Fidelity of Administrative Data When Researching Down Syndrome

Objective:To compare the fidelity of administrative data with clinical data when researching Down syndrome (DS). Methods:From outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department administrative claims within our institution, we identified 252 patients aged 18–45 years with encounters coded for DS by the ICD9=758.0 from 2000 to 2008. We evaluated these cases for false-positive errors—cases in which DS was not actually present in clinical descriptions. Subsequently, we identified false-negative errors (cases in which DS was present without encounters coded as such) by examination of the medical records for all patients within our study frame who had one of several common DS comorbidities, including congenital heart disease, hypothyroidism, and atlantoaxial instability. Results:Among the 252 people with an administrative code for DS, 53 (21%) did not have DS documented in their medical record (false-positive error). While searching for false-negative errors, 29 additional patients were discovered with DS documented in the medical record who had not been previously identified. This led to a final cohort of 228 patients with DS. The presence of a billing code for DS had moderate sensitivity (87%) and positive predictive value (79%), but high specificity (99.9%). Discussion:Administrative claims misclassify a sizeable proportion of patients with DS. Judgments about quality of care on the basis of samples identified using administrative claims may not accurately reflect the experience of patients with the conditions in question. When using administrative databases to study the quality of care for patients with DS, diagnostic verification within the clinical record is advisable whenever possible.

[1]  K. Kupka,et al.  International classification of diseases: ninth revision. , 1978, WHO chronicle.

[2]  J. Jollis,et al.  A comparison of administrative versus clinical data: coronary artery bypass surgery as an example. Ischemic Heart Disease Patient Outcomes Research Team. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  H T Sorensen,et al.  A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Transition of care provided for adolescents with special health care needs. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Children with Disabilities and Committee on Adolescence. , 1996, Pediatrics.

[5]  N Wolff,et al.  Nonsampling measurement error in administrative data: implications for economic evaluations. , 1996, Health economics.

[6]  Singer Rb.  Randomized trial of carvedilol in treatment of congestive heart failure. , 1997 .

[7]  R. B. Singer.  Randomized trial of carvedilol in treatment of congestive heart failure. , 1997, Journal of insurance medicine.

[8]  R. B. Singer,et al.  Comparative mortality in mentally retarded patients in California, with and without Down's syndrome, 1986-1991. , 1997, Journal of insurance medicine.

[9]  R. Lyons,et al.  Ten-year survival of Down syndrome births. , 1997, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  M. Bryon,et al.  Transition from Paediatric to Adult Care: Psychological Principles , 2001, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[11]  R. Hussain,et al.  The changing survival profile of people with Down's syndrome: implications for genetic counselling , 2002, Clinical genetics.

[12]  Patrick S Romano,et al.  Can Administrative Data Be Used to Compare Postoperative Complication Rates Across Hospitals? , 2002, Medical care.

[13]  J. Mccombs,et al.  Can Pharmacy Data Improve Prediction of Hospital Outcomes?: Comparisons With a Diagnosis-Based Comorbidity Measure , 2003, Medical care.

[14]  S. Jain,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Administrative Data in Health Information Systems , 2004, Medical care.

[15]  M. Mack,et al.  Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate? , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  H. Quan,et al.  Validity of Procedure Codes in International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification Administrative Data , 2004, Medical care.

[17]  W. Gilbert,et al.  Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  David A. Hanauer,et al.  EMERSE: The Electronic Medical Record Search Engine , 2006, AMIA.

[19]  JoAnn E Manson,et al.  Accuracy of Administrative Coding for Type 2 Diabetes in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults , 2007, Diabetes Care.

[20]  I. Lott,et al.  Alzheimer's disease in Down syndrome: neurobiology and risk. , 2007, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews.

[21]  Paul C Tang,et al.  Research Paper: Comparison of Methodologies for Calculating Quality Measures Based on Administrative Data versus Clinical Data from an Electronic Health Record System: Implications for Performance Measures , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  Comorbidity : The Ultimate Geriatric Syndrome Review Article Methodology , Design , and Analytic Techniques to Address Measurement of Comorbid Disease , 2007 .

[23]  Cynthia S Crowson,et al.  Potential misclassification of patients with psoriasis in electronic databases. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[24]  Jerzy Wegiel,et al.  Alzheimer's Disease in Adults with Down Syndrome. , 2008, International review of research in mental retardation.

[25]  David A Hanauer,et al.  Informatics and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: automated processes could replace manual record review. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[26]  R. Kirby,et al.  Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. , 2010, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[27]  R. Kirby,et al.  Twenty-five-year survival of children with birth defects in New York State: a population-based study. , 2011, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[28]  Stephen M. Anderson,et al.  The validity of using ICD-9 codes and pharmacy records to identify patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 2011, BMC health services research.

[29]  Samir S. Shah,et al.  Accuracy of Administrative Billing Codes to Detect Urinary Tract Infection Hospitalizations , 2011, Pediatrics.

[30]  R. Arceci,et al.  Natural history of transient myeloproliferative disorder clinically diagnosed in Down syndrome neonates: a report from the Children's Oncology Group Study A2971. , 2011, Blood.

[31]  J. Merrick,et al.  Morbidity and hospitalizations of adults with Down syndrome. , 2012, Research in developmental disabilities.

[32]  Ellen Balka,et al.  Caring for individual patients and beyond: Enhancing care through secondary use of data in a general practice setting , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[33]  A. Gustavsson,et al.  Socio‐economic burden of patients with a diagnosis related to chronic pain – Register data of 840,000 Swedish patients , 2012, European journal of pain.

[34]  Carl van Walraven,et al.  Administrative database research has unique characteristics that can risk biased results. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[35]  F. Fabris,et al.  Epidemiology of primary and secondary thrombocytopenia: first analysis of an administrative database in a major Italian institution , 2012, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[36]  A. Bottle,et al.  Impact of transfer for angioplasty and distance on AMI in-hospital mortality , 2012, Acute cardiac care.

[37]  Gayle Halas,et al.  Describing the content of primary care: limitations of Canadian billing data , 2012, BMC Family Practice.

[38]  K M Jensen,et al.  Primary care for adults with Down syndrome: adherence to preventive healthcare recommendations. , 2013, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.