A Novel Approach to Evaluate the Effect of Neighboring Trees and the Orientation of Tree Social Area on Stem Radial Increment of Norway Spruce Trees

Tree growth depends on many factors such as microsite conditions, vitality, and variations in climate and genetics. It is generally accepted that higher growth indicates both an economic benefit and better vitality of any tree. Here we use a modified approach of evaluating tree social area to study mutual tree competition based on the orientation and shape of trees social area. The investigation was performed in nine Norway spruce stands in the Czech Republic. The objective of this study performed from 2008 to 2012 was to quantify relative tree radial increments with respect to the lowest and highest competition found in specific sectors of tree social area (AS). Specific groups of trees (tree classes) were evaluated according to their classes (dominant, co-dominant and sub-dominant) and their composition status in ninety-degree sectors of AS using established classifying rules. The results showed that a spatially-available area (AA) is an inappropriate parameter for predicting tree growth, whereas AS provided robust explanatory power to predict relative radial growth. Tree size was observed as an important indicator of relative radial increments. A significantly positive correlation was found for a radial increment of sub-dominant trees with the lowest competition from western directions; whereas a negative correlation was observed when the lowest competition was observed from eastern directions. For dominant trees, there was an evident growth reaction only when more than 50% of the AS was oriented towards one of the cardinal points. Individual differences in the orientation of tree AS may be important parameters with regard to competition and its spatial variability within an area surrounding a particular tree and deserve more detailed attention in tree growth models and practice.

[1]  D. Coomes,et al.  Effects of size, competition and altitude on tree growth , 2007 .

[2]  Oscar García,et al.  Scale and spatial structure effects on tree size distributions : implications for growth and yield modelling , 2006 .

[3]  F. Lebourgeois,et al.  Stand density, tree social status and water stress influence allocation in height and diameter growth of Quercus petraea (Liebl.). , 2015, Tree physiology.

[4]  Per‐Anders Esseen,et al.  Tree growth and competition in an old‐growth Picea abies forest of boreal Sweden: influence of tree spatial patterning , 2014 .

[5]  G. Duduman,et al.  The influence of competition and dimensional-spatial characteristics of trees on their radial growth in Old-Growth Slătioara forest, Romania. , 2010 .

[6]  Decheng Zhou,et al.  A meta-analysis on the impacts of partial cutting on forest structure and carbon storage , 2013 .

[7]  A. Barbati,et al.  Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems , 2010 .

[8]  N. Kenkel,et al.  A long‐term study of Pinus banksiana population dynamics , 1997 .

[9]  E. Nevo.  Evolution in action across phylogeny caused by microclimatic stresses at "Evolution Canyon". , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[10]  I. Bella,et al.  A New Competition Model for Individual Trees , 1971 .

[11]  L MartinG,et al.  レジノーザマツ(Pinus resinosa)人工林の直径及び樹高生長予測のための競争の測定及び生長モデルの比較 , 1984 .

[12]  I. Noble,et al.  On the direct effect of clouds and atmospheric particles on the productivity and structure of vegetation , 2001, Oecologia.

[13]  E. Nordheim,et al.  Tree mortality rates and longevity in mature and old‐growth hemlock‐hardwood forests , 2001 .

[14]  Eckart Priesack,et al.  Importance of tree height and social position for drought-related stress on tree growth and mortality , 2016, Trees.

[15]  Craig G. Lorimer,et al.  Tests of age-independent competition indices for individual trees in natural hardwood stands , 1983 .

[16]  P. Cudlín,et al.  Risk evaluation of the climatic change impact on secondary Norway spruce stands as exemplified by the K řtiny Training Forest Enterprise , 2018 .

[17]  E. T. D. Cros,et al.  Variability in beech : budding, height growth and tree form , 1988 .

[18]  A. R. Ek,et al.  A Comparison of Competition Measures and Growth Models for Predicting Plantation Red Pine Diameter and Height Growth , 1984 .

[19]  Aged Forests.  PERFECTING A STAND-DENSITY INDEX FOR EVEN- , 2010 .

[20]  A. Kirchhefer.  The influence of slope aspect on tree-ring growth of Pinus sylvestris L. in northern Norway and its implications for climate reconstruction. , 2000 .

[21]  C. Canham,et al.  A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition : effects of shading versus crowding , 2004 .

[22]  J. Krejza,et al.  Spatially explicit basal area growth of Norway spruce , 2015, Trees.

[23]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Effects of water and temperature , 1985 .

[24]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Observations and assessment of forest carbon dynamics following disturbance in North America , 2012 .

[25]  Jan Cermák,et al.  Electrical measurement of tree root absorbing surfaces by the earth impedance method: 2. Verification based on allometric relationships and root severing experiments. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[26]  J. Klaus,et al.  The relative dominance hypothesis explains interaction dynamics in mixed species Alnus rubra/Pseudotsuga menziesii stands , 2004 .

[27]  E. D. Ford,et al.  Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures , 1975 .

[28]  E Nevo,et al.  Evolution of genome–phenome diversity under environmental stress , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  H. Mäkinen,et al.  Thinning intensity and long-term changes in increment and stem form of Norway spruce trees , 2004 .

[30]  H. Morin,et al.  Spatially explicit structure of natural stands dominated by black spruce , 2013 .

[31]  J. Cermak,et al.  Open field-applicable instrumental methods for structural and functional assessment of whole trees and stands , 2014 .

[32]  H. Peltola,et al.  Sensitivity of growth of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch to climate change and forest management in boreal conditions , 2006 .

[33]  D. Binkley,et al.  Leaf area and light use efficiency patterns of Norway spruce under different thinning regimes and age classes , 2013, Forest ecology and management.

[34]  J. R. Runkle,et al.  Competition, Climate, and Size Effects on Radial Growth in an Old-Growth Hemlock Forest , 2019 .

[35]  W. Keeton,et al.  Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example , 2002 .

[36]  Franz Aurenhammer,et al.  Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure , 1991, CSUR.

[37]  Michael J. Papaik,et al.  Do position and species identity of neighbours matter in 8-15-year-old post harvest mesic stands in the boreal mixedwood? , 2010 .

[38]  J. Bellot,et al.  Assessing components of a competition index to predict growth in an even-aged Pinus nigra stand , 1998, New Forests.

[39]  A. Rigling,et al.  Drought response of five conifer species under contrasting water availability suggests high vulnerability of Norway spruce and European larch , 2013, Global change biology.

[40]  P. Drapeau,et al.  Structural development following fire in black spruce boreal forest , 2005 .

[41]  P. Pulkkinen,et al.  Inherited narrow crown form, harvest index and stem biomass production in Norway spruce, Picea abies. , 1990, Tree physiology.

[42]  Dan Binkley,et al.  Light absorption and use efficiency in forests: Why patterns differ for trees and stands , 2013 .

[43]  L. Wichmann.  Annual Variations in Competition Symmetry in Even-aged Sitka Spruce , 2001 .

[44]  Maša Zorana Ostrogović Sever,et al.  Forest carbon allocation modelling under climate change , 2019, Tree physiology.

[45]  Woodam Chung,et al.  Evaluating tree competition indices as predictors of basal area increment in western Montana forests , 2011 .

[46]  S. Fraver,et al.  Stand and cohort structures of old‐growth Pinus resinosa‐dominated forests of northern Minnesota, USA , 2012 .

[47]  C. Canham,et al.  Above‐ versus below‐ground competitive effects and responses of a guild of temperate tree species , 2009 .

[48]  P. Štěpánek,et al.  Evidence of climate-induced stress of Norway spruce along elevation gradient preceding the current dieback in Central Europe , 2020, Trees.

[49]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Application of ecological field theory in distance-dependent growth modelling , 2002 .

[50]  D. Green,et al.  Competitive interactions in sub-boreal birch–spruce forests differ on opposing slope aspects , 2005 .

[51]  N. C. Kenkel,et al.  Pattern of Self‐Thinning in Jack Pine: Testing the Random Mortality Hypothesis , 1988 .

[52]  Christopher Potter,et al.  Simulating the impacts of disturbances on forest carbon cycling in North America: processes, data, models, and challenges , 2011 .

[53]  M. Lukac,et al.  Belowground biomass functions and expansion factors in high elevation Norway spruce , 2011 .

[54]  C. Bourque,et al.  Carbon and biomass partitioning in balsam fir (Abies balsamea). , 2005, Tree physiology.

[55]  N. Barbier,et al.  Estimates and relationships between aboveground and belowground resource exchange surface areas in a Sitka spruce managed forest. , 2010, Tree physiology.