Effect of Fellow Involvement and Experience on Patient Outcomes in Spine Surgery

Introduction: Investigations in spine surgery have demonstrated that trainee involvement correlates with increased surgical time, readmissions, and revision surgeries; however, the specific effects of spine fellow involvement remain unelucidated. This study aims to investigate the isolated effect of fellow involvement on surgical timing and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) after spine surgery and evaluate how surgical outcomes differ by fellow experience. Methods: All patients aged 18 years or older who underwent primary or revision decompression or fusion for degenerative diseases and/or spinal deformity between 2017 and 2019 at a single academic institution were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics, surgical factors, intraoperative timing, transfusion status, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, revision rate, and preoperative and postoperative PROMs were recorded. Surgeries were divided based on spine fellow participation status and occurrence in the start or end of fellowship training. Univariate and multivariate analyses compared outcomes across fellow involvement and fellow experience groups. Results: A total of 1,108 patients were included. Age, preoperative diagnoses, number of fusion levels, and surgical approach differed markedly by fellow involvement. Fellow training experience groups differed by patient smoking status, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach. On univariate analysis, spine fellow involvement was associated with extended total theater time, induction start to cut time, cut to close time, and LOS. Increased spine fellow training was associated with reduced cut to close time and LOS. On regression, fellow involvement predicted cut to close extension while increased fellow training experience predicted reduction in cut to close time, both independent of surgical factors and assisting residents or physician assistants. Transfusions, readmissions, revision rate, and PROMs did not differ markedly by fellow involvement or experience. Conclusion: Spine fellow participation predicted extended procedural duration. However, the presence of a spine fellow did not affect long-term postoperative outcomes. Furthermore, increased fellow training experience predicted decreased procedural time, underscoring a learning effect. Availability of Data and Material: The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Level of Evidence: Level 3

[1]  A. Vaccaro,et al.  How Does the Presence of a Surgical Trainee Impact Patient Outcomes in Lumbar Fusion Surgery? , 2021, International Journal of Spine Surgery.

[2]  A. Vaccaro,et al.  Are Patient Outcomes Affected by the Presence of a Fellow or Resident in Lumbar Decompression Surgery? , 2020, Spine.

[3]  Gyu Yeul Ji,et al.  Incidence, reasons, and risk factors for 30-day readmission after lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spinal disease , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[4]  A. Vaccaro,et al.  Fellow Versus Resident: Graduate Medical Education and Patient Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion Surgery. , 2020, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[5]  J. L. Marsh,et al.  Challenges to Orthopaedic Resident Education. , 2019, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[6]  A. Samdani,et al.  The Effect of the Level of Training of the First Assistant on the Outcomes of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery , 2019, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  C. Devin,et al.  Effect of Resident and Fellow Involvement in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[8]  Carl B Paulino,et al.  Costs and complications of increased length of stay following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery , 2019, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[9]  Alan H. Daniels,et al.  Trends in the Orthopaedic Surgery Subspecialty Fellowship Match: Assessment of 2010 to 2017 Applicant and Program Data , 2018, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  J. Grauer,et al.  Longer Operative Time Is Associated With Increased Adverse Events After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: 15-Minute Intervals Matter. , 2018, Orthopedics.

[11]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  The Impact of Resident Involvement in Elective Posterior Cervical Fusion , 2018, Spine.

[12]  T. Peabody,et al.  Can We Agree on Expectations and Assessments of Graduating Residents?: 2016 AOA Critical Issues Symposium. , 2017, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  Jun S. Kim,et al.  Impact of Operation Time on 30-Day Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery , 2017, Global spine journal.

[14]  Jun S. Kim,et al.  Anesthesia Duration as an Independent Risk Factor for Early Postoperative Complications in Adults Undergoing Elective ACDF , 2017, Global spine journal.

[15]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  Impact of Resident Involvement on Morbidity in Adult Patients Undergoing Fusion for Spinal Deformity , 2016, Spine.

[16]  S. Kakar,et al.  Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior cervical spine surgery: an analysis of 5,441 patients from the ACS NSQIP 2005-2012. , 2016, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[17]  N. Dahdaleh,et al.  Impact of Resident Participation on Outcomes After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of 3265 Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database , 2016, Spine.

[18]  J. Ha,et al.  Perioperative Surgical Complications and Learning Curve Associated with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Institute Experience , 2015, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[19]  Sakae Tanaka,et al.  Prospective multicenter surveillance and risk factor analysis of deep surgical site infection after posterior thoracic and/or lumbar spinal surgery in adults , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[20]  W. Yue,et al.  Learning Curve of a Complex Surgical Technique: Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS TLIF) , 2014, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[21]  W. Hsu,et al.  Impact of Resident Involvement on Orthopaedic Surgery Outcomes: An Analysis of 30,628 Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  D. Skaggs,et al.  Comparison of Outcomes After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic and Neuromuscular Scoliosis: Does the Surgical First Assistant's Level of Training Matter? , 2014, Spine.

[23]  J. Callaghan,et al.  The Effect of Resident Participation on Short-term Outcomes After Orthopaedic Surgery , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  W. Hsu,et al.  Operative Duration as an Independent Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications in Single-Level Lumbar Fusion: An Analysis of 4588 Surgical Cases , 2014, Spine.

[25]  Joseph A. Sclafani,et al.  Complications Associated With the Initial Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  J. Bader,et al.  Patient factors, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics that increase mortality and complication risk after spinal arthrodesis: a prognostic study based on 5,887 patients. , 2013, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[27]  R. Karia,et al.  Effect of Spine Fellow Training on Operative Outcomes, Affirming Graduated Responsibility , 2013, Spine.

[28]  J. Bader,et al.  The impact of resident involvement on post-operative morbidity and mortality following orthopaedic procedures: a study of 43,343 cases , 2013, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[29]  R. Vaz,et al.  Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. , 2013, Neurosurgical focus.

[30]  Jae Chul Lee,et al.  Learning Curve and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Our Experience in 86 Consecutive Cases , 2012, Spine.

[31]  Jeffrey G Jarvik,et al.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. , 2010, JAMA.

[32]  J. Auerbach,et al.  Perioperative Outcomes and Complications Related to Teaching Residents and Fellows in Scoliosis Surgery , 2008, Spine.

[33]  Darrell A Campbell,et al.  Seasonal Variation in Surgical Outcomes as Measured by the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[34]  B. Lonner,et al.  The Learning Curve Associated With Thoracoscopic Spinal Instrumentation , 2005, Spine.

[35]  M. Wiese,et al.  The related outcome and complication rate in primary lumbar microscopic disc surgery depending on the surgeon's experience: comparative studies. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[36]  V. Polezhaev.  Effect of a , 1974 .