Algorithmically extracted morphology descriptions for predicting device performance

Abstract The device performance of thin film electronics is known to be dependent on morphological properties such as the size, shape, and orientation of aggregates and crystalline domains. So far, descriptions of morphology have been semi-quantitative and loosely linked to device performance. However, by using our recently reported quantitative analysis tool m2py, we create morphology labels and, for the first time, extract quantitative morphology information from scanning probe microscopy measurements. In this work, we use the labels and extracted morphology measurements to validate a novel approach of generating quantitative structure–property relationships through the use of machine learning and regression models; we present this generalizable approach by demonstrating it on organic photovoltaics. In our approach, the open-source toolkit, m2py, is used to label and describe a set of organic photovoltaic devices that have received different thermal annealing treatments, thereby altering their morphologies and, subsequently, their performance. Different regressors and types of morphology descriptions are used to examine the efficacy of quantitative morphology descriptors in predicting device performance. Despite the fact that scanning probe measurements only image the thin film surface, we find that the information-rich nature of morphology data enables accurate device performance predictions, even with datasets that would traditionally be considered too small to generate high-quality predictions. The implications of introducing quantitative morphology information for predictive analysis of other devices and materials is also discussed; given the general and material-agnostic nature of m2py, it is anticipated that the predictive capability of these labels will be ubiquitous to all thin film applications.

[1]  Tao Wang,et al.  Conjugated‐Polymer Blends for Organic Photovoltaics: Rational Control of Vertical Stratification for High Performance , 2017, Advanced materials.

[2]  J. Nelson,et al.  Factors Controlling Open-Circuit Voltage Losses in Organic Solar Cells , 2019, Trends in Chemistry.

[3]  K. Yager,et al.  Quaternary Organic Solar Cells Enhanced by Cocrystalline Squaraines with Power Conversion Efficiencies >10% , 2016 .

[4]  Shinji Nagasawa,et al.  Computer-Aided Screening of Conjugated Polymers for Organic Solar Cell: Classification by Random Forest. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[5]  J. Min,et al.  Machine learning for accelerating the discovery of high-performance donor/acceptor pairs in non-fullerene organic solar cells , 2020, npj Computational Materials.

[6]  Baskar Ganapathysubramanian,et al.  Interpretable deep learning for guided microstructure-property explorations in photovoltaics , 2018, npj Computational Materials.

[7]  M. Zhang,et al.  Photophysics, morphology and device performances correlation on non-fullerene acceptor based binary and ternary solar cells , 2020, Journal of Energy Chemistry.

[8]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Predicting the photocurrent–composition dependence in organic solar cells , 2021 .

[10]  Diego Torrejon,et al.  Generalizable Framework for Algorithmic Interpretation of Thin Film Morphologies in Scanning Probe Images , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  Michael L. Waskom,et al.  Seaborn: Statistical Data Visualization , 2021, J. Open Source Softw..

[12]  E. Reichmanis,et al.  Control of Molecular Ordering, Alignment, and Charge Transport in Solution-Processed Conjugated Polymer Thin Films , 2017, Polymers.

[13]  Haibo Ma,et al.  Unraveling Correlations between Molecular Properties and Device Parameters of Organic Solar Cells Using Machine Learning. , 2019, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[14]  H. Ade,et al.  Enhanced efficiency in nonfullerene organic solar cells by tuning molecular order and domain characteristics , 2020 .

[15]  D. Ginger,et al.  Characterizing Morphology in Bulk Heterojunction Organic Photovoltaic Systems , 2010 .

[16]  Lawrence A. Adutwum,et al.  How To Optimize Materials and Devices via Design of Experiments and Machine Learning: Demonstration Using Organic Photovoltaics. , 2018, ACS nano.

[17]  N. Clarke,et al.  Are hot charge transfer states the primary cause of efficient free-charge generation in polymer:fullerene organic photovoltaic devices? A kinetic Monte Carlo study. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[18]  M. Chabinyc,et al.  Phase separation in bulk heterojunctions of semiconducting polymers and fullerenes for photovoltaics. , 2014, Annual review of physical chemistry (Print).

[19]  Impact of Fullerene Structure on Nanoscale Morphology and Miscibility and Correlation of Performance on Small Molecules: Fullerene Solar Cell , 2016 .

[20]  David G Lidzey,et al.  Novel organic photovoltaic polymer blends: A rapid, 3-dimensional morphology analysis using backscattered electron imaging in the scanning electron microscope , 2017 .

[21]  Wen‐Chang Chen,et al.  Manipulation on the Morphology and Electrical Properties of Aligned Electrospun Nanofibers of Poly(3-hexylthiophene) for Field-Effect Transistor Applications , 2011 .

[22]  Chris Groves,et al.  Developing understanding of organic photovoltaic devices: kinetic Monte Carlo models of geminate and non-geminate recombination, charge transport and charge extraction , 2013 .

[23]  Katherine A Mazzio,et al.  The future of organic photovoltaics. , 2015, Chemical Society reviews.

[24]  B. Stanfill,et al.  Machine learning predictions of electronic couplings for charge transport calculations of P3HT , 2019, AIChE Journal.

[25]  N. Stingelin,et al.  Influence of Molecular Conformations and Microstructure on the Optoelectronic Properties of Conjugated Polymers , 2014, Materials.

[26]  Emmanuelle Gouillart,et al.  scikit-image: image processing in Python , 2014, PeerJ.

[27]  Lionel Hirsch,et al.  P3HT:PCBM, Best Seller in Polymer Photovoltaic Research , 2011, Advanced materials.

[28]  Liang Feng,et al.  Machine learning–assisted molecular design and efficiency prediction for high-performance organic photovoltaic materials , 2019, Science Advances.

[29]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[30]  Yanchun Han,et al.  Phase Diagram of Conjugated Polymer Blend P3HT/PF12TBT and the Morphology-Dependent Photovoltaic Performance , 2015 .

[31]  J. Brédas,et al.  Understanding charge transport in donor/acceptor blends from large-scale device simulations based on experimental film morphologies , 2020, Energy & Environmental Science.

[32]  W. Jo,et al.  Optimization of thickness and morphology of active layer for high performance of bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells , 2010 .

[33]  Natalia Gimelshein,et al.  PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.

[34]  Dennis Nordlund,et al.  P3HT/PCBM bulk heterojunction organic photovoltaics: correlating efficiency and morphology. , 2011, Nano letters.

[35]  Yu‐Ching Huang,et al.  Morphological control and performance improvement of organic photovoltaic layer of roll-to-roll coated polymer solar cells , 2016 .

[36]  J. Brédas,et al.  Organic Photovoltaics: Relating Chemical Structure, Local Morphology, and Electronic Properties , 2020, Trends in Chemistry.

[37]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[38]  Z. Deng,et al.  A Critical Review of Machine Learning of Energy Materials , 2020, Advanced Energy Materials.

[39]  R. Friend,et al.  Crystallization-Induced 10-nm Structure Formation in P3HT/PCBM Blends , 2013 .