Rheumatoid arthritis bone erosion volumes on CT and MRI: reliability and correlations with erosion scores on CT, MRI and radiography

Objectives: To investigate intramodality and intermodality agreements of CT and MRI erosion volumes in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to compare the volumes with erosion scores for CT, MRI and radiography. Methods: In total, 17 patients with RA and four healthy controls underwent unilateral CT, MRI and radiography of second to fifth MCP joints in one hand. Erosion volumes (using OSIRIS software) and scores were determined from CT, MRI and radiography (scores only). Results: CT, MRI and radiography detected 77, 62 and 12 erosions, respectively. On CT, the mean erosion volume was 26 mm3 (median 10; range 0 to 248) and 30 mm3 (18; 1 to 163) on MRI. Total erosion volumes (per patient/control) were 97 mm3 (29; 0 to 485) on CT and 90 mm3 (46; 0 to 389) on MRI. For volumes, Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.96 to 0.99 (CT vs CT), 0.95 to 0.98 (MRI vs MRI) and 0.64 to 0.89 (CT vs MRI), all p<0.01. MRI erosion volumes correlated with the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (OMERACT RAMRIS) erosion scores (0.91 to 0.99; p<0.01) and the Sharp/van der Heijde erosion score (0.49 to 0.63; p<0.01). Conclusion: Very high intramodality and high intermodality agreements of CT and MRI erosion volumes were found, encouraging further testing in longitudinal studies. A close correlation with CT and MRI erosion volumes supports the OMERACT RAMRIS erosion score as a valid measure of joint destruction in RA.

[1]  D Loreck,et al.  Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  Neal Stewart,et al.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 3: an international multicenter reliability study using the RA-MRI Score. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[3]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis , 2000, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  James Woodburn,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a more precise image or just a more expensive one? , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  J. Edmonds,et al.  The EULAR–OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas: the metacarpophalangeal joints , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  Tore K Kvien,et al.  Reliability and sensitivity to change of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score in a multireader, longitudinal setting. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  M. Ostergaard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis , 2000, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

[8]  N Stewart,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals a high prevalence of erosions at four months after symptom onset , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[9]  Paul Bird,et al.  Computerized measurement of magnetic resonance imaging erosion volumes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with existing magnetic resonance imaging scoring systems and standard clinical outcome measures. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. , 2000, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  F. McQueen,et al.  Detection of erosions in the rheumatoid hand; a comparative study of multidetector computerized tomography versus magnetic resonance scanning. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[12]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints , 2006, Arthritis research & therapy.

[13]  J. Edmonds,et al.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 5: an international multicenter reliability study using computerized MRI erosion volume measurements. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[14]  H. Thomsen,et al.  Conventional radiography requires a MRI-estimated bone volume loss of 20% to 30% to allow certain detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints , 2006, Arthritis research & therapy.

[15]  Paul Bird,et al.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[16]  Paul Bird,et al.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 4: an international multicenter longitudinal study using the RA-MRI Score. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.