Dissociation of tone and vowel processing in Mandarin idioms.

Using event-related potentials, this study measured the access of suprasegmental (tone) and segmental (vowel) information in spoken word recognition with Mandarin idioms. Participants performed a delayed-response acceptability task, in which they judged the correctness of the last word of each idiom, which might deviate from the correct word in either tone or vowel. Results showed that, compared with the correct idioms, a larger early negativity appeared only for vowel violation. Additionally, a larger N400 effect was observed for vowel mismatch than tone mismatch. A control experiment revealed that these differences were not due to low-level physical differences across conditions; instead, they represented the greater constraining power of vowels than tones in the lexical selection and semantic integration of the spoken words. Furthermore, tone violation elicited a more robust late positive component than vowel violation, suggesting different reanalyses of the two types of information. In summary, the current results support a functional dissociation of tone and vowel processing in spoken word recognition.

[1]  N. Lavie,et al.  The role of working memory in attentional capture , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Jason Bohan,et al.  Anomalies at the Borderline of Awareness: An ERP Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Salmelin Clinical neurophysiology of language: The MEG approach , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Exceptions and anomalies: An ERP study on context sensitivity in autism , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  W. Marslen-Wilson Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[6]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Processing dependencies between segmental and suprasegmental features in Mandarin Chinese , 2008 .

[7]  Jeffrey G Malins,et al.  The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study , 2010 .

[8]  A. Friederici,et al.  Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[10]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech: semantic ERP effects , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Claudia K. Friedrich,et al.  Pitch modulates lexical identification in spoken word recognition: ERP and behavioral evidence. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  Chao-Yang Lee,et al.  Does Horse Activate Mother? Processing Lexical Tone in Form Priming , 2007, Language and speech.

[13]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Dissociable pitch processing mechanisms in lexical and melodic contexts revealed by ERPs , 2009, Brain Research.

[14]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Pitch accent and lexical tone processing in Chinese discourse comprehension: An ERP study , 2008, Brain Research.

[15]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. , 2006, Psychological review.

[16]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  A. Cutler Forbear is a Homophone: Lexical Prosody Does Not Constrain Lexical Access , 1986 .

[18]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[20]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  D. Yao,et al.  A method to standardize a reference of scalp EEG recordings to a point at infinity , 2001, Physiological measurement.

[22]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[23]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Contextual Influences during Spoken-Word Recognition: N200 Versus N400 Effects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  Word-Form Encoding in Mandarin Chinese as Assessed by the Implicit , 2002 .

[26]  E. Plante,et al.  Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Judging homophony in Chinese : the influence of tones , 1992 .

[29]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[30]  A. Samuel,et al.  The role of Mandarin lexical tones in lexical access under different contextual conditions , 2007 .

[31]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The neurocognition of syntactic processing , 1999 .

[32]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  Processing Spoken Chinese: The Role of Tone Information , 1999 .

[33]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Bruno H. Repp,et al.  Integration of segmental and tonal information in speech perception: A cross‐linguistic study , 1990 .

[35]  S. Zhou,et al.  Spatiotemporal Analysis of ERP During Chinese Idiom Comprehension , 2004, Brain Topography.

[36]  趙 元任,et al.  A grammar of spoken Chinese = 中國話的文法 , 1968 .

[37]  D. Norris Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[38]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  Who Do You Love, Your Mother or Your Horse? An Event-Related Brain Potential Analysis of Tone Processing in Mandarin Chinese , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[39]  C. Petten,et al.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies , 2006, Brain and Language.

[40]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[41]  Michael C. W. Yip,et al.  PHONOLOGICAL PRIMING IN CANTONESE SPOKEN-WORD PROCESSING , 2001 .

[42]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  S. Soto-Faraco,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[45]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[46]  Hsuan-Chih Chen,et al.  Brain Responses to Segmentally and Tonally Induced Semantic Violations in Cantonese , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[48]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[49]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: frontal positivity and N400 ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[50]  H. Neville,et al.  Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials , 1991, Psychobiology.

[51]  A. Cutler,et al.  Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[53]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[54]  Hartmut Fitz,et al.  Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension , 2012, Brain Research.

[55]  S. Farmer,et al.  The effects of physical and semantic incongruities on auditory event-related potentials. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[56]  Laurence White,et al.  Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[57]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[58]  Ping Li,et al.  Structure and meaning in Chinese: An ERP study of idioms , 2010, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[59]  C. Petten,et al.  Morphological agreement at a distance: Dissociation between early and late components of the event-related brain potential , 2011, Brain Research.