ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION: 1978

With roots in social psychology, human relations, and organizational theory and behavior, the discipline of organizational communication has emerged in the last 25 years with its own content, methodology, and applications. Although one of the first major literature reviews of this field was produced about 15 years after much of the early foundation research had been completed (Guetzkow, 1965), the next major reviews were published in half the time (Porter & Roberts, 1972; Redding, 1972). As further evidence of the sheer quantity of research being completed in this new discipline, four additional reviews and syntheses were published during the next four years (Pietri et al., 1974; Goldhaber, 1975; Bernstein, 1976; Richetto, 1977). In fact, as Richetto closed his 1976 overview of the field, he predicted that there would “likely be continued attempts at integrating and synthesizing findings” (p. 336). Little did he realize that within two years, three additional reviews would appear (Dennis, Goldhaber, Yates, 1978; Farace, Taylor, Stewart, 1978; Monge, Edwards, Kirste, 1978). The present synthesis and review, with its emphasis on findings and implications, combines the results of recent North American and European research with those of the first 16 studies completed by the International Communication Association (1CA) Communication Audit. We have divided the review into three major sections: a historical overview of the major findings from both North America and Europe; major findings from the ICA Communication Audit; and implications of all major findings for future research.

[1]  INTERGROUP COMPARISONS OF INTRAPERSON DIFFERENCES: REWARDS FROM THE JOB , 1973 .

[2]  David G. Bowers,et al.  Management by Participation. , 1968 .

[3]  David G. Bowers,et al.  Organizational theory and human resource accounting. , 1969 .

[4]  F. Herzberg,et al.  The motivation to work , 1960 .

[5]  George S. Odiorne An Application of the Communications Audit , 1954 .

[6]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[7]  Richard V. Farace,et al.  Communication Network Integration and Group Uniformity in a Complex Organization. , 1974 .

[8]  R Pye,et al.  Office Location and the Cost of Maintaining Contact , 1977 .

[9]  D. Macdonald Communication Roles and Communication Content in a Bureaucratic Setting. , 1971 .

[10]  Jay W. Lorsch,et al.  Studies in Organization Design , 1970 .

[11]  Luther Gulick,et al.  Papers on the science of administration , 1938 .

[12]  Roger Pye,et al.  Effect of telecommunications on the location of office employment , 1976 .

[13]  H. Leavitt Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  Floyd C. Mann,et al.  Research in Functioning Organizations , 1951 .

[15]  William H. Read,et al.  Upward Communication in Industrial Hierarchies , 1962 .

[16]  Donald F. Schwartz Liaison Roles in the Communication Structure of a Formal Organization: A Pilot Study. , 1969 .

[17]  C. O'Reilly,et al.  Measuring organizational communication. , 1974 .

[18]  Stanley E. Seashore,et al.  Communication Practices in Complex Organizations , 1951, Journal of Social Issues.

[19]  C. Browne,et al.  Communication, supervision, and morale. , 1952 .

[20]  S. Seashore,et al.  Durability of organizational change. , 1970 .

[21]  J. Danowski An Information Processing Model of Organizations: A Focus on Environmental Uncertainty and Communication Network Structuring. , 1974 .

[22]  B Thorngren,et al.  How Do Contact Systems Affect Regional Development? , 1970 .

[23]  G. Goldhaber,et al.  The Ica Communication Audit: Process, Status, Critique , 1977 .

[24]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  The Determinants of Communication and Communication Structure in Large Organizations: A Review of Research , 1978 .

[25]  F. Tyler Shaping of the science. , 1970 .

[26]  G. Goldhaber ICA Communication Audit Survey Instrument: 1977 Organizational Norms. , 1977 .

[27]  L. Porter,et al.  Organizational Theory and Organizational Communication: A Communication Failure? , 1974 .

[28]  I D Trail,et al.  Communication—Within the Organization , 1967, American Association of Industrial Nurses journal.

[29]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Directions of Activity and Communication in a Departmental Executive Group , 1954 .

[30]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[31]  J. L. Price Handbook of Organizational Measurement , 1975 .

[32]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[33]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[34]  Michael D. Scott,et al.  Measuring Communication Apprehension. , 1978 .

[35]  C. Cooper,et al.  Relationships Between Managers and Their Work Associates , 1969 .

[36]  Stanley Schachter,et al.  Briefer Studies and Annotations , 1950 .

[37]  J. French,et al.  Overcoming Resistance to Change , 1948 .

[38]  Raymond L. Falcione,et al.  The Factor Structure of Source Credibility Scales for Immediate Superiors in the Organizational Context. , 1974 .

[39]  D. Conrath Communications Environment and its Relationship to Organizational Structure , 1973 .

[40]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  A STUDY OF THE GRAPEVINE IN A GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION , 1968 .

[41]  John R. Hinrichs,et al.  COMMUNICATIONS ACTIVITY OF INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH PERSONNEL , 1964 .

[42]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[43]  Donald P. Schwab,et al.  Theories of Performance and Satisfaction: A Review , 1970 .

[44]  William D. Richards A Manual for Network Analysis (Using the NEGOPY Network Analysis Program). , 1975 .

[45]  L. Porter,et al.  Communication in Organizations. , 1972 .

[46]  C. O'Reilly,et al.  Task group structure, communication, and effectiveness in three organizations. , 1977 .

[47]  SUPERIOR-SUBORDINATE COMMUNICATION: THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGERS WHO HELD THEIR SUBORDINATES' POSITIONS1 , 1963 .

[48]  John A. Daly,et al.  Occupational Desirability and Choice as a Function of Communication Apprehension , 1975 .