Measuring smoking-related preoccupation and compulsive drive: evaluation of the obsessive compulsive smoking scale

Recent advances in medical X-ray imaging have enabled the development of new techniques capable of assessing not only bone quantity but also structure. This article provides (a) a brief review of the current X-ray methods used for quantitative assessment of the skeleton, (b) data on the levels of radiation exposure associated with these methods and (c) information about radiation safety issues. Radiation doses associated with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry are very low. However, as with any X-ray imaging technique, each particular examination must always be clinically justified. When an examination is justified, the emphasis must be on dose optimisation of imaging protocols. Dose optimisation is more important for paediatric examinations because children are more vulnerable to radiation than adults. Methods based on multi-detector CT (MDCT) are associated with higher radiation doses. New 3D volumetric hip and spine quantitative computed tomography (QCT) techniques and high-resolution MDCT for evaluation of bone structure deliver doses to patients from 1 to 3 mSv. Low-dose protocols are needed to reduce radiation exposure from these methods and minimise associated health risks.

[1]  D. Sartoris,et al.  Optimized interpretation and reporting of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[3]  J. Valentin,et al.  Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[4]  M. Dobritz,et al.  Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[5]  Mark Helfand,et al.  Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  G. Brix,et al.  Dose reduction by automatic exposure control in multidetector computed tomography: comparison between measurement and calculation , 2009, European Radiology.

[7]  John Damilakis,et al.  Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality. , 2008, Medical physics.

[8]  Division on Earth Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[9]  Christian Graeff,et al.  Monitoring Teriparatide‐Associated Changes in Vertebral Microstructure by High‐Resolution CT In Vivo: Results From the EUROFORS Study , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  Jack Valentin,et al.  Pregnancy and medical radiation. , 2000, Annals of the ICRP.

[11]  C. Roux,et al.  Méthodes radiographiques d’évaluation des fractures vertébrales ostéoporotiques ☆ , 2009 .

[12]  Patient doses in bone mineral densitometry. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  Gabriele Armbrecht,et al.  Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions. , 2008, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[14]  Hajime Orimo,et al.  Multi‐Detector Row CT Imaging of Vertebral Microstructure for Evaluation of Fracture Risk , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  D. Green,et al.  Cross-calibration, precision and patient dose measurements in preparation for clinical trials using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  Adrian K. Dixon,et al.  Benefits and costs, an eternal balance , 2007 .

[17]  Absorbed dose measurements in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  T. M. Link,et al.  Vertebral morphometry: current methods and recent advances , 2008, European Radiology.

[19]  C. Njeh,et al.  Radiological assessment of a new bone densitometer--the Lunar EXPERT. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[20]  C. Graeff,et al.  Quantitative computed tomographic assessment of the effects of 24 months of teriparatide treatment on 3D femoral neck bone distribution, geometry, and bone strength: Results from the EUROFORS study , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[21]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Embryo/Fetus Radiation Dose and Risk from Dual X-ray Absorptiometry Examinations , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  C. Roux,et al.  Radiographic methods for evaluating osteoporotic vertebral fractures. , 2009, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[23]  C. Cann,et al.  Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[24]  M. Nevitt,et al.  Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  H. McKay,et al.  High-resolution peripheral QCT imaging of bone micro-structure in adolescents , 2010, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  J R Saunderson,et al.  An assessment of the radiation dose to patients and staff from a Lunar Expert-XL fan beam densitometer , 1998, Physiological measurement.

[27]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT. , 2009, Medical physics.

[28]  G. Blake,et al.  Comparison of effective dose to children and adults from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations. , 2006, Bone.

[29]  G. Blake,et al.  Patient dose in dual x-ray absorptiometry , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[30]  G. Blake,et al.  Occupational dose to the radiographer in dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison of pencil-beam and fan-beam systems. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[31]  N. Sheahan,et al.  QA/acceptance testing of DEXA X-ray systems used in bone mineral densitometry. , 2008, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[32]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT. , 2009, Radiology.

[33]  P. Delmas,et al.  Early impairment of trabecular microarchitecture assessed with HR‐pQCT in patients with stage II‐IV chronic kidney disease , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[34]  D. Levin,et al.  Changes in procedure volume and service provider distribution among radiologists and nonradiologists in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry between 1996 and 2002. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[35]  The DXL Calscan heel densitometer: evaluation and diagnostic thresholds. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[36]  K. Engelke,et al.  High resolution computed tomography of the vertebrae yields accurate information on trabecular distances if processed by 3D fuzzy segmentation approaches. , 2009, Bone.

[37]  Dale L Preston,et al.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[38]  W. Kalender,et al.  Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography , 1992, Osteoporosis International.

[39]  D. Drinkwater,et al.  Regional and total body bone mineral content, bone mineral density, and total body tissue composition in children 8–16 years of age , 1993, Calcified Tissue International.

[40]  L. Carbone,et al.  Longitudinal Trends in Use of Bone Mass Measurement Among Older Americans, 1999–2005 , 2008, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[41]  C. Njeh,et al.  Radiation dose and in vitro precision in paediatric bone mineral density measurement using dual X-ray absorptiometry. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[42]  L. Ferrar,et al.  Vertebral fracture assessment: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions. , 2006, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[43]  S. Gehlbach,et al.  Recognition of Vertebral Fracture in a Clinical Setting , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[44]  D A Pierce,et al.  Radiation-Related Cancer Risks at Low Doses among Atomic Bomb Survivors , 2000, Radiation research.

[45]  S. Papapoulos,et al.  Report on Osteoporosis in the European Community: Current Status and Recommendations for the Future , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[46]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[47]  F. Palmieri,et al.  Assessment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using specialized workflow software for 6-point morphometry. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[48]  H. Genant,et al.  Evaluation of vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter setting , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[49]  J. Valentin,et al.  Don't step on it , 2000, Annals of the ICRP.

[50]  R. Eastell,et al.  Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[51]  J. Damilakis,et al.  The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations. , 2005, Medical physics.

[52]  J. Damilakis,et al.  The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations. , 2005, Medical physics.

[53]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT. , 2008, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[54]  G. Blake,et al.  Vertebral morphometry studies using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. , 1997, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[55]  D. L. Preston,et al.  Solid Cancer Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–1998 , 2007, Radiation research.

[56]  H. Genant,et al.  Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment. , 1999, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[57]  J. Adams,et al.  Identification of vertebral fractures: An update , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[58]  Klaus Engelke,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). , 2009, Bone.

[59]  W. Huda,et al.  Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. , 2008, Radiology.

[60]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Title Assessment of trabecular bone structure using MDCT : comparison of 64-and 320-slice CT using HR-pQCT as the reference standard Permalink , 2010 .