ASTEROID: A New Clinical Stereotest on an Autostereo 3D Tablet

Purpose To describe a new stereotest in the form of a game on an autostereoscopic tablet computer designed to be suitable for use in the eye clinic and present data on its reliability and the distribution of stereo thresholds in adults. Methods Test stimuli were four dynamic random-dot stereograms, one of which contained a disparate target. Feedback was given after each trial presentation. A Bayesian adaptive staircase adjusted target disparity. Threshold was estimated from the mean of the posterior distribution after 20 responses. Viewing distance was monitored via a forehead sticker viewed by the tablet's front camera, and screen parallax was adjusted dynamically so as to achieve the desired retinal disparity. Results The tablet must be viewed at a distance of greater than ∼35 cm to produce a good depth percept. Log thresholds were roughly normally distributed with a mean of 1.75 log10 arcsec = 56 arcsec and SD of 0.34 log10 arcsec = a factor of 2.2. The standard deviation agrees with previous studies, but ASTEROID thresholds are approximately 1.5 times higher than a similar stereotest on stereoscopic 3D TV or on Randot Preschool stereotests. Pearson correlation between successive tests in same observer was 0.80. Bland-Altman 95% limits of reliability were ±0.64 log10 arcsec = a factor of 4.3, corresponding to an SD of 0.32 log10 arcsec on individual threshold estimates. This is similar to other stereotests and close to the statistical limit for 20 responses. Conclusions ASTEROID is reliable, easy, and portable and thus well-suited for clinical stereoacuity measurements. Translational Relevance New 3D digital technology means that research-quality psychophysical measurement of stereoacuity is now feasible in the clinic.

[1]  Kathleen Vancleef,et al.  Two choices good, four choices better: For measuring stereoacuity in children, a four-alternative forced-choice paradigm is more efficient than two , 2018, PloS one.

[2]  Graham Morgan,et al.  Analysis of Soft Data for Mass Provision of Stereoacuity Testing Through a Serious Game for Health , 2017, DH.

[3]  Jenny C. A. Read,et al.  Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis , 2017, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  Jenny C. A. Read,et al.  Avoiding monocular artifacts in clinical stereotests presented on column-interleaved digital stereoscopic displays , 2016, Journal of vision.

[5]  I. Serrano-Pedraza,et al.  Determination of the slope of the psychometric function for different stereoacuity tasks , 2016 .

[6]  Cindy X. Guo,et al.  A Robust and Reliable Test to Measure Stereopsis in the Clinic. , 2016, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza,et al.  The Stereoscopic Anisotropy Develops During Childhood , 2016, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Michael Dorr,et al.  Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[9]  Jeremy R. Cooperstock,et al.  Stereo Vision: The Haves and Have-Nots , 2015, i-Perception.

[10]  Patrick T. Goodbourn,et al.  A population study of binocular function , 2015, Vision Research.

[11]  B. Antona,et al.  Intraexaminer repeatability and agreement in stereoacuity measurements made in young adults. , 2015, International journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  Byoungho Lee,et al.  New Stereoacuity Test Using a 3-Dimensional Display System in Children , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  J. Read,et al.  Stereo vision and strabismus , 2015, Eye.

[14]  David Kane,et al.  The Limits of Human Stereopsis in Space and Time , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  H. Yang,et al.  Reliability and validity of an automated computerized visual acuity and stereoacuity test in children using an interactive video game. , 2013, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  Yi Shen,et al.  A maximum-likelihood procedure for estimating psychometric functions: thresholds, slopes, and lapses of attention. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Byoungho Lee,et al.  Distance stereotest using a 3-dimensional monitor for adult subjects. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  Robert S. Allison,et al.  The effect of crosstalk on depth magnitude in thin structures , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[19]  Robert S. Allison,et al.  The Effect of Crosstalk on the Perceived Depth From Disparity and Monocular Occlusions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[20]  J. Holmes,et al.  Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[21]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[22]  D. Mojon,et al.  A new 3D monitor-based random-dot stereotest for children. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  J. Sloper,et al.  Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[24]  C. Zaroff,et al.  Variation in stereoacuity: normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Stereoacuity Test: automatic measurement of stereo threshold , 2001, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[26]  H S Smallman,et al.  Spatial Scale Interactions in Stereo Sensitivity and the Neural Representation of Binocular Disparity , 1997, Perception.

[27]  G S Rubin,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans. The SEE Study. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  P. King-Smith,et al.  Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation , 1994, Vision Research.

[29]  D. M. Green,et al.  A maximum-likelihood method for estimating thresholds in a yes-no task. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  W. Cadera,et al.  Factors associated with binocular single vision in microtropia/monofixation syndrome. , 1991, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[31]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Color as a source of information in the stereo correspondence process , 1990, Vision Research.

[32]  D. M. Green,et al.  Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[34]  Tom Duff,et al.  Compositing digital images , 1984, SIGGRAPH.

[35]  S. McKee,et al.  What prior uniocular processing is necessary for stereopsis? , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choice , 1979 .

[37]  M. M. Taylor On the efficiency of psychophysical measurement. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  C. Blakemore The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[40]  J A SWETS,et al.  Is there a sensory threshold? , 1961, Science.

[41]  Rafael Navarro,et al.  The Optical Design of the Human Eye: a Critical Review , 2009 .

[42]  Whitman Richards,et al.  Stereopsis and stereoblindness , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  S Elliott,et al.  Interventions for infantile esotropia. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[44]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[45]  John Lee,et al.  Clinical tests for binocular vision , 1996, Eye.

[46]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST , 1982 .

[47]  H R BLACKWELL,et al.  Neural theories of simple visual discriminations. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[48]  J. Read,et al.  This Work Is Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Stereoacuity with Frisby and Revised Fd2 Stereo Tests , 2022 .