Optimal Dynamic Contracting

We study a simple dynamic Principal-Agent model in which the agent?s types are serially correlated. In these models, the standard approach consists in first solving a relaxed version in which only local incentive compatibility constraints are considered, and then in proving that the local constraints are sufficient for implementability. We show that, with the exception of few notable examples highlighted in the literature, this approach is not generally valid: even assuming standard regularity conditions, both local and global incentive constraints are generally binding when serial correlation is sufficiently high. We uncover a number of interesting features of the optimal contract that cannot be observed in the special environments in which the standard approach works. Finally, we show that even in complex environments, approximately optimal allocations can be easily characterized by focusing on a particular class of contracts in which the allocation is forced to be monotonic.

[1]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[2]  D. P. Baron,et al.  Regulation and information in a continuing relationship , 1984 .

[3]  David Besanko Multi-period contracts between principal and agent with adverse selection , 1985 .

[4]  J. Laffont,et al.  Adverse Selection and Renegotiation in Procurement , 1990 .

[5]  J. Laffont,et al.  A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation , 1993 .

[6]  P. Courty,et al.  Sequential Screening , 1998 .

[7]  J. Laffont,et al.  The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model , 2001 .

[8]  Lars Stole Lectures on the Theory of Contracts and Organizations , 2001 .

[9]  M. Battaglini Long-Term Contracting with Markovian Consumers , 2005 .

[10]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Putting Auction Theory to Work , 2004 .

[11]  T. Mulgan The Contract Theory , 2006 .

[12]  Péter Eso,et al.  Optimal Information Disclosure in Auctions and the Handicap Auction , 2007 .

[13]  Ilya Segal,et al.  An Efficient Dynamic Mechanism , 2013 .

[14]  Marco Battaglini,et al.  Optimality and Renegotiation in Dynamic Contracting , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  D. Bergemann,et al.  The Dynamic Pivot Mechanism , 2008 .

[16]  Yuzhe Zhang,et al.  Dynamic Contracting with Persistent Shocks , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.

[17]  I. Segal,et al.  Dynamic Mechanism Design: Incentive Compatibility, Profit Maximization and Information Disclosure , 2009 .

[18]  Andrea Prat,et al.  Screening with an Approximate Type Space , 2010 .

[19]  Sylvain Chassang Calibrated Incentive Contracts , 2011 .

[20]  I. Werning,et al.  Insurance and Taxation Over the Life Cycle , 2011 .

[21]  Roland Strausz,et al.  The Benefits of Sequential Screening , 2011 .

[22]  M. Golosov,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Taxes , 2011 .

[23]  I. Segal,et al.  Dynamic Mechanism Design , 2022 .

[24]  Roman Inderst,et al.  How (not) to pay for advice: A framework for consumer financial protection ☆ , 2012 .

[25]  Rakesh V. Vohra,et al.  Dynamic mechanism design , 2012 .

[26]  Jason D. Hartline Approximation in mechanism design , 2010, BQGT.

[27]  Daniel F. Garrett,et al.  Managerial Turnover in a Changing World , 2010, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  M. Said,et al.  Progressive Screening: Long-Term Contracting with a Privately Known Stochastic Process , 2013 .

[29]  Marek Kapička,et al.  Efficient Allocations in Dynamic Private Information Economies with Persistent Shocks: A First-Order Approach , 2013 .