Multitudinous identities: a qualitative and network analysis of the 15M collective identity

The emergence of network-movements since 2011 has opened the debate around the way in which social media and networked practices make possible innovative forms of collective identity. We briefly review the literature on social movements and ‘collective identity’, and show the tension between different positions stressing either organization or culture, the personal or the collective, aggregative or networking logics. We argue that the 15M (indignados) network-movement in Spain demands conceptual and methodological innovations. Its rapid emergence, endurance, diversity, multifaceted development and adaptive capacity, posit numerous theoretical and methodological challenges. We show how the use of structural and dynamic analysis of interaction networks (in combination with qualitative data) is a valuable tool to track the shape and change of what we term the ‘systemic dimension’ of collective identities in network-movements. In particular, we introduce a novel method for synchrony detection in Facebook activity to identify the distributed, yet integrated, coordinated activity behind collective identities. Applying this analytical strategy to the 15M movement, we show how it displays a specific form of systemic collective identity we call ‘multitudinous identity’, characterized by social transversality and internal heterogeneity, as well as a transient and distributed leadership driven by action initiatives. Our approach attends to the role of distributed interaction and transient leadership at a mesoscale level of organizational dynamics, which may contribute to contemporary discussions of collective identity in network-movements.

[1]  Francesca Polletta,et al.  COLLECTIVE IDENTITY AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS , 2001 .

[2]  R. Stoecker.  Community, movement, organization : the problem of identity convergence in collective action , 1994 .

[3]  Eugenio Rodriguez,et al.  Studying Single-Trials of phase Synchronous Activity in the Brain , 2000, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[4]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[5]  J. Juris.  Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation , 2012 .

[6]  E. Laclau.  On Populist Reason , 2005 .

[7]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[8]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  K-core Organization of Complex Networks , 2005, Physical review letters.

[9]  P. Gerbaudo.  The persistence of collectivity in digital protest , 2014 .

[10]  K. Crawford,et al.  Big Data and Due Process: Toward a Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms , 2013 .

[11]  John Postill,et al.  Mobile ensembles: The uses of mobile phones for social protest by Spain’s indignados , 2014 .

[12]  Stephen B. Seidman,et al.  Network structure and minimum degree , 1983 .

[13]  Alberto Melucci,et al.  Challenging codes: The process of collective identity , 1996 .

[14]  J. Barlow,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2003 .

[15]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[16]  Cristina Flesher Fominaya,et al.  Collective Identity in Social Movements: Central Concepts and Debates , 2010 .

[17]  Stephen R. Barnard,et al.  Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age , 2012, New Media Soc..

[18]  Paolo Gerbaudo,et al.  In search of the ‘we’ of social media activism: introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities , 2015 .

[19]  A. Melucci.  Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age , 1997 .

[20]  Thomas Taaffe,et al.  Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire , 2006 .

[21]  S. Low,et al.  The "robust yet fragile" nature of the Internet. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Lambiotte,et al.  Random Walks, Markov Processes and the Multiscale Modular Organization of Complex Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering.

[23]  John Postill.  Localizing the Internet: An Anthropological Account , 2011 .

[24]  C. Mouffe,et al.  Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics , 1988 .

[25]  John Postill,et al.  Democracy in an age of viral reality: A media epidemiography of Spain’s indignados movement , 2014 .

[26]  Manuel Glez Bedia,et al.  Quantifying Political Self-Organization in Social Media. Fractal patterns in the Spanish 15M movement on Twitter , 2013, ECAL.

[27]  Karl J. Friston.  The labile brain. I. Neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[28]  P. Alstrøm,et al.  COMPLEXITY AND CRITICALITY , 2004 .

[29]  Íñigo Errejón Galván.  "Podemos" como práctica cultural emergente frente al imaginario neoliberal: hegemonía y disidencia. Conversación con Íñigo Errejón Galván , 2014 .

[30]  William A. Gamson,et al.  Commitment and agency in social movements , 1991 .

[31]  Allen Hunter,et al.  A discussion of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso, 1985). , 2016 .

[32]  Kevin McDonald,et al.  From Solidarity to Fluidarity: Social movements beyond 'collective identity'--the case of globalization conflicts , 2002 .

[33]  Embeddedness, Social Network Theory and Social Capital Theory: Antecedents and Consequence , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science.

[34]  W. Lance Bennett,et al.  Organization in the crowd: peer production in large-scale networked protests , 2014 .

[35]  H. Maibom.  Social Systems , 2007 .

[36]  D. R. White,et al.  Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups , 2003 .

[37]  F. Varela.  Resonant cell assemblies: a new approach to cognitive functions and neuronal synchrony. , 1995, Biological research.

[38]  Merlyna Lim,et al.  Framing Bouazizi: ‘White lies’, hybrid network, and collective/connective action in the 2010–11 Tunisian uprising , 2013 .

[39]  L. Brakel.  A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination , 2001 .

[40]  Karl-Dieter Opp,et al.  Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Critique, and Synthesis , 2009 .

[41]  Jose Candón-Mena.  Toma la calle, toma las redes: el movimiento #15M en Internet , 2013 .

[42]  G. Caruso,et al.  Networking Futures: The Movements Against Corporate Globalization , 2012 .

[43]  Michael McCluskey,et al.  The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics, by W. Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg , 2014 .

[44]  M. Castells.  ”Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age”. , 2019 .