Assessment of the sustainability guidelines of EU Renewable Energy Directive: the case of biorefineries

Abstract Sustainability guidelines can help to safeguard the sustainable use of biological materials. When these guidelines are legally prescribed, their influence on the economic viability of bioenergy, biofuel and bioliquid projects is increased substantially, through their impact on national subsidy regimes and international trade. One of the key examples is the European directive 2009/28/EC, or the Renewable Energy Directive (RED), and the related COM/2010/11 that integrate guidelines for calculating greenhouse gas impact for various bioenergy pathways. This paper looks further into the sustainability results when influenced by principal decisions that are legally open for debate. Therefore, a concise review is conducted of the legal state-of-the-art on whether a product is waste or not. The review pinpoints uncertainty, leading to four potential legal scenarios. The sustainability of a complex biorefinery is analysed for each scenario. The results show (i) a high sensitivity to the principal decisions on the nature of waste materials in the scenarios, and (ii) to the definition of boundaries between the processes. More detailed rules for the application of the RED guidelines are needed, and should be complemented with methods specifically targeting all relevant sustainability aspects, thereby enhancing the overall understanding of the sustainability of the process.

[1]  M. Fatih Demirbas,et al.  Biorefineries for biofuel upgrading: A critical review , 2009 .

[2]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  Hydrogen for a sustainable global economy , 2010 .

[3]  E. Kaditi,et al.  Bio-energy policies in a global context , 2009 .

[4]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Agricultural crop-based biofuels – resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes , 2011 .

[5]  Pekka Leskinen,et al.  Current limits of life cycle assessment framework in evaluating environmental sustainability – case of two evolving biofuel technologies , 2013 .

[6]  Steven Van Passel,et al.  Advantages and limitations of exergy indicators to assess sustainability of bioenergy and biobased materials , 2014 .

[7]  Mireille Faist,et al.  Biofuel greenhouse gas calculations under the European Renewable Energy Directive - A comparison of the BioGrace tool vs. the tool of the Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels , 2013 .

[8]  Gunilla Clancy,et al.  Changing from petroleum to wood-based materials: critical review of how product sustainability characteristics can be assessed and compared , 2013 .

[9]  A. Nzihou,et al.  The fate of heavy metals during combustion and gasification of contaminated biomass-a brief review. , 2013, Journal of hazardous materials.

[10]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Biomass Digestion to Methane in Agriculture: A Successful Pathway for the Energy Production and Waste Treatment Worldwide , 2009 .

[11]  F. V. Stappen,et al.  Direct and indirect land use changes issues in European sustainability initiatives: State-of-the-art, open issues and future developments , 2011 .

[12]  Martin Dieterich,et al.  Biogas production potential from economically usable green waste. , 2012 .

[13]  J. Szargut.  Exergy Method: Technical and Ecological Applications , 2005 .

[14]  G. P. Hammond,et al.  Greenhouse gas reporting for biofuels: A comparison between the RED, RTFO and PAS2050 methodologies , 2011 .

[15]  Nicolae Scarlat,et al.  Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: A global overview , 2011 .

[16]  Nathalie Márquez,et al.  Development and techno‐economic evaluation of a biorefinery based on biomass (waste) streams – case study in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[17]  Sampo Soimakallio,et al.  How to ensure greenhouse gas emission reductions by increasing the use of biofuels?: Suitability of the European Union sustainability criteria , 2011 .

[18]  Joost G. Vogtländer,et al.  Allocation in recycling systems , 2001 .

[19]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[20]  Mikael Lantz,et al.  Environmental performance of biogas produced from industrial residues including competition with animal feed – life-cycle calculations according to different methodologies and standards , 2013 .

[21]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes , 1988 .

[22]  Ruben Guisson,et al.  Energy conversion park - a concept for the efficient use of regionally available biomass residue streams. , 2013, Waste management.

[23]  Paul T. Anastas,et al.  Frontiers in Green Chemistry: meeting the grand challenges for sustainability in R&D and manufacturing , 2008 .

[24]  Stijn Bruers,et al.  Exergy: its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Lindsay C. Stringer,et al.  European Union leadership in biofuels regulation: Europe as a normative power? , 2012 .

[26]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[27]  Jan Broeze,et al.  A techno-economic evaluation of a biomass energy conversion park , 2013 .

[28]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review , 2001 .

[29]  Joseph J. Bozell,et al.  Feedstocks for the Future : Biorefinery Production of Chemicals from Renewable Carbon , 2008 .

[30]  J Dewulf,et al.  Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  Supply chain and logistics issues of bio-energy production. , 2011 .