An Agent-Based Model of Social Identity Dynamics

According to optimal distinctiveness theory (ODT; Brewer 1991), individuals prefer social groups that are relatively distinct compared to other groups in the individuals' social environment. Distinctive groups (i.e., groups of moderate relative size) are deemed "optimal" because they allow for feelings of inclusion and social connection while simultaneously providing a basis for differentiating the self from others. However, ODT is a theory about individual preferences and, as such, does not address the important question of what types of groups are actually formed as a function of these individual-level preferences for groups of a certain size. The goal of the current project was to address this gap and provide insight into how the nature of the social environment (e.g., the size of the social neighborhood) interacts with individual-level group size preferences to shape group formation. To do so, we developed an agent-based model in which agents adopted a social group based on an optimal group size preference (e.g., a group whose size represented 20% of the social neighborhood). We show that the assumptions of optimal distinctiveness theory do not lead to individually satisfactory outcomes when all individuals share the same social environment. We were able to produce results similar to those predicted by ODT when social neighborhoods were local and overlapping. These results suggest that the effectiveness of a social identity decision strategy is highly dependent on sociospatial structure.

[1]  Luke Rendell,et al.  ROGERS’ PARADOX RECAST AND RESOLVED: POPULATION STRUCTURE AND THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL LEARNING STRATEGIES , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  B A Huberman,et al.  Evolutionary games and computer simulations. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  D. Abrams Political distinctiveness: An identity optimising approach , 1994 .

[4]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Contextualizing person perception: distributed social cognition. , 2009, Psychological review.

[5]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction , 2011 .

[6]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social Network Sensors for Early Detection of Contagious Outbreaks , 2010, PloS one.

[7]  T. L. Schwartz The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[8]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling: A New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[9]  Vicenç Quera,et al.  Spatial Behavior in Groups: an Agent-Based Approach , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[10]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[11]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[12]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Identity needs versus social opportunities : The use of group-level and individual-level identity management strategies , 1997 .

[13]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Population Heterogeneity and Individual Differences in an Assortative Agent-Based Marriage and Divorce Model (MADAM) Using Search with Relaxing Expectations , 2008, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[14]  M. Brewer,et al.  Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Jonathan E. Butner,et al.  Dynamical evolutionary psychology: individual decision rules and emergent social norms. , 2003, Psychological review.

[16]  Sean Luke,et al.  MASON : A Multi-Agent Simulation Environment , 2008 .

[17]  H. Hotelling Stability in Competition , 1929 .

[18]  Victor DeMiguel,et al.  Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? , 2009 .

[19]  Jeffrey C. Schank,et al.  Human mate choice is a complex system , 2012, Complex..

[20]  T. Schelling Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[21]  P. Richerson,et al.  The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  J. Koella,et al.  The spatial spread of altruism versus the evolutionary response of egoists , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[24]  P. Smaldino,et al.  Agent-based modeling as a tool for studying social identity processes: The case of optimal distinctiveness theory , 2011 .

[25]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[26]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Coupled Contagion Dynamics of Fear and Disease: Mathematical and Computational Explorations , 2007, PloS one.

[27]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Coevolutionary Games - A Mini Review , 2009, Biosyst..

[28]  Scott L. Feld,et al.  Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations , 1997 .

[29]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Taking the Social Origins of Human Nature Seriously: Toward a More Imperialist Social Psychology , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[30]  D. Helbing,et al.  The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  S. Otten,et al.  Positive–negative asymmetry in social discrimination: The impact of stimulus valence and size and status differentials on intergroup evaluations , 1995 .

[32]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Computational Modelling of Trust and Social Relationships , 2012, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[33]  B. Simon,et al.  Self-stereotyping and social context: the effects of relative in-group size and in-group status. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  G. Gigerenzer Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty , 2008 .

[35]  N. Christakis,et al.  Alone in the Crowd: The Structure and Spread of Loneliness in a Large Social Network , 2009 .

[36]  John H. Miller,et al.  Complex adaptive systems - an introduction to computational models of social life , 2009, Princeton studies in complexity.

[37]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics , 1992 .

[38]  Ryan Muldoon,et al.  Segregation That No One Seeks* , 2012, Philosophy of Science.

[39]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[40]  Geoffrey J. Leonardelli,et al.  Minority and Majority Discrimination: When and Why ☆ , 2001 .

[41]  Jeffrey C Schank,et al.  Movement patterns, social dynamics, and the evolution of cooperation. , 2012, Theoretical population biology.

[42]  John C. Turner,et al.  Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context , 1994 .

[43]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Uncertainty–Identity Theory , 2007 .

[44]  Peng Wang,et al.  Exponential random graph models for affiliation networks , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[45]  Bernd Simon,et al.  Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. , 1987 .