COMPARATIVE ENZYMOLOGY OF CHLORAMPHENICOL RESISTANCE *

The concept of drug inactivation as a possible mechanism of bacterial resistance to antibiotics is well established and best illustrated by the P-lactamase group of enzymes that have been isolated from penicillin-resistant species of bacilli, staphylococci, and a host of gram-negative microorganisms.1 Although chloramphenicol has been in clinical use for more than two decades and the emergence of resistant bacteria in a number of genera has been well documented, there has been little information available until quite recently on the biochemical details of the specific mechanisms responsible for the resistance of clinically important species. The first observations that led to our present understanding of chloramphenicol resistance due to antibiotic inactivation were those of Dunsmoor and collaborators,2 and Miyamura3 only six years ago. Although such studies clearly established the fact that residual antibiotic activity was lacking in culture Altrates of resistant bacteria grown in the presence of chloramphenicol, it remained for Okamoto and Suzuki4 to show that specific inactivating enzymes could be obtained from cell-free extracts of Escherichia coli, which harbored a transferable R factor for chloramphenicol resistance. The importance of this observation cannot be underestimated since it marked the convergence of two independent approaches to antibiotic resistance, namely, the biochemical method and the recently discovered genetic concepts of transferable extrachromosomal resistance as exemplified by the Resistance Transfer Factors (RTF)5 and the staphylococcal plasmids.6 The chloramphenicol resistance system appeared to be an ideal model, since resistant staphylococci and enteric bacteria were important clinical pathogens and synthetic routes were available for the preparation of a wide variety of analogues and isomers of chl~ramphenicol.~ The commercial availability of radioactive ( I4C) chloramphenicol also provided a powerful tool for studying the metabolic fate of the antibiotic. Within a relatively short period of time, the R factor type of chloramphenicol resistance was shown to be due to acetylation of the antibiotic in the presence of acetyl-Coenzyme A and a specific R-factor mediated The products of chloramphenicol inactivation were shown to be the 3-acetyl and 1,3-diacetyl esters of the antibiotic, and the overall stoichiometry was as follows:

[1]  M. Lepper,et al.  Transmission of chloramphenicol-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis: epidemiologic and laboratory studies. , 1970, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  K. Weber,et al.  The reliability of molecular weight determinations by dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. , 1969, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  W. V. Shaw,et al.  Kinetics of Induction and Purification of Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase from Chloramphenicol-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , 1969, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  J. Sherris,et al.  Decreased incidence of antibiotic resistance among Staphylococcus aureus. A study in a university hospital over a 9-year period. , 1968, Annals of internal medicine.

[5]  R. Williams,et al.  Antibiotic resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci and micrococci , 1968, Journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  Y. Suzuki,et al.  Temperature-sensitive Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase from Escherichia coli Carrying Mutant R Factors , 1968, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  W. V. Shaw,et al.  Characterization of Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase from Chloramphenicol-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , 1968, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  W. V. Shaw,et al.  Chloramphenicol resistance of Staphylococcus aureus: inducers of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. , 1968, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[9]  Y. Suzuki,et al.  The enzymatic acetylation of chloramphenicol by the multiple drug-resistant Escherichia coli carrying R factor. , 1967, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[10]  Shaw Wv,et al.  The enzymatic acetylation of chloramphenicol by extracts of R factor-resistant Escherichia coli. , 1967 .

[11]  M. Finland,et al.  Independent segregation of chloramphenicol resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. , 1967, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[12]  Y. Hirota,et al.  Gene Recombination and Segregation of Resistance Factor R in Escherichia coli , 1966, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  Yoshiaki Suzuki,et al.  Chloramphenicol-, Dihydrostreptomycin-, and Kanamycin-Inactivating Enzymes from Multiple Drug-Resistant Escherichia coli Carrying Episome ‘R’ , 1965, Nature.

[14]  A. C. Baird‐Parker THE CLASSIFICATION OF STAPHYLOCOCCI AND MICROCOCCI FROM WORLD-WIDE SOURCES. , 1965, Journal of general microbiology.

[15]  M. Richmond WILD-TYPE VARIANTS OF EXOPENICILLINASE FROM STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. , 1965, The Biochemical journal.

[16]  J. Fahey,et al.  QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF SERUM IMMUNOGLOBULINS IN ANTIBODY-AGAR PLATES. , 1965, Journal of immunology.

[17]  S. Miyamura INACTIVATION OF CHLORAMPHENICOL BY CHLORAMPHENICOL-RESISTANT BACTERIA. , 1964, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[18]  Chabbert Ya,et al.  VARIATIONS SOUS L'INFLUENCE DE L'ACRIFLAVINE ET TRANSDUCTION DE LA R'ESISTANCE A LA KANAMYCINE ET AU CHLORAMPH'ENICOL CHEZ LES STAPHYLOCOQUES. , 1964 .

[19]  T. Watanabe Infective heredity of multiple drug resistance in bacteria. , 1963, Bacteriological reviews.

[20]  Sherris Jc,et al.  OBSERVATIONS ON THE INACTIVATION OF CHLORAMPHENICOL BY CHLORAMPHENICOL-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI. , 1963 .

[21]  J. Sherris,et al.  OBSERVATIONS ON THE INACTIVATION OF CHLORAMPHENICOL BY CHLORAMPHENICOL-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI. , 1963, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[22]  M. Cameron,et al.  Resistance of bacteria to the penicillins. , 1962 .