Our purpose in this study was to characterize the performance of a recently introduced multi-slice CT scanner (LightSpeed QX/i, Version 1.0, General Electric Medical Systems) in comparison to a single-slice scanner from the same manufacturer (HiSpeed CT/i, Version 4.0). To facilitate this comparison, a refined definition of pitch is introduced which accommodates multi-slice CT systems, yet maintains the existing relationships between pitch, patient dose, and image quality. The following performance parameters were assessed: radiation and slice sensitivity profiles, low-contrast and limiting spatial resolution, image uniformity and noise, CT number and geometric accuracy, and dose. The multi-slice system was tested in axial (1, 2, or 4 images per gantry rotation) and HQ (Pitch = 0.75) and HS (Pitch = 1.5) helical modes. Axial and helical acquisition speed and limiting spatial resolution (0.8-s exposure) were improved on the multi-slice system. Slice sensitivity profiles, image noise, CT number accuracy and uniformity, and low-contrast resolution were similar. In some HS-helical modes, helical artifacts and geometric distortion were more pronounced with a different appearance. Radiation slice profiles and doses were larger on the multi-slice system at all scan widths. For a typical abdomen and pelvis exam, the central and surface body doses for 5-mm helical scans were higher on the multi-slice system by approximately 50%. The increase in surface CTDI values (with respect to the single-slice system) was greatest for the 4 x 1.25-mm detector configuration (190% for head, 240% for body) and least for the 4 x 5-mm configuration (53% for head, 76% for body). Preliminary testing of version 1.1 software demonstrated reduced doses on the multi-slice scanner, where the increase in body surface CTDI values (with respect to the single-slice system) was 105% for the 4 x 1.25-mm detector configuration and 10% for the 4 x 5-mm configuration. In summary, the axial and HQ-helical modes of the multi-slice system provided excellent image quality and a substantial reduction in exam time and tube loading, although at varying degrees of increased dose relative to the single-slice scanner.
[1]
J. Boone,et al.
A multiple detector array helical x-ray microtomography system for specimen imaging.
,
1999,
Medical physics.
[2]
H Hu,et al.
Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction.
,
1999,
Medical physics.
[3]
K. Taguchi,et al.
Algorithm for image reconstruction in multi-slice helical CT.
,
1998,
Medical physics.
[4]
N. Obuchowski,et al.
Determination of Spiral CT Slice Sensitivity Profiles Using a Point Response Phantom
,
1995,
Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[5]
C H McCollough,et al.
The measurement of radiation dose profiles for electron-beam computed tomography using film dosimetry.
,
1994,
Medical physics.
[6]
W A Kalender,et al.
Measurement of slice sensitivity profiles in spiral CT.
,
1994,
Medical physics.
[7]
G Wang,et al.
Helical CT image noise--analytical results.
,
1993,
Medical physics.
[8]
Raymond P. Rossi,et al.
Specification and Acceptance Testing of Computed Tomography Scanners
,
1993
.
[9]
W. Kalender,et al.
Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT.
,
1992,
Radiology.
[10]
K F King,et al.
Computed tomography scanning with simultaneous patient translation.
,
1990,
Medical physics.
[11]
Mitchell M. Goodsitt,et al.
Standardized Methods for Measuring Diagnostic X-Ray Exposures
,
1990
.
[12]
Thomas B. Shope,et al.
A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography.
,
1981
.
[13]
R A Jucius,et al.
Measurements of computed tomography x-ray fields utilizing the partial volume effect.
,
1980,
Medical physics.
[14]
A Suzuki,et al.
Use of a pencil-shaped ionization chamber for measurement of exposure resulting from a computed tomography scan.
,
1978,
Medical physics.
[15]
K E Ekstrand,et al.
A film dosimetry system for use in computed tomography.
,
1978,
Radiology.