Frequency selectivity of single cochlear-nerve fibers based on the temporal response pattern to two-tone signals.

The physiological basis of auditory frequency selectivity was investigated by recording the temporal response patterns of single cochlear-nerve fibers in the cat. The characteristic frequency and sharpness of tuning was determined for low-frequency cochlear-nerve fibers with two-tone signals whose frequency components were of equal amplitude and starting phase. The measures were compared with those obtained with sinusoidal signals. The two-tone characteristic frequency (2TCF) is defined as the arithmetic-center frequency at which the fiber is synchronized to both signal frequencies in equal measure. The 2TCF closely corresponds to the characteristic frequency as determined by the frequency threshold curve. Moreover, the 2TCF changes relatively little (2%-12%) over a 60-dB intensity range. The 2TCF generally shifts upward with increasing intensity for cochlear-nerve fibers tuned to frequencies below 1 kHz and shifts downward as a function of intensity for units with characteristic frequencies (CF's) above 1 kHz. The shifts in the 2TCF are considerably smaller than those observed with sinusoidal signals. Filter functions were derived from the synchronization pattern to the two-tone signal by varying the frequency of one of the components over the fiber's response area while maintaining the other component at the 2TCF. The frequency selectivity of the two-tone filter function was determined by dividing the vector strength to the variable frequency signal by the vector strength to the CF tone. The filter function was measured 10 dB down from the peak (2T Q 10 dB) and compared with the Q 10 dB of the frequency threshold curve. The correlation between the two measures of frequency selectivity was 0.72. The 2T Q 10 dB does change as a function of intensity. The magnitude and direction of the change is dependent on the sharpness of tuning at low and moderate sound-pressure levels (SPL's). The selectivity of the more sharply tuned fibers (2T Q 10 dB greater than 3) diminishes at intensities above 60 dB SPL. However, the broadening of selectivity is relatively small in comparison to discharge rate-based measures of selectivity. The selectivity of the more broadly tuned units remains unchanged or improves slightly at similar intensity levels. The present data indicate that the frequency selectivity and tuning of low-frequency cochlear-nerve fibers are relatively stable over a 60-dB range of SPL's when measured in terms of their temporal discharge properties.

[1]  E. F. Evans,et al.  Pitch and Cochlear Nerve Fibre Temporal Discharge Patterns , 1938 .

[2]  J E Hind,et al.  Coding of information pertaining to paired low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J. E. Rose,et al.  Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  P Kuyper,et al.  Triggered correlation. , 1968, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[5]  M. Sachs,et al.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J E Hind,et al.  Time structure of discharges in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey in response to complex periodic sounds. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  J. E. Rose,et al.  Some effects of stimulus intensity on response of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  P J Abbas,et al.  Two-tone suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: extension of a stimulus-response relationship. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  N. Kiang,et al.  Acoustic trauma in cats. Cochlear pathology and auditory-nerve activity. , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[11]  C. D. Geisler,et al.  Two-tone suppression in auditory nerve of the cat: rate-intensity and temporal analyses. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  M. Sachs,et al.  Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  M. Sachs,et al.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Cochlear partition vibration--recent views. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  E. Javel,et al.  Suppression of auditory nerve responses I: temporal analysis, intensity effects and suppression contours. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Reverse correlation study of cochlear filtering in normal and pathological guinea pig ears , 1982, Hearing Research.

[18]  C D Geisler,et al.  Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  C D Geisler,et al.  Comparison of the responses of auditory nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables with predictions from linear models. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Speech coding in the auditory nerve: I. Vowel-like sounds. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.