Presenting uncertainty in health risk assessment: initial studies of its effects on risk perception and trust.

Some analysts suggest that discussing uncertainties in health risk assessments might reduce citizens' perceptions of risk and increase their respect for the risk-assessing agency. We tested this assumption with simulated news stories varying simple displays of uncertainty (e.g., a range of risk estimates, with and without graphics). Subjects from Eugene, Oregon, read one story each, and then answered a questionnaire. Three studies tested between 180 and 272 subjects each. Two focus groups obtained more detailed responses to these stories. The results suggested that (1) people are unfamiliar with uncertainty in risk assessments and in science; (2) people may recognize uncertainty when it is presented simply; (3) graphics may help people recognize uncertainty; (4) reactions to the environmental problems in the stories seemed affected less by presentation of uncertainty than by general risk attitudes and perceptions; (5) agency discussion of uncertainty in risk estimates may signal agency honesty and agency incompetence for some people; and (6) people seem to see lower risk estimates (10(-6), as opposed to 10(-3)) as less credible. These findings, if confirmed, would have important implications for risk communication.

[1]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  P. Slovic,et al.  Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks , 1992, Toxicologic pathology.

[3]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[4]  N. Weinstein,et al.  Agency Communication, Community Outrage, and Perception of Risk Three Simulation Experiments , 1993 .

[5]  Robert E. O'Connor,et al.  Determinants of Risk Perceptions of a Hazardous Waste Site , 1992 .

[6]  G L Carlo,et al.  The interplay of science, values, and experiences among scientists asked to evaluate the hazards of dioxin, radon, and environmental tobacco smoke. , 1992, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  Branden B. Johnson,et al.  Testing the Role of Technical Information in Public Risk Perception , 1992 .

[8]  Joel Huber,et al.  Communication of ambiguous risk information , 1991 .

[9]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[10]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: A Case Study in Communicating Scientific Information , 1989 .

[11]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Graphical Communication of Uncertain Quantities to Nontechnical People , 1987 .

[12]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Modeling the Societal Impact of Fatal Accidents , 1984 .

[13]  Laura M. Davidson,et al.  Natural Disaster and Technological Catastrophe , 1983 .

[14]  S. Bem,et al.  Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. , 1975 .