Comprehensive evaluation of PCA-based finite element modelling of the human femur.

Computed tomography (CT)-based finite element (FE) reconstructions describe shape and density distribution of bones. Both shape and density distribution, however, can vary a lot between individuals. Shape/density indexation (usually achieved by principal component analysis--PCA) can be used to synthesize realistic models, thus overcoming the shortage of CT-based models, and helping e.g. to study fracture determinants, or steer prostheses design. The aim of this study was to describe a PCA-based statistical modelling algorithm, and test it on a large CT-based population of femora, to see if it can accurately describe and reproduce bone shape, density distribution, and biomechanics. To this aim, 115 CT-datasets showing normal femoral anatomy were collected and characterized. Isotopological FE meshes were built. Shape and density indexation procedures were performed on the mesh database. The completeness of the database was evaluated through a convergence study. The accuracy in reconstructing bones not belonging to the indexation database was evaluated through (i) leave-one-out tests (ii) comparison of calculated vs. in-vitro measured strains. Fifty indexation modes for shape and 40 for density were necessary to achieve reconstruction errors below pixel size for shape, and below 10% for density. Similar errors for density, and slightly higher errors for shape were obtained when reconstructing bones not belonging to the database. The in-vitro strain prediction accuracy of the reconstructed FE models was comparable to state-of-the-art studies. In summary, the results indicate that the proposed statistical modelling tools are able to accurately describe a population of femora through finite element models.

[1]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Prasanth B. Nair,et al.  Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  A Statistical Model of Shape and Bone Mineral Density Distribution of the Proximal Femur for Fracture Risk Assessment , 2011, MICCAI.

[4]  Prasanth B. Nair,et al.  Use of a statistical model of the whole femur in a large scale, multi-model study of femoral neck fracture risk. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  MRI Bone Segmentation Using Deformable Models and Shape Priors , 2008, MICCAI.

[6]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Statistical Finite Element Model for Bone Shape and Biomechanical Properties , 2006, MICCAI.

[7]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  W. Taylor,et al.  Physiologically based boundary conditions in finite element modelling. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Travis D. Eliason,et al.  Statistical shape modeling describes variation in tibia and femur surface geometry between Control and Incidence groups from the osteoarthritis initiative database. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  H. Skinner,et al.  Effect of force direction on femoral fracture load for two types of loading conditions , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  Fabio Baruffaldi,et al.  Specialised CT scan protocols for 3-D pre-operative planning of total hip replacement. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions. , 2009, Bone.

[13]  W. Kalender,et al.  The European Spine Phantom--a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[14]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Assessment of the 3-D shape and mechanics of the proximal femur using a shape template and a bone mineral density image , 2011, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[15]  Nils Reimers,et al.  Optimisation of orthopaedic implant design using statistical shape space analysis based on level sets , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Estimation of 3D shape, internal density and mechanics of proximal femur by combining bone mineral density images with shape and density templates , 2012, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[17]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Agnes Grünerbl,et al.  3D image segmentation using combined shape-intensity prior models , 2007, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[19]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Evaluation of the generality and accuracy of a new mesh morphing procedure for the human femur. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Training Models of Shape from Sets of Examples , 1992, BMVC.

[21]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Assessment of the individual fracture risk of the proximal femur by using statistical appearance models. , 2010, Medical physics.

[22]  J. Keyak,et al.  Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  Paul J. Rullkoetter,et al.  Development of subject-specific and statistical shape models of the knee using an efficient segmentation and mesh-morphing approach , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[24]  P. Noble,et al.  A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[25]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Patient-specific finite element analysis of the human femur--a double-blinded biomechanical validation. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Statistical models of shape - optimisation and evaluation , 2008 .

[27]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  H. Tullos,et al.  The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Multimod Data Manager: A tool for data fusion , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[30]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[31]  W. Skalli,et al.  Semi-automated stereoradiographic upper limb 3D reconstructions using a combined parametric and statistical model: a preliminary study , 2012, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[32]  M Taylor,et al.  Determination of suitable sample sizes for multi-patient based finite element studies. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[33]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Validation of subject-specific automated p-FE analysis of the proximal femur. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.