Since PowerPoint was introduced in the late 1980s, this presentation software has attracted its share of advocates and detractors, both in industry and academia. Although PowerPoint is widely used, it may not be the best fit for all purposes in the engineering classroom, and there are many other classroom technologies available to supplement or use in place of it. An innovative survey of engineering faculty at a large public research university in the Midwest reveals which educational technologies they use in their classrooms, the reasons for their choices, and any technological limitations they believe need to be addressed to help faculty present instructional content as effectively as possible. Future work may include a review of new and additional technologies available to complement or replace existing educational technology in the engineering classroom.
[1]
Mary Ann Bowman,et al.
Gender and use of instructional technologies: A study of university faculty
,
1997
.
[2]
D. Michele Jacobsen,et al.
Adoption Patterns of Faculty Who Integrate Computer Technology for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
,
1998
.
[3]
Edward R. Tufte,et al.
The cognitive style of PowerPoint
,
2003
.
[4]
H.M. Grady,et al.
From chalkboard to PowerPoint to the Web: a continuum of technology
,
2004,
International Professional Communication Conference, 2004. IPCC 2004. Proceedings..