Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of four intraoral scanners with 70% reduced inlay and four-unit bridge models of international standard.

The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of 70% reduced inlay and 4-unit bridge models of International Standard (ISO 12836) assessing the accuracy of laboratory scanners to measure the accuracy of intraoral scanner. Four intraoral scanners (CS3500, Trios, Omnicam, and Bluecam) and one laboratory scanner (Ceramill MAP400) were used in this study. The height, depth, length, and angle of the models were measured from thirty scanned stereolithography (STL) images. There were no statistically significant mean deviations in distance accuracy and precision values of scanned images, except the angulation values of the inlay and 4-unit bridge models. The relative errors of inlay model and 4-unit bridge models quantifying the accuracy and precision of obtained mean deviations were less than 0.023 and 0.021, respectively. Thus, inlay and 4-unit bridge models suggested by this study is expected to be feasible tools for testing intraoral scanners.

[1]  Anssi J. Mäkynen,et al.  Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry , 2014 .

[2]  Yijin Ren,et al.  Application of Intra-Oral Dental Scanners in the Digital Workflow of Implantology , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  Jang Hyun Kim,et al.  A semantic network analysis of technological innovation in dentistry: a case of CAD/CAM , 2015 .

[4]  Jiuxiang Lin,et al.  Comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  E. D. Rekow,et al.  Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[6]  T. Grünheid,et al.  Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. , 2014, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  Sercan Akyalcin,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  Ki-Soo Lee,et al.  A method for mandibular dental arch superimposition using 3D cone beam CT and orthodontic 3D digital model , 2012, Korean journal of orthodontics.

[9]  Woong-Chul Kim,et al.  Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique , 2014, Korean journal of orthodontics.

[10]  Gary D. Hack,et al.  Evaluation of the Accuracy of Six Intraoral Scanning Devices: An in-vitro Investigation. , 2015 .

[11]  Kazuo Hayashi,et al.  Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of new 3-dimensional scanning devices. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  D. Edelhoff,et al.  Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques , 2013, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[13]  Neal Patel,et al.  Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[14]  Yijin Ren,et al.  Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  Parag R. Kachalia,et al.  Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. , 2010, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[16]  Young-Joo Kim,et al.  Development of Image-space Telecentric Lens for Intra-Oral 3D Scanner , 2015 .

[17]  O Schenk The new acquisition unit Cerec AC. , 2009, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[18]  Sebastian B. M. Patzelt,et al.  Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[19]  R. Nedelcu,et al.  Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  D. Naidu,et al.  Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  Xin Yang,et al.  Accuracy of Digital Impressions and Fitness of Single Crowns Based on Digital Impressions , 2015, Materials.

[22]  Tabea V Flügge,et al.  Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[23]  Sebastian B. M. Patzelt,et al.  Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. , 2014, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[24]  W. J. van der Meer,et al.  Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  T Jiang,et al.  Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro. , 2015, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[26]  Dennis J Fasbinder,et al.  The CEREC system: 25 years of chairside CAD/CAM dentistry. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.