Anterior-Posterior versus anterior-lateral electrodes position for electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

[1]  S. Vallurupalli,et al.  Meta-Analysis Comparing Anterior-Lateral Versus Anterior-Posterior Electrode Position for Biphasic Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation. , 2022, American Journal of Cardiology.

[2]  B. Løfgren,et al.  Anterior–Lateral Versus Anterior–Posterior Electrode Position for Cardioverting Atrial Fibrillation , 2021, Circulation.

[3]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  A. Walkey,et al.  Atrial Fibrillation in the ICU. , 2018, Chest.

[5]  I. Stiell,et al.  The efficacy of pad placement for electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation/flutter: a systematic review. , 2014, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  Aibin Tao,et al.  Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode position for external electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2014, Archives of cardiovascular diseases.

[7]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  I. Vogiatzis,et al.  External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: the role of electrode position on cardioversion success. , 2009, International journal of cardiology.

[9]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[10]  G. Lip,et al.  Management of atrial fibrillation , 2007, The Lancet.

[11]  S. Walsh,et al.  Impedance compensated biphasic waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a multi-centre comparison of antero-apical and antero-posterior pad positions. , 2005, European heart journal.

[12]  M. Böhm,et al.  Randomized comparison of anterolateral versus anteroposterior electrode position for biphasic external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. , 2005, American heart journal.

[13]  S. Walsh,et al.  Theory and practice of defibrillation: (1) Atrial fibrillation and DC conversion , 2004, Heart.

[14]  Chien‐Jen Chen,et al.  External cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a reappraisal of the effects of electrode pad position and transthoracic impedance on cardioversion success. , 2003, Japanese heart journal.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode positions for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[17]  N. Alp,et al.  Randomised comparison of antero-lateral versus antero-posterior paddle positions for DC cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. , 2000, International journal of cardiology.

[18]  G. Botto,et al.  External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: role of paddle position on technical efficacy and energy requirements , 1999, Heart.

[19]  N P Campbell,et al.  Randomised comparison of electrode positions for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation , 1999, Heart.

[20]  B B Lerman,et al.  Relation between transcardiac and transthoracic current during defibrillation in humans. , 1990, Circulation research.