Design of Active Sensor Network and Multilevel Data Fusion

Design of a sensing network, and subsequently, the interpretation of data acquired from sensors, are two critical issues in structural health monitoring (SHM). It is understood that the process to identify structural health status is basically an inverse problem, often mathematically ill-posed. This article has the goal of introducing the active sensor network, a spatially distributed sensing structure, designed to deal with the problem of SHM. Data fusion, especially multilevel data fusion, is then presented to face the challenges in data interpretation, which can be considered as a process to establish a posterior belief about a set of propositions like structural damage events on the basis of a set of prior beliefs that are possessed by sensors. A data fusion process is utilized to increase the robustness and reliability of structural condition identification algorithms by reducing imprecision, uncertainties, and incompleteness. There is a wide range of approaches in data fusion, including the algorithms based on voting scheme, Bayesian theory, Dempster–Schafer rules, fuzzy inference, and artificial neural network. Keywords: active sensor network; system design; data fusion; distributed sensing structure

[1]  Steven B. Chase Smarter bridges, why and how? , 2001 .

[2]  J. Assaad,et al.  Signal processing for damage detection using two different array transducers. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[3]  Robert A. Hummel,et al.  On the Use of the Dempster Shafer Model in Information Indexing and Retrieval Applications , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[4]  Lin Ye,et al.  Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: A review , 2006 .

[5]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Quantitative health monitoring of bolted joints using a piezoceramic actuator-sensor , 2004 .

[6]  Lin Ye,et al.  Digital Damage Fingerprints (DDF) and its application in quantitative damage identification , 2005 .

[7]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges , 2005 .

[8]  Ning Xiong,et al.  Multi-sensor management for information fusion: issues and approaches , 2002, Inf. Fusion.

[9]  Krzysztof Wilde,et al.  Application of continuous wavelet transform in vibration based damage detection method for beams and plates , 2006 .

[10]  L. Ye,et al.  A damage identification technique for CF/EP composite laminates using distributed piezoelectric transducers , 2002 .

[11]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Biological and cognitive foundations of intelligent sensor fusion , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[12]  E. Crawley,et al.  Use of piezoelectric actuators as elements of intelligent structures , 1987 .

[13]  K. Tseng,et al.  Smart piezoelectric transducers for in situ health monitoring of concrete , 2004 .

[14]  Xiaoming Wang,et al.  Electro-mechanical dynamic analysis of the piezoelectric stack , 1996 .

[15]  Cajetan M. Akujuobi,et al.  An approach to vibration analysis using wavelets in an application of aircraft health monitoring , 2007 .

[16]  Xiaoming Wang,et al.  An analytical investigation of static models of piezoelectric patches attached to beams and plates , 1997 .

[17]  D. Worlton Experimental Confirmation of Lamb Waves at Megacycle Frequencies , 1961 .

[18]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Some aspects of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory for classification of multi-modality medical images taking partial volume effect into account , 1996, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[19]  Wing Kong Chiu,et al.  Damage Detection in Bonded Repairs using Piezoceramics , 2000 .

[20]  Isabelle Bloch Information combination operators for data fusion: a comparative review with classification , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[21]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals , 2001 .

[22]  Xiaoming Wang,et al.  Multilevel Decision Fusion in a Distributed Active Sensor Network for Structural Damage Detection , 2006 .

[23]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Embedded non-destructive evaluation for structural health monitoring, damage detection, and failure prevention , 2005 .

[24]  Darryll J. Pines,et al.  Status of structural health monitoring of long-span bridges in the United States , 2002 .

[25]  Wing Kong Chiu,et al.  Effects of local stiffness changes and delamination on Lamb wave transmission using surface-mounted piezoelectric transducers , 2002 .

[26]  J Jarzynski,et al.  Time-frequency representations of Lamb waves. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Hani G. Melhem,et al.  Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis , 2004 .

[28]  Xiaomin Deng,et al.  Damage detection with spatial wavelets , 1999 .

[29]  Craig A. Rogers,et al.  Qualitative impedance-based health monitoring of civil infrastructures , 1998 .

[30]  Ya-peng Shen,et al.  On the characterization of piezoelectric actuators attached to structures , 1998 .

[31]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Feasibility of using impedance‐based damage assessment for pipeline structures , 2001 .

[32]  L. Jacobs,et al.  Characterization of adhesive bond properties using Lamb waves , 2000 .