Metrics for Managing Research and Development in the Context of the Product Family

The paper proposes methods to measure the performance of research and development in new product development. We frame these measures in the context of evolving product families in the technology-based firm. Our goal is to more clearly understand the dynamics of platform renewal and derivative product generation and their consequences for long-term success. We explore the utility of the proposed methods with data gathered from a large measurement systems manufacturer. We find that the methods and measures can help management assess the technological and market leverage achieved from the firm's present and past product platforms. This provides a foundation for transforming single-product, single-period planning processes into a multi-product, multi-period form that embraces the product family and the renewal of product architecture. The research also shows the need to integrate data from engineering, manufacturing, and sales organizations to produce information for managing the growth of the firm's product families.

[1]  Robert G. Batson,et al.  Characteristics of R&D management which influence information needs , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[2]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[3]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[4]  Lawrence H. Linden,et al.  Improving the Return on R&D—II , 1985 .

[5]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[6]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  The Allocation, Characteristics, and Outcome of the Firm's Research and Development Portfolio: A Case Study , 1966 .

[7]  L. W. Steele What We've Learned: Selecting R&D Programs and Objectives , 1988 .

[8]  R. V. Wyk Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .

[9]  A. H. Schainflatt How Companies Measure the Productivity of Engineers and Scientists : Research Management , 1987 .

[10]  J. Hauser,et al.  The House of Quality , 1988 .

[11]  M. Meyer,et al.  When speeding concepts to market can be a mistake , 1992 .

[12]  Francois P. Van Remoortere,et al.  Project Tracking System Serves As Research Management Tool , 1993 .

[13]  Michael E. D. Koenig,et al.  Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance , 1983, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[15]  G. Stalk Time-The Next Source of Competitive Advantage , 1988 .

[16]  Lynn W. Ellis,et al.  Viewing R&D Projects Financially , 1984 .

[17]  Rene Cordero,et al.  The measurement of innovation performance in the firm: An overview , 1990 .

[18]  John R. Moore,et al.  Computational Analysis of Scoring Models for R and D Project Selection , 1969 .

[19]  Susan Walsh Sanderson,et al.  Cost models for evaluating virtual design strategies in multicycle product families , 1991 .

[20]  W. Souder Analytical Effectiveness of Mathematical Models for R&D Project Selection , 1973 .

[21]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  Measures for Manufacturing Excellence , 1990 .

[22]  W. H. Bleuel The Practice of Management Science , 1977 .

[23]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Technology and Change; the New Heraclitus , 1967 .

[24]  John A. Pederson,et al.  Measuring the Performance of R&D Professionals , 1989 .

[25]  R. T. Goalwin,et al.  Comments on “performance control in government R&D projects: The measurable effects of performing required management and engineering techniques” , 1973 .

[26]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Product development cycle time and commercial success , 1995 .

[27]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Real-world R&D: jumping the product generation gap , 1999 .