Teaching and Learning Confounding in the Health Sciences

In order to read or publish in the medical research literature, students in the health sciences need a thorough understanding of confounding. However, research shows that confounding may be poorly understood by some students even after two courses in biostatistics at the graduate level. We introduce two problem-based guided examples to increase both the breadth and depth of students’ understanding of this challenging subject. The first is a visual introduction to confounding and interaction in which students naturally lead the discussion through a set of increasingly complex models. The second example links the analysis to study design and compares results for a t test, a t test performed within the context of regression, and an adjusted analysis termed an “adjusted t test” to help link understanding. We also identify topics for improved teaching for such a challenging subject as confounding, with the goal of removing barriers to student understanding.

[1]  Don C Des Jarlais,et al.  Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[2]  Beth Chance,et al.  ASSESSING STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING AFTER A FIRST COURSE IN STATISTICS , 2007 .

[3]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[4]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[5]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[6]  N. Black CONSORT , 1996, The Lancet.

[7]  Evaluating Mastery of Biostatistics for Medical Researchers: Need for a New Assessment Tool , 2011, Clinical and translational science.

[8]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Diurnal Pattern to Insulin Secretion and Insulin Action in Healthy Individuals , 2012, Diabetes.

[9]  V. Novack,et al.  Evidence-based medicine: assessment of knowledge of basic epidemiological and research methods among medical doctors , 2006, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[10]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  H. Fineberg,et al.  When doctors meet numbers. , 1981, The American journal of medicine.