Influencing information systems practice: The action principles approach applied to robotic process and cognitive automation

The article formalizes an action principles approach for investigating and influencing the adoption of emerging information systems phenomena, particularly for new technologies. It draws upon recent research into robotic process and cognitive automation to demonstrate the concepts and methodology for a further mode of research into practice that is distinguishable from action research and design science. The authors present definitions, research assumptions, and evaluation criteria and provide a six-step process for generating a set of action principles, updatable by new empirical evidence. The process is illustrated by research into 22 automation cases that eventually arrived at 39 action principles for effective deployment of the automation technologies under review. The major objective is to provide guidelines to prospective researchers. A secondary objective is to provide major insights into the management of robotic process and cognitive automation. This provides opportunities for further theorization and research by academics, and more considered action by practitioners. The authors also discuss the value and limitations of the action principles approach, and how the knowledge generated can be disseminated. The article offers a way of doing research on the applied side of information systems that is timely, does justice to the phenomena under investigation, and provides insights for multiple parties.

[1]  Eli Ginzberg,et al.  A World without Work , 2020, Cyber Republic.

[2]  S. Rivard Theory building is neither an art nor a science. It is a craft , 2020 .

[3]  Xiao Xiao,et al.  The Sociotechnical Axis of Cohesion for the IS Discipline: Its Historical Legacy and its Continued Relevance , 2019, MIS Q..

[4]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Against Theory: With Apologies to Feyerabend , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Sal Aurigemma,et al.  Generally Speaking, Context Matters: Making the Case for a Change from Universal to Particular ISP Research , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Cognitive Automation as Part of Deakin University's Digital Strategy , 2018, MIS Q. Executive.

[7]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Robotic process and cognitive automation: the next phase , 2018 .

[8]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Information systems action research: Debunking myths and overcoming barriers , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Mary Lacity,et al.  Addressing Key Challenges to Making Enterprise Blockchain Applications a Reality , 2018, MIS Q. Executive.

[10]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Making Rigorous Research Relevant: Innovating Statistical Action Research , 2018, MIS Q..

[11]  David E. Avison,et al.  Positivist Information Systems Action Research: Methodological Issues , 2017, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Designing Engaged Scholarship: From Real-World Problems to Research Publications , 2017 .

[13]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Robotic process automation and risk mitigation: the definitive guide , 2017 .

[14]  Mary Lacity,et al.  Conflict resolution in business services outsourcing relationships , 2017, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Netta Iivari,et al.  Towards Critical Design Science Research , 2017, ICIS.

[16]  F. Kamoun Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 2017 .

[17]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  A new approach to automating services , 2016 .

[18]  Julien Malaurent,et al.  Reconciling global and local needs: a canonical action research project to deal with workarounds , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[19]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Service automation robots and the future of work , 2016 .

[20]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Robotic Process Automation at Telefónica O2 , 2016, MIS Q. Executive.

[21]  Paulo Augusto Cauchick Miguel,et al.  A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research , 2015 .

[22]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Businesses will increasingly use robots to deal with theexplosion of data , 2015 .

[23]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Nine Keys to World-Class Business Process Outsourcing , 2015 .

[24]  Joseph W. Rottman,et al.  Prison sourcing: ‘doing good’ or ‘good for business’? , 2015 .

[25]  Martin Ford,et al.  Rise of the robots : technology and the threat of a jobless future , 2015 .

[26]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Nine Practices for Best-in-Class BPO Performance , 2014, MIS Q. Executive.

[27]  James R Cook Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2014 .

[28]  Paulo B. Góes,et al.  Editor's comments: design science research in top information systems journals , 2014 .

[29]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Impact Sourcing: Employing Prison Inmates to Perform Digitally-enabled Business Services , 2014, CAIS.

[30]  H. Willmott,et al.  Qualitative research in business and management , 2014 .

[31]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research , 2015, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[32]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Legal Process Outsourcing, In-house Counsels, Law Firms and Providers: Researching Effective Practices , 2013 .

[33]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  How a professionally qualified doctoral student bridged the practice-research gap: a confessional account of Collaborative Practice Research , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Transforming a human resource function through shared services and joint-venture outsourcing: the BAE Systems–Xchanging enterprise partnership 2001–2012 , 2013 .

[35]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[36]  Stefan Henningsson,et al.  "Ready to Acquire": The IT Resources Required for a Growth-by-Acquisition Business Strategy , 2013, MIS Q. Executive.

[37]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Style Composition in Action Research Publication , 2012, MIS Q..

[38]  Blake Ives,et al.  The Walsham Hotel: the Mechatronic KoolNitro 346 mini-bar , 2012 .

[39]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Witty invention or dubious fad? Using argument mapping to examine the contours of management fashion , 2012, Inf. Organ..

[40]  Ann Light,et al.  Participant-Making: bridging the gulf between community knowledge and academic research , 2011, J. Community Informatics.

[41]  Mark Bilandzic,et al.  Towards Participatory Action Design Research: Adapting Action Research and Design Science Research Methods for Urban Informatics , 2011, J. Community Informatics.

[42]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Beyond Transaction Cost Economics: Towards an endogenous theory of Information Technology Outsourcing , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Abhijit Chaudhury,et al.  Impact of Knowledge Acquisition on Technology Assimilation , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Lee-Ann Fenge,et al.  Striving towards Inclusive Research: An Example of Participatory Action Research with Older Lesbians and Gay Men , 2010 .

[45]  Ping Wang,et al.  Chasing the Hottest IT: Effects of Information Technology Fashion on Organizations , 2010, MIS Q..

[46]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[48]  R. Briggs,et al.  Association for Information Systems , 2007 .

[49]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research , 2008 .

[50]  Joseph W. Rottman,et al.  Offshore outsourcing of IT work , 2008 .

[51]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation , 2008, ECIS.

[52]  Charles Teddlie,et al.  Mixed Methods Sampling A Typology With Examples , 2016 .

[53]  J. Elliott Assessing the quality of action research , 2007 .

[54]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[55]  C. Teddlie,et al.  Mixed Methods Sampling , 2007 .

[56]  R. Ryan Nelson,et al.  IT Project Management: Infamous Failures, Classic Mistakes, and Best Practices , 2007, MIS Q. Executive.

[57]  B. McKelvey Van de Ven and Johnson's “Engaged Scholarship”: Nice Try, But… , 2006 .

[58]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Knowledge for Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[59]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[60]  S. Berg Snowball Sampling—I , 2006 .

[61]  W. Elmendorf,et al.  Using Key Informant Interviews to Better Understand Open Space Conservation in a Developing Watershed , 2006, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[62]  Pär Mårtensson,et al.  Dialogical Action Research at Omega Corporation , 2004, MIS Q..

[63]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .

[64]  P. Holkup,et al.  Community‐based Participatory Research: An Approach to Intervention Research With a Native American Community , 2004, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[65]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[66]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Principles of canonical action research , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[67]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[68]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Application Service Provision: Risk Assessment and Mitigation , 2002, MIS Q. Executive.

[69]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Gapping the Relevance Bridge: Fashions Meet Fundamentals in Management Research , 2001 .

[70]  Ralph Westfall,et al.  Dare To Be Relevant , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[71]  Maung K. Sein The Relevance of IS Academic Research: Not As Good As It Can Get , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[72]  Nicholas L. Ball Design Science II: The Impact of Design Science on E-Commerce Research and Practice , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[73]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[74]  J. Meyer,et al.  Evaluating action research. , 2000, Age and ageing.

[75]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  A Confessional Account of an Ethnography About Knowledge Work , 2000, MIS Q..

[76]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[77]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[78]  M. Pla [Rigor in qualitative research]. , 1999, Atencion primaria.

[79]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Information Technology Sourcing Practices: Lessons From Experience , 1998, MIS Q..

[80]  P. Checkland,et al.  Action Research: Its Nature and Validity , 1998 .

[81]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[82]  R. Baskerville,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[83]  S. Kvale,et al.  InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing , 1996 .

[84]  M. Weggeman Sensemaking in organisations , 1996 .

[85]  M. Marshall,et al.  The key informant technique. , 1996, Family practice.

[86]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[87]  R. Weiss Learning from strangers : the art and method of qualitative interview studies , 1995 .

[88]  Anton J. Kuzel,et al.  Sampling in qualitative inquiry. , 1992 .

[89]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[90]  Viviane M. J. Robinson,et al.  The Origins and Status of Action Research , 1984 .

[91]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Learning the Craft of Organizational Research , 1983 .

[92]  J. Rockart,et al.  A primer on critical success factors , 1981 .

[93]  J. Rockart Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[94]  J. Spradley The Ethnographic Interview , 1979 .

[95]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[96]  John Seidler,et al.  On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis , 1974 .

[97]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[98]  C. Brodsky The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[99]  John Dewey,et al.  The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action , 1960 .

[100]  M. Tremblay The Key Informant Technique: A Nonethnographic Application , 1957 .

[101]  K. Lewin Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[102]  Michael Isfort,et al.  Knowledge and Action , 2003, Nature.

[103]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .