Evaluating the fitness for use of spatial data sets to promote quality in ecological assessment and monitoring

This article proposes and illustrates a practical methodological framework to evaluate the fitness for use of spatial data sets for environmental and ecological applications, focusing on user requirements for specified application contexts. The methodology is based on the use of metadata to analyze similarity between the data characteristics and the user’s needs or expectations for several quality indicators. Additionally, the concept of ‘critical factors’ is introduced in this framework, allowing users to define which quality indicators have greater importance given their own requirements or expectations and the specified application contexts. The proposed methodology further allows integrating and interconnecting the spatial data quality (SDQ) evaluation methodology with metadata geoportals in WebGIS platforms, facilitating its operation by users from non-spatial disciplines and with often limited expertise on this subject. Examples of the evaluation of fitness for use for specific application contexts within the project BIO_SOS (‘Biodiversity Multi-SOurce Monitoring System: From Space To Species’ FP7 project) are presented. By providing a prompt and straightforward evaluation tool, the proposed methodology can encourage the implementation of SDQ evaluation routines in ecological assessment and monitoring programs, promoting a more adequate use of geospatial data and ultimately contributing to well-supported policy and management decisions.

[1]  Williams,et al.  A cohesive approach towards quality assessment of spatial data , 2010 .

[2]  Robert Jeansoulin,et al.  Spatial Data Quality: Concepts , 2010 .

[3]  Yvan Bédard,et al.  Data Quality Issues and Geographic Knowledge Discovery , 2009 .

[4]  Mo Zhou,et al.  Mapping forest dynamics under climate change: A matrix model , 2011 .

[5]  G. Hunter,et al.  A Risk-Based Approach to Assessing the ‘ Fitness for Use ’ of Spatial Data , 1999 .

[6]  Robert Jeansoulin,et al.  Fundamentals of Spatial Data Quality , 2006 .

[7]  James D. Brown,et al.  The Data Uncertainty Engine (DUE): A software tool for assessing and simulating uncertain environmental variables , 2007, Comput. Geosci..

[8]  Andreas Richter,et al.  From Geoportals to Geographic Knowledge Portals , 2013, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[9]  Nicholas Chrisman,et al.  Part 2: Issues and Problems Relating to Cartographic Data Use, Exchange and Transfer: The Role Of Quality Information In The Long-Term Functioning Of A Geographic Information System , 1984 .

[10]  Rui F. Fernandes,et al.  Will climate change drive alien invasive plants into areas of high protection value? An improved model-based regional assessment to prioritise the management of invasions. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Robert Jeansoulin,et al.  Towards spatial data quality information analysis tools for experts assessing the fitness for use of spatial data , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Nigel Jollands,et al.  The usefulness of aggregate indicators in policy making and evaluation: a discussion with application to eco-efficiency indicators in New Zealand , 2003 .

[13]  Kristin Vanderbilt,et al.  Long term ecological research and information management , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[14]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Data Quality Issues and Geographic Knowledge Discovery , 2009 .

[15]  Eren Turak,et al.  Building a global observing system for biodiversity , 2012 .

[16]  Terry Parr,et al.  Detecting environmental change: science and society , 2003 .

[17]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Improving data quality through effective use of data semantics , 2006, Data Knowl. Eng..

[18]  Robert Jeansoulin,et al.  SPATIAL DATA QUALITY: FROM METADATA TO QUALITY INDICATORS AND CONTEXTUAL END-USER MANUAL , 2002 .

[19]  Sylvie Servigne,et al.  Quality Components, Standards, and Metadata , 2010 .

[20]  Esteban Zimányi,et al.  Advocacy for External Quality in GIS , 2011, GeoS.

[21]  Bernhard Seeger,et al.  The user's view on biodiversity data sharing - Investigating facts of acceptance and requirements to realize a sustainable use of research data - , 2012, Ecol. Informatics.

[22]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Procedure to Select the Best Dataset for a Task , 2004, GIScience.

[23]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[24]  P.A.J. van Oort,et al.  Spatial data quality: from description to application , 2006 .

[25]  Orland Hoeber,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Ranking for Personalized Geographic Information Retrieval , 2011, IHCI.

[26]  I. Ivánová,et al.  Searching for spatial data resources by fitness for use , 2011 .

[27]  John Rogan,et al.  Using GIS and remote sensing for ecological mapping and monitoring , 2007 .

[28]  Javier Nogueras-Iso,et al.  A Web Ontology Service to facilitate interoperability within a Spatial Data Infrastructure: Applicability to discovery , 2007, Data Knowl. Eng..

[29]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Distorted Views of Biodiversity: Spatial and Temporal Bias in Species Occurrence Data , 2010, PLoS biology.

[30]  F. V. D. Wel GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2011 .

[31]  R W Battarbee,et al.  Detecting environmental change: science and society-perspectives on long-term research and monitoring in the 21st century. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[32]  R. Devillers,et al.  Multidimensional Management of Geospatial Data Quality Information for its Dynamic Use Within GIS , 2005 .

[33]  J C Refsgaard,et al.  An integrated methodology for recording uncertainties about environmental data. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[34]  Tomi Kauppinen,et al.  An Ontology-driven Approach for Spatial Data Quality Evaluation , 2007 .

[35]  Arnold Bregt,et al.  Assessing fitness for use: the expected value of spatial data sets , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[36]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Thirty Years of Research on Spatial Data Quality: Achievements, Failures, and Opportunities , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[37]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  External Quality Evaluation of Geographical Applications: An Ontological Approach , 2010 .

[38]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[39]  Silvana Amaral,et al.  Spatial data availability and its implications for sustainable development of the Brazilian Amazon , 2009, Earth Sci. Informatics.

[40]  W. Cao,et al.  The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVIII-4/C7 CLASSIFICATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION OPTICAL AND SAR FUSION IMAGE USING FUZZY KNOWLEDGE AND OBJECT-ORIENTED PARADIGM , 2010 .

[41]  Hiromune Mitsuhashi,et al.  Abandonment and intensified use of agricultural land decrease habitats of rare herbs in semi-natural grasslands , 2010 .

[42]  David M. Mark,et al.  Ontological Foundations for Geographic Information Science , 2004 .

[43]  Robert Jeansoulin,et al.  ONTOLOGICAL APPROACH OF THE FITNESS OF USE OF GEOSPATIAL DATASETS , 2004 .