Effect of disciplinary content of a simulation on open-ended problem-solving strategies

There is a long-standing debate about so-called generic vs. domain- or context-specific problem-solving skills and strategies. To investigate this issue, we developed a pair of structurally and functionally similar computer simulations and used them in an experimental study with undergraduate students from all fields of study. One, described to users as a teaching tool based on current entomology research, featured three species of ants whose tasks could change as a result of encounters with each other. The other, which we call a non-disciplinary simulation, featured three types of abstract moving shapes whose color could change after a collision. Users received no information about the latter, not even that it was a simulation. Both simulations, which students used in succession, allowed users to change the number and types of objects, and to move them freely on the screen. We told students that the problem was to describe and explain what occurred on the screen, and asked them to explain, while they were working with the simulation, what they observed, what they did and why. We conducted a first, quantitative analysis of various “surface

[1]  Louise Sauvé,et al.  Distinguishing between Games and Simulations: A Systematic Review , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Improving problem solving and creativity through use of complex-dynamic simulations , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  Begoña Gros,et al.  Digital Games in Education , 2007 .

[5]  Nicholas Taylor,et al.  Digital Games for Education: When Meanings Play , 2007, DiGRA Conference.

[6]  M. Couture,et al.  Simulations informatiques adisciplinaires et résolution de problèmes ouverts : une étude exploratoire auprès d’étudiants en formation des maîtres , 2008 .

[7]  S. Ian Robertson,et al.  Problem-solving , 2001, Human Thinking.

[8]  Gerald W. Meisner,et al.  Virtual Interactive Laboratories and e-Learning , 2005 .

[9]  P. Soderberg,et al.  An examination of problem-based teaching and learning in population genetics and evolution using EVOLVE, a computer simulation , 2003 .

[10]  Yongjoo Cho,et al.  First-Person Science Inquiry in the Field , 2001, EGVE/IPT.

[11]  John R. Mergendoller,et al.  Developing a problem-based learning simulation: An economics unit on trade , 2004 .

[12]  Ton de Jong.  Computer simulations. Technological advances in inquiry learning. , 2006, Science.

[13]  Wendy K. Adams,et al.  Problem Solving Skill Evaluation Instrument — Validation Studies , 2007 .

[14]  Lyn D. English,et al.  CHILDREN'S USE OF DOMAIN-SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOMAIN-GENERAL STRATEGIES IN NOVEL PROBLEM SOLVING , 1992 .

[15]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[16]  Rendas,et al.  A computer simulation designed for problem‐based learning , 1999, Medical education.

[17]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Problem-solving transfer. , 1996 .

[18]  Erno Lehtinen,et al.  Computer‐supported Problem‐based Learning in the Research Methodology Domain , 2005 .

[19]  Annette Kluge,et al.  Performance Assessments With Microworlds and Their Difficulty , 2008 .

[20]  Harold F. O'Neil,et al.  Perspectives on computer-based performance assessment of problem solving , 1999 .

[21]  David E. Anderson.  Computer Simulations in the Psychology Laboratory , 1982 .

[22]  R Ruurd Taconis,et al.  Teaching Science Problem Solving: An Overview of Experimental Work. , 2001 .

[23]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[24]  Jianwei Zhang,et al.  Supporting scientific discovery learning in a simulation environment , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..