The S2 subsites of cathepsins K and L and their contribution to collagen degradation

The exchange of residues 67 and 205 of the S2 pocket of human cysteine cathepsins K and L induces a permutation of their substrate specificity toward fluorogenic peptide substrates. While the cathepsin L‐like cathepsin K (Tyr67Leu/Leu205Ala) mutant has a marked preference for Phe, the Leu67Tyr/Ala205Leu cathepsin L variant shows an effective cathepsin K‐like preference for Leu and Pro. A similar turnaround of inhibition was observed by using specific inhibitors of cathepsin K [1‐(N‐Benzyloxycarbonyl‐leucyl)‐5‐(N‐Boc‐phenylalanyl‐leucyl)carbohydrazide] and cathepsin L [N‐(4‐biphenylacetyl)‐S‐methylcysteine‐(D)‐Arg‐Phe‐β‐phenethylamide]. Molecular modeling studies indicated that mutations alter the character of both S2 and S3 subsites, while docking calculations were consistent with kinetics data. The cathepsin K‐like cathepsin L was unable to mimic the collagen‐degrading activity of cathepsin K against collagens I and II, DQ‐collagens I and IV, and elastin‐Congo Red. In summary, double mutations of the S2 pocket of cathepsins K (Y67L/L205A) and L (L67Y/A205L) induce a switch of their enzymatic specificity toward small selective inhibitors and peptidyl substrates, confirming the key role of residues 67 and 205. However, mutations in the S2 subsite pocket of cathepsin L alone without engineering of binding sites to chondroitin sulfate are not sufficient to generate a cathepsin K‐like collagenase, emphasizing the pivotal role of the complex formation between glycosaminoglycans and cathepsin K for its unique collagenolytic activity.

[1]  J G Gleason,et al.  Design of potent and selective human cathepsin K inhibitors that span the active site. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. Kopeček,et al.  Inhibition of cathepsin K with lysosomotropic macromolecular inhibitors. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[3]  Enrico O. Purisima,et al.  A simple yet accurate boundary element method for continuum dielectric calculations , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  Imran Siddiqi,et al.  Solvated Interaction Energy (SIE) for Scoring Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities, 1. Exploring the Parameter Space , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[5]  F. Costa,et al.  A polymorphism in the angiogenesis inhibitor, endostatin, in multiple myeloma. , 2003, Leukemia research.

[6]  D. Brömme,et al.  Thiol-dependent cathepsins: pathophysiological implications and recent advances in inhibitor design. , 2002, Current pharmaceutical design.

[7]  A. Hollander,et al.  Molecular Interaction and Matrix Assembly , 1998, The Biochemical journal.

[8]  D. Turk,et al.  Lysosomal cysteine proteases: facts and opportunities , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[9]  H. Kawashima,et al.  Substrate specificity of recombinant osteoclast-specific cathepsin K from rabbits. , 1996, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[10]  M. Bogyo,et al.  Regulation of Collagenase Activities of Human Cathepsins by Glycosaminoglycans* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Enrico O. Purisima,et al.  Fast summation boundary element method for calculating solvation free energies of macromolecules , 1998 .

[12]  D. Brömme,et al.  Collagenolytic activity of cathepsin K is specifically modulated by cartilage-resident chondroitin sulfates. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[13]  B. Gelb,et al.  Collagenase Activity of Cathepsin K Depends on Complex Formation with Chondroitin Sulfate* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  J F Morrison,et al.  The kinetics of reversible tight-binding inhibition. , 1979, Methods in enzymology.

[15]  J. Whisstock,et al.  For the record: A single amino acid substitution affects substrate specificity in cysteine proteinases from Fasciola hepatica , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  E. Purisima,et al.  Design of noncovalent inhibitors of human cathepsin L. From the 96-residue proregion to optimized tripeptides. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  Enrico O. Purisima,et al.  Fast summation boundary element method for calculating solvation free energies of macromolecules , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  J. Deussing,et al.  Cathepsin L deficiency as molecular defect of furless: hyperproliferation of keratinocytes and pertubation of hair follicle cycling , 2000, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[19]  J. Richardson,et al.  Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  C. Craik,et al.  Selective inhibition of the collagenolytic activity of human cathepsin K by altering its S2 subsite specificity. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[21]  Matthew Bogyo,et al.  Cathepsin V, a Novel and Potent Elastolytic Activity Expressed in Activated Macrophages* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[23]  L. Juliano,et al.  A possible alternative mechanism of kinin generation in vivo by cathepsin L , 2005, Biological chemistry.

[24]  H. Chapman,et al.  Protease injury in the development of COPD: Thomas A. Neff Lecture. , 2000, Chest.

[25]  J. Palmer,et al.  Localization of Rat Cathepsin K in Osteoclasts and Resorption Pits: Inhibition of Bone Resorption and Cathepsin K-Activity by Peptidyl Vinyl Sulfones , 1999, Biological chemistry.

[26]  V. Herzog,et al.  Cathepsin K in thyroid epithelial cells: sequence, localization and possible function in extracellular proteolysis of thyroglobulin. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[27]  Jean-Daniel Zucker,et al.  Cathepsin S, a novel biomarker of adiposity: relevance to atherogenesis , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[28]  Francesco Leonetti,et al.  Substrate Profiling of Cysteine Proteases Using a Combinatorial Peptide Library Identifies Functionally Unique Specificities* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  D. Brömme,et al.  Human and parasitic papain-like cysteine proteases: their role in physiology and pathology and recent developments in inhibitor design. , 2002, Chemical reviews.

[30]  R. Ménard,et al.  Family C1 Cysteine Proteases: Biological Diversity or Redundancy? , 2003, Biological chemistry.

[31]  J. Morrison,et al.  [17] The kinetics of reversible tight-binding inhibition , 1979 .

[32]  D J Prockop,et al.  Collagens: molecular biology, diseases, and potentials for therapy. , 1995, Annual review of biochemistry.

[33]  P. Delmas,et al.  The Collagenolytic Activity of Cathepsin K Is Unique among Mammalian Proteinases* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  D. Brömme,et al.  Modulation of hypotensive effects of kinins by cathepsin K. , 2007, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[36]  A. Barrett,et al.  L-trans-Epoxysuccinyl-leucylamido(4-guanidino)butane (E-64) and its analogues as inhibitors of cysteine proteinases including cathepsins B, H and L. , 1982, The Biochemical journal.

[37]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Multiple Roles for Cysteine Cathepsins in Cancer , 2004, Cell cycle.

[38]  H. Chapman,et al.  Cathepsins and compartmentalization in antigen presentation. , 2000, Current opinion in immunology.

[39]  T. Welte,et al.  Pivotal role of cathepsin K in lung fibrosis. , 2004, The American journal of pathology.

[40]  A. Barrett,et al.  Inhibition of cysteine proteinases and dipeptidyl peptidase I by egg-white cystatin. , 1984, The Biochemical journal.

[41]  J. Palmer,et al.  Peptidyl vinyl sulphones: a new class of potent and selective cysteine protease inhibitors: S2P2 specificity of human cathepsin O2 in comparison with cathepsins S and L. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[42]  H. Chapman,et al.  Emerging roles for cysteine proteases in human biology. , 1997, Annual review of physiology.

[43]  M. Bogyo,et al.  Cathepsin L in secretory vesicles functions as a prohormone-processing enzyme for production of the enkephalin peptide neurotransmitter , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  P. Saftig,et al.  Cathepsin K: a cysteine protease with unique kinin-degrading properties. , 2004, The Biochemical journal.