The concept of “ba”: A new path in the study of knowledge in firms

– In this article we present a relatively novel concept: the “ba”. This concept was put forward by two authors, Nonaka and Konno (1998), who showed that the “ba” – a form of interaction “place” – was a foundation for the creation of knowledge in an organisation. We believe that this space plays a decisive role in the study and description of knowledge management in firms and that it can be used in many fields of research. Because it is a multi-organisational, multipurpose, etc. concept, its contribution is significant. Our presentation of this concept will be based on the works of Nonaka and Konno (1998), but we will also examine the main themes arising from the theoretical movements dealing with knowledge in organisations. Moreover, we are also putting forward a framework of study related to this concept, and a definition of the main possible forms of “ba”. Classification Codes: L20, L21, L23, M11, M12, M13, M14.

[1]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Groupware and teamwork: invisible aid or technical hindrance? , 1997 .

[2]  Olivier Weinstein,et al.  Les nouvelles théories de l'entreprise , 1995 .

[3]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[4]  J. Habermas,et al.  Logique des sciences sociales et autres essais , 1987 .

[5]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues , 1996 .

[6]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[7]  E. Wenger,et al.  Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[8]  Patrick Cohendet,et al.  Communities of Practice and Epistemic Communities : A Renewed Approach of Organisational Learning within the Firm , .

[9]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[10]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[11]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[12]  P. Saviotti.  On the dynamics of appropriability, of tacit and of codified knowledge , 1998 .

[13]  Nathalie Lazaric,et al.  Mémoire organisationnelle et codification des connaissances , 1998 .

[14]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[15]  Rod Coombs,et al.  `Knowledge management practices' and path-dependency in innovation , 1998 .

[16]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[17]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[18]  P. Baumard.  Tacit Knowledge in Organizations , 1999 .

[19]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[20]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  Les institutions de l'économie , 1994 .

[21]  R. T. Beaty,et al.  The competitive challenge , 1993 .

[22]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Savoir pour agir : surmonter les obstacles à l'apprentissage organisationnel , 1995 .

[23]  Ludovic Dibiaggio.  Information, connaissance et organisation , 1998 .

[24]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A New View of Technological Change , 1969 .

[25]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[26]  D. Foray,et al.  The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 1997 .

[27]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[28]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[29]  Patrick Cohendet,et al.  La conception de la firme comme processeur de connaissances , 1999 .

[30]  F. Blackler.  Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .