A simplex algorithm whose average number of steps is bounded between two quadratic functions of the smaller dimension

It has been a challenge for mathematicians to confirm theoretically the extremely good performance of simplex-type algorithms for linear programming. In this paper the average number of steps performed by a simplex algorithm, the so-called <italic>self-dual method</italic>, is analyzed. The algorithm is not started at the traditional point (1, … , l)<supscrpt>T</supscrpt>, but points of the form (1, ε, ε<supscrpt>2</supscrpt>, …)<supscrpt>T</supscrpt>, with ε sufficiently small, are used. The result is better, in two respects, than those of the previous analyses. First, it is shown that the expected number of steps is bounded between two quadratic functions <italic>c</italic><subscrpt>1</subscrpt>(min(<italic>m</italic>, <italic>n</italic>))<supscrpt>2</supscrpt> and <italic>c</italic>2(min(<italic>m</italic>, <italic>n</italic>))<supscrpt>2</supscrpt> of the <italic>smaller</italic> dimension of the problem. This should be compared with the previous two major results in the field. Borgwardt proves an upper bound of <italic>O</italic>(<italic>n</italic><supscrpt>4</supscrpt><italic>m</italic><supscrpt>1/(<italic>n</italic>-1)</supscrpt>) under a model that implies that the zero vector satisfies all the constraints, and also the algorithm under his consideration solves only problems from that particular subclass. Smale analyzes the self-dual algorithm starting at (1, … , 1)<supscrpt>T</supscrpt>. He shows that for any fixed <italic>m</italic> there is a constant <italic>c</italic>(<italic>m</italic>) such the expected number of steps is less than <italic>c</italic>(<italic>m</italic>)(ln <italic>n</italic>)<italic><supscrpt>m</italic>(<italic>m</italic>+1)</supscrpt>; Megiddo has shown that, under Smale's model, an upper bound <italic>C</italic>(<italic>m</italic>) exists. Thus, for the first time, a polynomial upper bound with no restrictions (except for nondegeneracy) on the problem is proved, and, for the first time, a nontrivial lower bound of precisely the same order of magnitude is established. Both Borgwardt and Smale require the input vectors to be drawn from spherically symmetric distributions. In the model in this paper, invariance is required only under certain

[1]  R. Buck Partition of Space , 1943 .

[2]  Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery , 1961, Nature.

[3]  George B. Dantzig,et al.  Linear programming and extensions , 1965 .

[4]  C. E. Lemke,et al.  Bimatrix Equilibrium Points and Mathematical Programming , 1965 .

[5]  V. Klee,et al.  HOW GOOD IS THE SIMPLEX ALGORITHM , 1970 .

[6]  Katta G. Murty,et al.  Computational complexity of parametric linear programming , 1980, Math. Program..

[7]  Ludo van der Heyden,et al.  A variable dimension algorithm for the linear complementarity problem , 1980, Math. Program..

[8]  Nesa L'abbe Wu,et al.  Linear programming and extensions , 1981 .

[9]  Sancho E. Berenguer,et al.  Random Linear Programs. , 1981 .

[10]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Random polytopes: Their definition, generation and aggregate properties , 1982, Math. Program..

[11]  Karl-Heinz Borgwardt,et al.  The Average number of pivot steps required by the Simplex-Method is polynomial , 1982, Z. Oper. Research.

[12]  Karl Heinz Borgwardt,et al.  Some Distribution-Independent Results About the Asymptotic Order of the Average Number of Pivot Steps of the Simplex Method , 1982, Math. Oper. Res..

[13]  Steve Smale,et al.  The Problem of the Average Speed of the Simplex Method , 1982, ISMP.

[14]  Stephen Smale,et al.  On the average number of steps of the simplex method of linear programming , 1983, Math. Program..

[15]  Nimrod Megiddo,et al.  On the expected number of linear complementarity cones intersected by random and semi-random rays , 1986, Math. Program..

[16]  Nimrod Megiddo,et al.  Improved asymptotic analysis of the average number of steps performed by the self-dual simplex algorithm , 1986, Math. Program..

[17]  Charles E. Blair,et al.  Random linear programs with many variables and few constraints , 1986, Math. Program..