Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system.

Our purpose in this study was to characterize the performance of a recently introduced multi-slice CT scanner (LightSpeed QX/i, Version 1.0, General Electric Medical Systems) in comparison to a single-slice scanner from the same manufacturer (HiSpeed CT/i, Version 4.0). To facilitate this comparison, a refined definition of pitch is introduced which accommodates multi-slice CT systems, yet maintains the existing relationships between pitch, patient dose, and image quality. The following performance parameters were assessed: radiation and slice sensitivity profiles, low-contrast and limiting spatial resolution, image uniformity and noise, CT number and geometric accuracy, and dose. The multi-slice system was tested in axial (1, 2, or 4 images per gantry rotation) and HQ (Pitch = 0.75) and HS (Pitch = 1.5) helical modes. Axial and helical acquisition speed and limiting spatial resolution (0.8-s exposure) were improved on the multi-slice system. Slice sensitivity profiles, image noise, CT number accuracy and uniformity, and low-contrast resolution were similar. In some HS-helical modes, helical artifacts and geometric distortion were more pronounced with a different appearance. Radiation slice profiles and doses were larger on the multi-slice system at all scan widths. For a typical abdomen and pelvis exam, the central and surface body doses for 5-mm helical scans were higher on the multi-slice system by approximately 50%. The increase in surface CTDI values (with respect to the single-slice system) was greatest for the 4 x 1.25-mm detector configuration (190% for head, 240% for body) and least for the 4 x 5-mm configuration (53% for head, 76% for body). Preliminary testing of version 1.1 software demonstrated reduced doses on the multi-slice scanner, where the increase in body surface CTDI values (with respect to the single-slice system) was 105% for the 4 x 1.25-mm detector configuration and 10% for the 4 x 5-mm configuration. In summary, the axial and HQ-helical modes of the multi-slice system provided excellent image quality and a substantial reduction in exam time and tube loading, although at varying degrees of increased dose relative to the single-slice scanner.

[1]  J. Boone,et al.  A multiple detector array helical x-ray microtomography system for specimen imaging. , 1999, Medical physics.

[2]  H Hu,et al.  Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. , 1999, Medical physics.

[3]  K. Taguchi,et al.  Algorithm for image reconstruction in multi-slice helical CT. , 1998, Medical physics.

[4]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Determination of Spiral CT Slice Sensitivity Profiles Using a Point Response Phantom , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  C H McCollough,et al.  The measurement of radiation dose profiles for electron-beam computed tomography using film dosimetry. , 1994, Medical physics.

[6]  W A Kalender,et al.  Measurement of slice sensitivity profiles in spiral CT. , 1994, Medical physics.

[7]  G Wang,et al.  Helical CT image noise--analytical results. , 1993, Medical physics.

[8]  Raymond P. Rossi,et al.  Specification and Acceptance Testing of Computed Tomography Scanners , 1993 .

[9]  W. Kalender,et al.  Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. , 1992, Radiology.

[10]  K F King,et al.  Computed tomography scanning with simultaneous patient translation. , 1990, Medical physics.

[11]  Mitchell M. Goodsitt,et al.  Standardized Methods for Measuring Diagnostic X-Ray Exposures , 1990 .

[12]  Thomas B. Shope,et al.  A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. , 1981 .

[13]  R A Jucius,et al.  Measurements of computed tomography x-ray fields utilizing the partial volume effect. , 1980, Medical physics.

[14]  A Suzuki,et al.  Use of a pencil-shaped ionization chamber for measurement of exposure resulting from a computed tomography scan. , 1978, Medical physics.

[15]  K E Ekstrand,et al.  A film dosimetry system for use in computed tomography. , 1978, Radiology.