Small stream predators rely heavily on terrestrial matter energy input in the fall, regardless of riparian buffer size

[1]  D. Lafage,et al.  Forested riparian buffer environmental variables are more important than size for species functional diversity in production forests , 2022, Forest Ecology and Management.

[2]  B. Gall,et al.  Orientation behavior of riparian long‐jawed orb weavers (Tetragnatha elongata) after displacement over water , 2021, Ecology and evolution.

[3]  C. Robinson,et al.  Riparian hunting spiders do not rely on aquatic subsidies from intermittent alpine streams , 2021, Aquatic Sciences.

[4]  P. Goethals,et al.  Riparian Vegetation Structure Influences Terrestrial Invertebrate Communities in an Agricultural Landscape , 2021, Water.

[5]  K. Dunlop,et al.  Evidence of energy and nutrient transfer from invasive pink salmon ( Oncorhynchus gorbuscha ) spawners to juvenile Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) and brown trout ( Salmo trutta ) in northern Norway , 2020 .

[6]  M. Volk,et al.  Small Patches of Riparian Woody Vegetation Enhance Biodiversity of Invertebrates , 2020, Water.

[7]  Richard K. Johnson,et al.  The Structure of Riparian Vegetation in Agricultural Landscapes Influences Spider Communities and Aquatic-Terrestrial Linkages , 2020 .

[8]  J. Sánchez‐Hernández.  Drivers of piscivory in a globally distributed aquatic predator (brown trout): a meta-analysis , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[9]  R. Helliwell,et al.  Managing riparian buffer strips to optimise ecosystem services: A review , 2020 .

[10]  E. N. Rodrigues,et al.  Spider assemblage structure and functional diversity patterns in clear-cut, logged, and undisturbed areas in a large Atlantic Forest remnant , 2020 .

[11]  H. Laudon,et al.  Towards ecologically functional riparian zones: A meta-analysis to develop guidelines for protecting ecosystem functions and biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  J. Sadler,et al.  Local and landscape drivers of aquatic‐to‐terrestrial subsidies in riparian ecosystems: a worldwide meta‐analysis , 2019, Ecosphere.

[13]  F. Cobo,et al.  Modelling the factors influencing ontogenetic dietary shifts in stream-dwelling brown trout (Salmo trutta) , 2018 .

[14]  M. Daniels,et al.  Impacts of stream riparian buffer land use on water temperature and food availability for fish , 2018 .

[15]  E. Martí,et al.  Resource subsidies between stream and terrestrial ecosystems under global change , 2016, Global change biology.

[16]  F. Cobo,et al.  Ontogenetic shifts in terrestrial reliance of stream-dwelling brown trout , 2016 .

[17]  M. Milardi,et al.  Reliance of brown trout on terrestrial prey varies with season but not fish density , 2016 .

[18]  Richard K. Johnson,et al.  Strong land‐use effects on the dispersal patterns of adult stream insects: implications for transfers of aquatic subsidies to terrestrial consumers , 2016 .

[19]  S. Sulliván,et al.  Distribution and trophic dynamics of riparian tetragnathid spiders in a large river system , 2016 .

[20]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC , 2015, Statistics and Computing.

[21]  R. Schäfer,et al.  Aquatic prey subsidies to riparian spiders in a stream with different land use types , 2015 .

[22]  M. Greenwood.  More than a barrier: The complex effects of ecotone vegetation type on terrestrial consumer consumption of an aquatic prey resource , 2014 .

[23]  L. Greenberg,et al.  Woody debris and terrestrial invertebrates – effects on prey resources for brown trout (Salmo trutta) in a boreal stream , 2014, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[24]  B. Peckarsky,et al.  Shifts in isotopic signatures of animals with complex life-cycles can complicate conclusions on cross-boundary trophic links , 2013, Aquatic Sciences.

[25]  W. Palen,et al.  Dependence of stream predators on terrestrial prey fluxes: food web responses to subsidized predation , 2013 .

[26]  P. Amundsen,et al.  Dietary ontogeny and niche shift to piscivory in lacustrine brown trout Salmo trutta revealed by stomach content and stable isotope analyses. , 2012, Journal of fish biology.

[27]  L. Greenberg,et al.  Forest-Stream Linkages: Effects of Terrestrial Invertebrate Input and Light on Diet and Growth of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) in a Boreal Forest Stream , 2012, PloS one.

[28]  L. Tranvik,et al.  Reciprocal subsidies between freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems structure consumer resource dynamics. , 2012, Ecology.

[29]  W. Tonn,et al.  δ13C and δ15N Signatures in Muscle and Fin Tissues: Nonlethal Sampling Methods for Stable Isotope Analysis of Salmonids , 2010 .

[30]  L. Marczak,et al.  Resource subsidies across the land–freshwater interface and responses in recipient communities , 2010 .

[31]  F. Lepori,et al.  Forestry affects food webs in northern Swedish coastal streams , 2009 .

[32]  Fabrice DeClerck,et al.  Functional richness and ecosystem services: bird predation on arthropods in tropical agroecosystems. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[33]  M. Murakami,et al.  Effect of emergent aquatic insects on bat foraging in a riparian forest. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[34]  K. Tockner,et al.  Aquatic Terrestrial Linkages Along a Braided-River: Riparian Arthropods Feeding on Aquatic Insects , 2005, Ecosystems.

[35]  R. Briers,et al.  The lateral extent of the subsidy from an upland stream to riparian lycosid spiders , 2005 .

[36]  K. Fausch,et al.  Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones , 2005 .

[37]  T. Okino,et al.  Food source of riparian spiders analyzed by using stable isotope ratios , 2004, Ecological Research.

[38]  E. Wada,et al.  Prey use by web-building spiders: stable isotope analyses of trophic flow at a forest-stream ecotone , 2004, Ecological Research.

[39]  S. Broadmeadow,et al.  The effects of riparian forest management on the freshwater environment: a literature review of best management practice , 2004 .

[40]  A. Rosemond,et al.  Small reductions in forest cover weaken terrestrial‐aquatic linkages in headwater streams , 2004 .

[41]  C. Kendall,et al.  Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur , 2003 .

[42]  K. Collier,et al.  A stable isotope study of linkages between stream and terrestrial food webs through spider predation , 2002 .

[43]  M. Power,et al.  RIVER–WATERSHED EXCHANGE: EFFECTS OF RIVERINE SUBSIDIES ON RIPARIAN LIZARDS AND THEIR TERRESTRIAL PREY , 2002 .

[44]  D. Post.  USING STABLE ISOTOPES TO ESTIMATE TROPHIC POSITION: MODELS, METHODS, AND ASSUMPTIONS , 2002 .

[45]  H. Blankenship,et al.  Cost Comparison of Marks, Tags, and Mark-with-Tag Combinations Used in Salmonid Research , 2001 .

[46]  M. Murakami,et al.  Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  R. Hall,et al.  Organic matter flow in stream food Webs with reduced detrital resource base , 2000 .

[48]  J. Meyer,et al.  EFFECTS OF RESOURCE LIMITATION ON A DETRITAL‐BASED ECOSYSTEM , 1999 .

[49]  Shigeru Nakano,et al.  TERRESTRIAL–AQUATIC LINKAGES: RIPARIAN ARTHROPOD INPUTS ALTER TROPHIC CASCADES IN A STREAM FOOD WEB , 1999 .

[50]  J. Meyer,et al.  Multiple Trophic Levels of a Forest Stream Linked to Terrestrial Litter Inputs , 1997 .

[51]  M. Wipfli.  Terrestrial invertebrates as salmonid prey and nitrogen sources in streams: contrasting old-growth and young-growth riparian forests in southeastern Alaska, U.S.A. , 1997 .

[52]  M. Jonsson,et al.  Land-use effects on terrestrial consumers through changed size structure of aquatic insects , 2015 .

[53]  Klement Tockner,et al.  How wide is a stream? Spatial extent of the potential "stream signature" in terrestrial food webs using meta-analysis. , 2014, Ecology.

[54]  L. Marczak,et al.  Are forested buffers an effective conservation strategy for riparian fauna? An assessment using meta-analysis. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.