from A - Z. , 2003, The Canadian journal of urology.

[28]  Stacey L Sheridan,et al.  Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[29]  J. Gohagan,et al.  Prostate cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial: update on findings from the initial four rounds of screening in a randomized trial , 2008, BJU international.

[30]  P. Loehrer PSA Screening Among Elderly Men With Limited Life Expectancies , 2008 .

[31]  E. Yano,et al.  Urologic Diseases in America Project , 2005 .

[32]  D. Lishner,et al.  Rural definitions for health policy and research. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[33]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[34]  Purushottam W. Laud,et al.  An Algorithm for the Use of Medicare Claims Data to Identify Women with Incident Breast Cancer , 2004 .

[35]  Stephen L. Hillis,et al.  Prevalence of delayed clinician response to elevated prostate-specific antigen values. , 2008, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[36]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  G. Reiber,et al.  Veterans Using and Uninsured Veterans Not Using Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care , 2007, Public health reports.

[38]  David Chia,et al.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.