Abstract A simplified treatment of roughness effects in rolling-sliding elastohydrodynamic lubricated (EHL) contacts was developed by the author [4]. This analysis predicted that the original amplitude would be attenuated under the conjunction and that a decaying, complementary wave would be generated at the inlet. This complementary wave would be carried through the contact at the entrainment velocity and, for sinusoidal roughness, its wavelength would be given by λu/v, where λ is the wavelength of the original roughness, u the entrainment velocity, and v the velocity of the rough surface. This simplified analysis predicted the degree of attenuation of the original roughness and the decay rate of the complementary wave but did not determine the amplitude of the complementary wave. This paper presents a more detailed account of this analytical approach including compressibility effects together with a more accurate allowance for the coupling between the decay of the complementary wave and its wavelength. It also extends the work, using a perturbation analysis, determining accurate values for the pressures and clearance variations produced, under rolling-sliding conjunctions, by low-amplitude roughness. The perturbation results are compared with the predictions of the simplified analysis. It will be shown that the analysis is remarkably accurate. In addition, it appears to be relatively straightforward to determine the magnitude of the complementary wave for any given operating condition. The effect of low-amplitude, sinusoidal roughness on EHL contacts can then be expressed in terms of the operating conditions together with a single value for the amplitude of the complementary wave. This simplification suggests that it may be possible to produce a method for the rapid analysis of roughness effects in rolling-sliding conjunctions without the need for any detailed EHL calculations.
[1]
C. Venner.
Multilevel solution of the EHL line and point contact problems
,
1991
.
[2]
J A Greenwood,et al.
The Behaviour of Transverse Roughness in EHL Contacts
,
1994
.
[3]
Ward O. Winer,et al.
The Pressure-Viscosity Coefficient at Hertz Pressure And Its Relation To Concentrated Contact Traction
,
2000
.
[4]
C J Hooke,et al.
Rapid Calculation of the Pressures and Clearances in Rough, Elastohydrodynamically Lubricated Contacts Under Pure Rolling. Part 1: Low Amplitude, Sinusoidal Roughness
,
2006
.
[5]
Henry Peredur Evans,et al.
Fully Coupled Elastohydrodynamic Solution Techniques for the Analysis of Real Rough Line Contacts using Finite Element and Finite Difference Models
,
1997
.
[6]
C. Hooke.
The effect of roughness in EHL contacts
,
2005
.
[7]
J. A. Greenwood,et al.
The behaviour of transverse roughness in sliding elastohydrodynamically lubricated contacts
,
1992
.
[8]
C. Hooke,et al.
The behaviour of low-amplitude surface roughness under line contacts: Non-Newtonian fluids
,
2000
.
[9]
C. Venner,et al.
Surface roughness attenuation in line and point contacts
,
2000
.
[10]
H. Eyring.
Viscosity, Plasticity, and Diffusion as Examples of Absolute Reaction Rates
,
1936
.
[11]
C. Hooke,et al.
The behaviour of low-amplitude surface roughness under line contacts
,
1999
.