Concise Matrix Analysis of Point-Based Prostate Targeting for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) has recently emerged as an effective clinical treatment tool to treat various types of cancers by limiting the external beam dose to the surrounding normal tissue. However, the process of limiting external radiation dose to the tissue surrounding the tumor volume is not a trivial task. Several parameters including tumor volume and inhomogeneity, position and shape of the tumor volume, and the geometrical distribution of the radiation beams directly affect the determination of the external radiation dose. In addition, a major variable in effective delivery of the radiation dose is “set-up error” caused by the changes in patient position. Any changes in the position of the patient affect the geometrical location of the tumor volume and, therefore, need to be accommodated in the delivery of radiation beams during the treatment. This work presents a complete matrix representation required to calculate the three-dimensional rigid body homogeneous transformation matrices corresponding to external beam radiotherapy setup error and subsequent corrections in treatment beam parameters. A new concise orthogonal rotation solution is presented for use with clinical noisy data. Monte Carlo simulations prove the new matrix results are consistently better than the standard inverse solution. The required corrections in beam table, gantry, and collimator angles as function of the planned beam gantry angle are derived. For transformations that include a rotation on the sagittal plane, the required offsets to beam parameters are complex functions of the planned gantry angle but are clearly documented graphically for clinical use. A case study is presented with an error analysis that supports the use of the presented method in a clinical environment. Clinical implementation and evaluation of the presented method with patient data is also included in the paper.

[1]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Measurement of patient positioning errors in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  P. Jeffree The treatment room , 1994 .

[3]  G J Kutcher,et al.  The effects of out-of-plane rotations on two dimensional portal image registration in conformal radiotherapy of the prostate. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Frank Van den Heuvel,et al.  Independent verification of ultrasound based image-guided radiation treatment, using electronic portal imaging and implanted gold markers. , 2003, Medical physics.

[6]  R L Siddon,et al.  Solution to treatment planning problems using coordinate transformations. , 1981, Medical physics.

[7]  G T Chen,et al.  Correlation of projection radiographs in radiation therapy using open curve segments and points. , 1992, Medical physics.

[8]  B. Daniel,et al.  In vivo prostate magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging using two‐dimensional J‐resolved PRESS at 3 T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Martin J Murphy,et al.  Fiducial-based targeting accuracy for external-beam radiotherapy. , 2002, Medical physics.

[10]  David W Townsend,et al.  PET/CT today and tomorrow. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  Modeling and Control of Robot Manipulators , 1995 .

[12]  Jean-François Aubry,et al.  Measurements of intrafraction motion and interfraction and intrafraction rotation of prostate by three-dimensional analysis of daily portal imaging with radiopaque markers. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  K L Lam,et al.  Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  James A. Purdy,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  E J Holupka,et al.  A geometric algorithm for medical image correlations. , 1992, Medical physics.

[16]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. , 2003, Medical physics.

[17]  John C. Roeske,et al.  Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Perspective , 2005 .

[18]  Shinichi Shimizu,et al.  Three-dimensional conformal setup (3D-CSU) of patients using the coordinate system provided by three internal fiducial markers and two orthogonal diagnostic X-ray systems in the treatment room. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Hiroki Shirato,et al.  Calculation of rotational setup error using the real-time tracking radiation therapy (RTRT) system and its application to the treatment of spinal schwannoma. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices , 1988 .

[21]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data. , 1996, Medical physics.

[22]  J Bijhold,et al.  Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancer. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  M. Murphy An automatic six-degree-of-freedom image registration algorithm for image-guided frameless stereotaxic radiosurgery. , 1997, Medical physics.

[24]  L. Boersma,et al.  Impact of tumor regression on functional recovery after high-dose radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer , 2001 .