Analysis of the energy access improvement and its socio-economic impacts in rural areas of developing countries

Abstract Access to modern energy is one of the most basic requirements for development. In rural areas of developing countries, there are a large number of people who do not have access to LPG and depend on traditional biomass such as wood, crop, and dung for cooking. In addition, energy has numerous and complex links with poverty reduction. Therefore, it is important to estimate the impacts of energy access improvement on socio-economic situation in the rural areas of developing countries quantitatively. This study focuses on socio-economic impacts of cooking demand through changes in stoves adopted by the rural households. We have developed an energy-economic model of rural areas in India to analyze the links between energy, income, and health hazard, applying both opportunity cost for using fuelwood and exposure to Resipirable Suspended Particulate Matter (RSPM). As a result of the analysis, there is a positive relation between the opportunity cost and the average RSPM exposure of women in the rural areas. Following to increase in the opportunity cost, that is, income, the cost of an improved wood stove becomes relatively lower first than that of a traditional wood stove, and then a gas stove attains price competitiveness. It is achieved that the average RSPM exposure is below the WHO and Japanese criteria for Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM), 190 and 100 [μg/m3], at the opportunity cost of US$9 and 15/GJ, respectively.

[1]  Toshihiko Nakata,et al.  Energy-economic models and the environment , 2004 .

[2]  Priyantha D.C. Wijayatunga,et al.  Analysis of household cooking energy demand and its environmental impact in Sri Lanka , 2002 .

[3]  D. K. Subramanian,et al.  Domestic energy consumption patterns in Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka State, India , 2000 .

[4]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[5]  D. Bailey,et al.  Annual Report 2004-05 , 2005 .

[6]  Geoffrey McNicoll,et al.  Human Development Report 1995. , 1995 .

[7]  M. Subramaniam Whose Interests? , 2000 .

[8]  Availability of kerosene to rural households: a case study from India , 2005 .

[9]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Biomass and Petroleum Energy Futures in Africa , 2005, Science.

[10]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  Implications of changes in household stoves and fuel use in China , 2004 .

[11]  Mark Howells,et al.  A model of household energy services in a low-income rural African village , 2004 .

[12]  Niels Jungbluth,et al.  Life cycle inventory for cooking : Some results for the use of liquefied petroleum gas and kerosene as cooking fuels in India , 1997 .

[13]  M. Greeley Energy and poverty. , 1987 .

[14]  Daniel Spreng,et al.  On Measuring Energy Poverty in Indian Households , 2004 .

[15]  Rangan Banerjee,et al.  Comparison of options for distributed generation in India , 2006 .

[16]  M. Diesendorf,et al.  Model for empowering rural poor through renewable energy technologies in Bangladesh , 2001 .

[17]  Toshihiko Nakata,et al.  Analysis of the impact of electricity grid interconnection between Korea and Japan—Feasibility study for energy network in Northeast Asia , 2006 .

[18]  R. Sarmah,et al.  Energy profiles of rural domestic sector in six un-electrified villages of Jorhat district of Assam , 2002 .

[19]  P. Abdul Salam,et al.  Emission factors of wood and charcoal-fired cookstoves , 2002 .

[20]  Tara C. Kandpal,et al.  Biofuel mix for cooking in rural areas: Implications for financial viability of improved cookstoves , 1996 .

[21]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Evaluating the health benefits of transitions in household energy technologies in Kenya , 2002 .