Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology

There might not be a specific nano-ethics, but there definitely is an ethics of new & emerging science and technology (NEST), with characteristic tropes and patterns of moral argumentation. Ethical discussion in and around nanoscience and technology reflects such NEST-ethics. We offer an inventory of the arguments, and show patterns in their evolution, in arenas full of proponents and opponents. We also show that there are some nano-specific issues: in how size matters, and when agency is delegated to smart devices. Our overall approach is a pragmatist ethics, and we conclude that struggle (and learning) might be more productive than models emphasizing consensus.

[1]  Joachim Schummer,et al.  Discovering the nanoscale , 2004 .

[2]  Michiel Korthals,et al.  Ethics in a Technological Culture , 2002 .

[3]  Contributions from Social Studies of Science and Constructive Technology Assessment , 2002 .

[4]  A. Rip.  Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists , 2006, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[5]  S. Washburn,et al.  Perspectives and prospects. , 1967, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  René von Schomberg,et al.  Implementing the Precautionary Principle , 2006 .

[7]  Knut H. Sørensen,et al.  Shaping technology, guiding policy: concepts, spaces and tools , 2002 .

[8]  D. Collingridge.  The social control of technology , 1980 .

[9]  A. Daar,et al.  ‘Mind the gap’: science and ethics in nanotechnology , 2003, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[10]  William R. Caspary.  Dewey on Democracy , 2000 .

[11]  U. Beck,et al.  Gegengifte : die organisierte Unverantwortlichkeit , 1988 .

[12]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[13]  Bert Gordijn,et al.  Nanoethics: From utopian dreams and apocalyptic nightmares towards a more balanced view , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[14]  Michiel Korthals,et al.  Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture , 2002 .

[15]  J. Farman,et al.  Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000 , 2002 .

[16]  H. Achterhuis.  De moralisering van apparaten , 1995 .

[17]  Tsjalling Swierstra.  Moral Vocabularies and Public Debate , 2002 .

[18]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[19]  Arie Rip,et al.  Identifying Loci for Influencing the Dynamics of Technological Development , 2002 .

[20]  Patrick Cohendet,et al.  The economic dynamics of fuel cell technologies , 2003 .

[21]  René von Schomberg,et al.  Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects , 2006 .

[22]  R. L. Mahajan,et al.  Midstream Modulation of Nanotechnology in an Academic Research Laboratory , 2006 .

[23]  P. Verbeek,et al.  What things do , 2005 .

[24]  Susanne K. Schmidt,et al.  Coordinating Technology: Studies in the International Standardization of Telecommunications , 1997 .

[25]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[26]  James Wilsdon,et al.  Governing at the Nanoscale: People, Policies and Emerging Technologies , 2006 .

[27]  Ken Wallace,et al.  Better by design , 1989 .

[28]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Nanotechnology Risk Governance , 2008 .

[29]  Bernard Williams,et al.  Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. , 1988 .

[30]  Michiel Korthals,et al.  Ethics in Technological Culture: A Programmatic Proposal for a Pragmatist Approach , 2004, Science, technology & human values.

[31]  Arie Rip,et al.  Antagonistic Patterns and New Technologies , 1998 .

[32]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[33]  Jürgen Altmann,et al.  Military, Arms Control, and Security Aspects of Nanotechnology , 2004 .

[34]  M. Douglas,et al.  Risk and Culture , 1983 .

[35]  Tsjalling Swierstra,et al.  Moral vocabularies and public debate: The cases of cloning and new reproductive technologies. , 2002 .

[36]  Ulrich Beck,et al.  Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk , 1995 .

[37]  M. Douglas,et al.  Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers , 1983 .

[38]  P. Verbeek,et al.  Materializing Morality , 2006 .

[39]  Armin Grunwald,et al.  Nanotechnology — A new field of ethical inquiry? , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[40]  R. van Est,et al.  Om het kleine te waarderen... Een schets van nanotechnologie: publiek debat, toepassingsgebieden en maatschappelijke aandachtspunten , 2004 .

[41]  P. Verbeek.  What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design , 2005 .

[42]  Holger Schütz,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: Understanding amplification of complex risk issues: the risk story model applied to the EMF case , 2003 .

[43]  Stuart Hall,et al.  Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman , 1997 .

[44]  James Wilsdon,et al.  BETTER HUMANS? THE POLITICS OF HUMAN ENHANCEMENT AND LIFE EXTENSION , 2006 .

[45]  Sheldon Krimsky,et al.  Genetic Alchemy: The Social History of the Recombinant DNA Controversy , 1984 .