The Golden Rule as a Paradigm for Fostering Prosocial Behavior With Virtual Reality

The Golden Rule of ethics in its negative form states that you should not do to others what you would not want others to do to you, and in its positive form states that you should do to others as you would want them to do to you. The Golden Rule is an ethical principle, but in virtual reality (VR), it can also be thought of as a paradigm for the promotion of prosocial behavior. This is because in VR, you can directly experience harm that you inflicted or were complicit in inflicting from the embodied perspective of the victim. This use of what we refer to as the Golden Rule Embodiment Paradigm (GREP) relies on participants in VR having the illusion of body ownership over a virtual body. In this article, we introduce virtual embodiment and the consequent illusion of ownership over the virtual body, and describe how this phenomenon has been utilized to influence implicit attitudes. We then introduce the GREP and give examples of studies in which it enhanced helping behavior.

[1]  M. Slater,et al.  Virtual body ownership and its consequences for implicit racial bias are dependent on social context , 2020, Royal Society Open Science.

[2]  Alejandro Beacco,et al.  An Embodied Perspective as a Victim of Sexual Harassment in Virtual Reality Reduces Action Conformity in a Later Milgram Obedience Scenario , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Lisa Nakamura.  Feeling good about feeling bad: virtuous virtual reality and the automation of racial empathy , 2020 .

[4]  K. Cater,et al.  Behind the Curtain of the "Ultimate Empathy Machine": On the Composition of Virtual Reality Nonfiction Experiences , 2019, CHI.

[5]  Neil Burgess,et al.  A mechanistic account of bodily resonance and implicit bias , 2019, Cognition.

[6]  Dalila Szostak,et al.  A Virtual Reality Embodiment Technique to Enhance Helping Behavior of Police Toward a Victim of Police Racial Aggression , 2019, PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality.

[7]  Mar Gonzalez-Franco,et al.  Participant concerns for the Learner in a Virtual Reality replication of the Milgram obedience study , 2018, PloS one.

[8]  S. Shackford.  Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. , 2018, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[9]  Mel Slater,et al.  Virtually Being Einstein Results in an Improvement in Cognitive Task Performance and a Decrease in Age Bias , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[10]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Why and how to use virtual reality to study human social interaction: The challenges of exploring a new research landscape , 2018, British journal of psychology.

[11]  Jaron Lanier,et al.  Dawn of the New Everything: A Journey Through Virtual Reality , 2017 .

[12]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts , 2017, ACM Comput. Surv..

[13]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Virtual race transformation reverses racial in-group bias , 2017, PloS one.

[14]  Mel Slater,et al.  Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality , 2016, Front. Robot. AI.

[15]  Mel Slater,et al.  Virtual Embodiment of White People in a Black Virtual Body Leads to a Sustained Reduction in Their Implicit Racial Bias , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Behavioral, Neural, and Computational Principles of Bodily Self-Consciousness , 2015, Neuron.

[17]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Mel Slater,et al.  Body ownership causes illusory self-attribution of speaking and influences subsequent real speaking , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Tabitha C. Peck,et al.  Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[20]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias , 2013, Cognition.

[21]  M. Slater,et al.  Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  F. Vignemont.  Embodiment, ownership and disownership , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[23]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  First Person Experience of Body Transfer in Virtual Reality , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  Mel Slater,et al.  Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  V. Groom,et al.  The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias in immersive virtual environments , 2009 .

[26]  Justin M. Harris,et al.  If I Were You: Perceptual Illusion of Body Swapping , 2008, PloS one.

[27]  E. Staub,et al.  Altruism born of suffering: the roots of caring and helping after victimization and other trauma. , 2008, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[28]  G. Clore,et al.  On the interdependence of cognition and emotion , 2007, Cognition & emotion.

[29]  Jouni Reinikainen.  The Golden Rule and the Requirement of Universalizability , 2005 .

[30]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  TARGET ARTICLE: Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[32]  S. Gallagher.  Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[36]  S. Milgram.  Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View , 1975 .

[37]  Introduction.  The Golden Rule , 1902, Edinburgh Medical Journal.

[38]  Ethan Kross,et al.  Self-Distancing: Theory, Research, and Current Directions , 2017 .

[39]  Alexandru Dancu,et al.  The Ultimate Display , 2014 .

[40]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Transformed Representation 1 RUNNING HEAD: TRANSFORMED REPRESENTATION The Proteus Effect: Implications of Transformed Digital Self-Representation on Online and Offline Behavior , 2008 .