Aerodynamics of Esophageal Voice Production with and without a Groningen Voice Prosthesis
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Hk Schutte,et al. The effect of F0/F1 coincidence in soprano high notes on pressure at the glottis , 1986 .
[2] H. Mahieu,et al. The Groningen Button Results , 1986 .
[3] J. Moon,et al. Airway resistances of Blom-Singer and Panje Low Pressure tracheoesophageal puncture prostheses. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[4] J. Berg,et al. Direct and indirect determination of the mean subglottic pressure; sound level, mean subglottic pressure, mean air flow, subglottic power and efficiency of a male voice for the vowel (a). , 1956, Folia phoniatrica.
[5] N. Isshiki,et al. AIR VOLUME AND AIR FLOW RELATIONSHIPS OF SIX MALE ESOPHAGEAL SPEAKERS. , 1965, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[6] N. Isshiki,et al. AIR INTAKE AND USAGE IN ESOPHAGEAL SPEECH. , 1965, Acta oto-laryngologica.
[7] H. K. Schutte,et al. Aerodynamic properties of the low-resistance Groningen button. , 1991, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.
[8] W. Panje,et al. Prosthetic Vocal Rehabilitation following Laryngectomy , 1981, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.
[9] B Weinberg,et al. Aerodynamic and myoelastic contributions to tracheoesophageal voice production. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[10] H. K. Schutte,et al. The Groningen button: results of in vivo measurements. , 1987, Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie.
[11] J. Kirchner,et al. The pharynx after laryngectomy. Changes in Its Structure and Function , 1963, The Laryngoscope.
[12] N. Isshiki,et al. VOCAL AND AIR USE CHARACTERISTICS OF A SUPERIOR MALE ESOPHAGEAL SPEAKER. , 1965, Folia phoniatrica.
[13] J. van den Berg,et al. Crico-pharyngeal sphincter, pitch, intensity and fluency in oesophageal speech. , 1959, Practica oto-rhino-laryngologica.
[14] M. Singer,et al. An Endoscopic Technique for Restoration of Voice after Laryngectomy , 1980, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.
[15] B Weinberg,et al. Similarities between glossopharyngeal breathing and injection methods of air intake for esophageal speech. , 1970, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[16] F. Hilgers,et al. A new low‐resistance, self‐retaining prosthesis (Provox™) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy , 1990, The Laryngoscope.
[17] H. K. Schutte,et al. A new prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy , 1982, Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology.
[18] B. Weinberg,et al. Impact of tracheoesophageal puncture prosthesis airway resistance on in-vivo phonatory performance. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[19] H. K. Schutte,et al. Candida vegetations on silicone voice prostheses. , 1986, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.
[20] B. Weinberg,et al. Aerodynamic properties of four tracheoesophageal puncture prostheses. , 1984, Archives of otolaryngology.
[21] A MOOLENAAR-BIJL,et al. LXXXVII The Importance of Certain Consonants in Esophageal Voice after Laryngectomy , 1953, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.