“Liking” and “Take Away” Preferences for Mexican Consumers: Cross‐Cultural Comparison with Thais for Psychological Style

There are reports in the literature that for paired preference tests with a “No Preference” option, Mexican consumers have a lower frequency of “No Preference” responses than Thais. For a more exact comparison of these differences in psychophysical style, Mexican consumers performed preference tests using, as closely as possible, the experimental method used in the Thai experiments. Comparison between this study and the Thai studies confirmed the differences in “No Preference” frequencies, suggesting a systematic cross-cultural effect of psychophysical style. Mexican consumers also performed “take away” preferences for the first time and their results corresponded more with the regular paired preference tests than was the case with Thais. Practical Applications Paired preference tests are a subset of measures available for consumer acceptance. Considering the importance of efforts to predict consumer acceptance, it is essential to understand the variables and biases associated with such tests. Because cross-cultural measurement is becoming more critical in a globalized world, any systematic cross-cultural differences should not be ignored. The present study investigated a possible stable cross-cultural difference with the use of paired preference tests between two potential markets. For companies that sell their products in a variety of countries, such differences will need to be taken into account when interpreting paired preference data and accordingly are worthy of investigation.

[1]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[2]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  Paired preference data with a no-preference option – Statistical tests for comparison with placebo data , 2014 .

[3]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  USE OF PURCHASE PREFERENCE OPTIONS TO INCREASE “NO PREFERENCE” FREQUENCIES IN PLACEBO PREFERENCE TESTS , 2009 .

[4]  J. Prescott Comparisons of taste perceptions and preferences of Japanese and Australian consumers: overview and implications for cross-cultural sensory research , 1998 .

[5]  Sukanya Wichchukit,et al.  Paired preference tests: ‘Liking’, ‘Buying’ and ‘Take Away’ preferences , 2010 .

[6]  K. Chapman,et al.  EXPECTATIONS AND STABILITY OF PREFERENCE CHOICE , 2006 .

[7]  L. Cobiac,et al.  Dietary habits and the perception and liking of sweetness among Australian and Malaysian students: a cross-cultural study. , 2000 .

[8]  E. Monteleone,et al.  Hedonic ratings and consumption of school lunch among preschool children. , 2009 .

[9]  L. Chung,et al.  A cross-cultural comparison of the sensory characteristics of perilla oil by American, Chinese, and Korean panels , 2012, Food Science and Biotechnology.

[10]  Chuansheng Chen,et al.  Response Style and Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales Among East Asian and North American Students , 1995 .

[11]  L. O’Neill,et al.  The impact of variations in flavour compounds on meat acceptability : a comparison of Japanese and New Zealand consumers , 2001 .

[12]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  Estimation of the Thurstonian model for the 2-AC protocol , 2012 .

[13]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED 9‐POINT HEDONIC SCALES: A CROSS CULTURAL STUDY WITH AMERICAN, JAPANESE AND KOREAN CONSUMERS , 2003 .

[14]  Sukanya Wichchukit,et al.  VARIOUS PAIRED PREFERENCE TESTS: EXPERIMENTER EFFECT ON “TAKE HOME” CHOICE , 2010 .

[15]  Ana I. Sanjuán,et al.  Consumers’ acceptability and actual choice. An exploratory research on cured ham in Spain , 2009 .

[16]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  The paired preference test and the 'No Preference' option : Was odesky correct? , 2005 .

[17]  L. Chung,et al.  Cross-cultural comparisons among the sensory characteristics of fermented soybean using Korean and Japanese descriptive analysis panels. , 2007, Journal of food science.

[18]  Jian Bi,et al.  A THURSTONIAN MODEL AND STATISTICAL INFERENCE FOR THE 2-ALTERNATIVE CHOICE TEST WITH BOTH TEST PAIRS AND PLACEBO PAIRS , 2015 .

[19]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  PAIRED PREFERENCE TESTS USING PLACEBO PAIRS AND DIFFERENT RESPONSE OPTIONS FOR CHIPS, ORANGE JUICES AND COOKIES , 2008 .

[20]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  Be your own placebo: A double paired preference test approach for establishing expected frequencies , 2007 .

[21]  Daniel M. Ennis,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THREE COMMONLY USED METHODS FOR TREATING NO PREFERENCE VOTES , 2012 .

[22]  Sukanya Wichchukit,et al.  ‘Liking’, ‘Buying’, ‘Choosing’ and ‘Take Away’ preference tests for varying degrees of hedonic disparity , 2011 .

[23]  Jayson L. Lusk,et al.  External validity of the food values scale , 2011 .

[24]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[25]  A. Krystallis,et al.  Quality Assurance Labels as Drivers of Customer Loyalty in the Case of Traditional Food Products , 2012 .

[26]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  The triadic preference test , 2015 .

[27]  Joseph M. Kamen,et al.  Food Preferences of Men in the U. S. Armed Forces , 1960 .

[28]  Kwang-Ok Kim,et al.  Comparison in Use of the 9-Point Hedonic Scale between Americans, Chinese, Koreans, and Thai , 1998 .

[29]  Daniel M. Ennis,et al.  Accounting for no difference/preference responses or ties in choice experiments , 2012 .

[30]  Maurice G. O'Sullivan,et al.  Cross-cultural comparisons of Japanese and Australian responses to manipulations of sourness, saltiness and bitterness in foods , 1998 .

[31]  Fang Zhong,et al.  Paired Preference Tests with Reversed Hidden Demand Characteristics , 2014 .

[32]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  PAIRED PREFERENCE TESTS: d′ VALUES FROM MEXICAN CONSUMERS WITH VARIOUS RESPONSE OPTIONS , 2005 .

[33]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  SOURCES OF ERROR AND THE NO-PREFERENCE OPTION IN DAIRY PRODUCT TESTING , 2005 .

[34]  J. M. Murray,et al.  A STUDY OF CHINESE-ORIGIN AND EUROPEAN-ORIGIN AUSTRALIAN CONSUMERS’ TEXTURE PREFERENCES USING A NOVEL EXTRUDED PRODUCT , 2001 .

[35]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCE WITH CONTROLS FOR RESPONSE BIAS OPERATING IN THE TEST SITUATION: A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE USING OMEGA‐3 ENRICHED WHOLEGRAIN BREADS WITH ECUADORIAN CONSUMERS , 2010 .

[36]  Kwang-Ok Kim,et al.  PAIRED PREFERENCE TESTS: USE OF PLACEBO STIMULI WITH LIKING AND BUYING PREFERENCES , 2011 .

[37]  D. G. Laing,et al.  RESPONSES OF JAPANESE AND AUSTRALIANS TO SWEETNESS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIFFERENT FOODS , 1994 .

[38]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  CONSUMERS REPORT PREFERENCES WHEN THEY SHOULD NOT: A CROSS‐CULTURAL STUDY , 2003 .

[39]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  HOW WELL DOES THE 9‐POINT HEDONIC SCALE PREDICT PURCHASE FREQUENCY? , 2005 .

[40]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  PAIRED PREFERENCE TESTS: “50:50” AND “ALTERNATING” NO PREFERENCES , 2008 .

[41]  John M. Ennis,et al.  Transitioning from proportion of discriminators to a more meaningful measure of sensory difference , 2014 .