Revealed preference in online reviews: Purchase verification in the tablet market

Abstract The review systems of online platforms create a stream of online word-of-mouth that allows consumers to learn from others' purchasing experience. However, it is difficult for consumers to discern the authenticity of a review or the reviewer's level of experience with the product. Platforms can aid the authentication process by incorporating a verified purchase (VP) indication, or “badge” as is done on Amazon, in reviews where the consumer writing the review has verifiably purchased the focal product. A VP is a revealed preference for a product implying a utility-maximizing choice where the consumer writing the review has experience with the product. Combining an Amazon dataset on tablet computers with the theory of revealed preference in online reviews, we uncover a surprising new result: the proportion of VP reviews (a revealed preference) is associated with higher future sales, and the effect of the proportion of VP reviews on sales dominates the effect of the mean rating. This novel use of VP with revealed preference theory has implications for new research in the design of recommendation systems, detecting fraudulent reviews, and online profiling/privacy. Moreover, the use of a VP badge is immediately applicable to firms and platforms.

[1]  Jae-Hyeon Ahn,et al.  Do Verified Consumer Reviews Affect Sales? An Empirical Analysis of Mixed Review Systems in the Film Industry , 2018, ECIS.

[2]  Dina Mayzlin,et al.  Promotional Chat on the Internet , 2006 .

[3]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  Explaining and predicting online review helpfulness: The role of content and reviewer-related signals , 2018, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Han Zhang,et al.  Research Note - When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales: A Meta-Analytic Review of Platform, Product, and Metric Factors , 2016 .

[6]  Dina Mayzlin,et al.  Promotional Reviews: An Empirical Investigation of Online Review Manipulation , 2012 .

[7]  Wenqi Zhou,et al.  Do Professional Reviews Affect Online User Choices Through User Reviews? An Empirical Study , 2016, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Exploring reviews and review sequences on e-commerce platform: A study of helpful reviews on Amazon.in , 2018, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[9]  George A. Akerlof.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[10]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  ON THE ESTIMATION OF TRIANGULAR STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS , 1978 .

[12]  Yong Liu.  Word-of-Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue , 2006 .

[13]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Evaluating Pricing Strategy Using Ecommerce Data: Evidence and Estimation Challenges , 2006, math/0609170.

[15]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[16]  Bin Gu,et al.  Research Note - The Impact of External Word-of-Mouth Sources on Retailer Sales of High-Involvement Products , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  P. Samuelson.  Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference , 1948 .

[18]  Lakshman Krishnamurthi,et al.  Investigating the Relationship Between the Content of Online Word of Mouth, Advertising, and Brand Performance , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[19]  Xinxin Li,et al.  Impact of Online Word of Mouth on Channel Disintermediation for Information Goods , 2018, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  David Godes.  Product Policy in Markets with Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2017 .

[21]  P. Samuelson.  A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour , 1938 .

[22]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Self Selection and Information Role of Online Product Reviews , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Mrinal G Ghosh,et al.  Endogeneity in survey research , 2018, International Journal of Research in Marketing.

[24]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  The role of online buzz for leader versus challenger brands: the case of the MP3 player market , 2016, Electronic Commerce Research.

[25]  Michael Luca,et al.  Fake It Till You Make It: Reputation, Competition, and Yelp Review Fraud , 2015 .

[26]  Natasha Zhang Foutz,et al.  Dynamic Effectiveness of Advertising and Word of Mouth in Sequential Distribution of New Products , 2012 .

[27]  Amit M. Joshi,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Elasticity , 2015 .

[28]  Lihua Huang,et al.  Promotional Marketing or Word-of-Mouth? Evidence from Online Restaurant Reviews , 2013 .

[29]  H. Kelman.  PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGE , 1961 .

[30]  Rahul Telang,et al.  DRAFT : Preliminary and Incomplete Comments Welcome Competing with Free : The Impact of Movie Broadcasts on DVD Sales and Internet Piracy , 2006 .

[31]  Xianghua Lu,et al.  The Economic Value of Online Reviews , 2015, Mark. Sci..

[32]  Eric T. Anderson,et al.  Reviews without a Purchase: Low Ratings, Loyal Customers, and Deception , 2014 .

[33]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  On Self-Selection Biases in Online Product Reviews , 2017, MIS Q..

[34]  Wei Chen,et al.  The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: An empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Angelika Dimoka,et al.  The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures , 2007 .

[37]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[38]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Love of Large Numbers: A Popularity Bias in Consumer Choice , 2017, Psychological science.

[39]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Monic Sun,et al.  How Does the Variance of Product Ratings Matter? , 2010, Manag. Sci..