Studies on small (<350 microm) alginate-poly-L-lysine microcapsules. III. Biocompatibility Of smaller versus standard microcapsules.

Microencapsulation of islets of Langerhans has been proposed as a means of preventing their immune destruction following transplantation. Microcapsules of diameters <350 microm made with an electrostatic pulse system present many advantages relative to standard microcapsules (700-1500 microm), including smaller total implant volume, better insulin kinetics, better cell oxygenation, and accessibility to new implantation sites. To evaluate their biocompatibility, 200, 1000, 1120, 1340, or 3000 of these smaller microcapsules (<350 microm) or 20 standard microcapsules (1247+/-120 microm) were implanted into rat epididymal fat pads, retrieved after 2 weeks, and evaluated histologically. The average pericapsular reaction increased with the number of small microcapsules implanted (p<0.05; 3000 vs. 200, 3000 vs. 1000, and 1000 vs. 200 microcapsules). At equal volume and alginate content, standard microcapsules caused a more intense fibrosis reaction than smaller microcapsules (p<0.05). In addition, 20 standard microcapsules elicited a stronger pericapsular reaction than 200 and 1000 smaller microcapsules (p<0.05) although the latter represented a 3.4-fold larger total implant surface exposed. We conclude that microcapsules of diameters <350 microm made with an electrostatic pulse system are more biocompatible than standard microcapsules.

[1]  A. Sun,et al.  Generation of alginate-poly-l-lysine-alginate (APA) biomicrocapsules: the relationship between the membrane strength and the reaction conditions. , 1994, Artificial cells, blood substitutes, and immobilization biotechnology.

[2]  Y. Lepage,et al.  Studies on Small (<300 μm) Microcapsules: II — Parameters Governing the Production of Alginate Beads by High Voltage Electrostatic Pulses , 1994, Cell transplantation.

[3]  A. Sun,et al.  Xenografts of rat islets into diabetic mice. An evaluation of new smaller capsules. , 1992, Transplantation.

[4]  T. Starzl,et al.  HUMAN ISLET ISOLATION AND ALLOTRANSPLANTATION IN 22 CONSECUTIVE CASES 1, 2 , 1992, Transplantation.

[5]  C. Stiller,et al.  HISTOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF RECOVERED ENCAPSULATED ALLOGENEIC ISLETS FROM TRANSPLANTED DIABETIC BB/W RATS , 1992, Transplantation.

[6]  A. Sun,et al.  Microencapsulation of living cells — A long-term delivery system☆ , 1985 .

[7]  The rat epididymal fat pad as an implantation site for the study of microcapsule biocompatibility: validation of the method. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  V. D’Agati,et al.  The role of CD4+ helper T cells in the destruction of microencapsulated islet xenografts in nod mice. , 1990, Transplantation.

[9]  F. Leblond,et al.  PROTECTION OF ISLETS OF LANGERHANS FROM ANTIBODIES BY MICROENCAPSULATION WITH ALGINATE‐POLY‐L‐LYSINE MEMBRANES1 , 1993, Transplantation.

[10]  J. Halter,et al.  Preserved insulin secretion and insulin independence in recipients of islet autografts. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  A. Fournier,et al.  Method for the Quantification of Alginate in Microcapsules , 1993, Cell transplantation.

[12]  P. Vos,et al.  The capsular overgrowth on microencapsulated pancreatic islet grafts in streptozotocin and autoimmune diabetic rats , 1994 .

[13]  F. Lim,et al.  Microencapsulated islets as bioartificial endocrine pancreas. , 1980, Science.

[14]  L. Kunz,et al.  The role of oxygen supply in islet transplantation. , 1992, Transplantation proceedings.